NexGold Intersects 3.08 g/t over 17.0 Metres, 4.80 g/t Gold over 5.6 Metres, 84.30 g/t over 1.0 Metres and Expands Drilling Program at the Goldlund Deposit, Ontario

Original announcement by globenewswire on

Company
NexGold Mining Corp.
Ticker
NEXG
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-12 02:06:13 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

NexGold Mining Corp. announced new drill results from its Goldlund Deposit in Ontario, highlighted by intercepts of 3.08 g/t gold over 17.0 metres, 4.80 g/t gold over 5.6 metres, and 84.30 g/t gold over 1.0 metre. These results, from 11 drill holes totaling 4,686 metres, confirm the continuity of mineralization within Zone 4 and are intended to support future Mineral Resource studies. Based on the positive outcomes, the company has expanded its drill program by an additional 10,000 metres, bringing the total to approximately 35,000 metres.

Reasoning: The drill results include several high-grade and wide gold intercepts, confirming continuity within the Goldlund Deposit. The expansion of the drill program and its stated objective to support future resource studies are strong positive indicators for the project's development. While true widths are not precisely stated for each intercept, the overall results are robust and supported by good QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including 84.30 g/t over 1.0m and 70.20 g/t over 0.5m, demonstrate bonanza grades.
  • Significant widths of mineralization, such as 17.0m at 3.08 g/t gold and 16.4m at 1.24 g/t gold, indicate good continuity.
  • The expansion of the drill program by an additional 10,000 metres signals strong company confidence in the project's potential.
  • Drilling aims to support future Mineral Resource studies and classification updates, indicating progress towards resource definition.
  • QA/QC procedures are well-documented, including certified labs and QP sign-off, enhancing data credibility.

Negative factors

  • True widths are not provided for individual intercepts, only a range (50-75% of interval length), which introduces uncertainty.
  • Some intercepts are narrow, despite high grades, which may impact mining economics.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 102

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details a comprehensive QA/QC program including certified laboratories (Activation Laboratories Ltd. and AGAT Laboratories), insertion of blanks, standards, and duplicates, and check assays, with sign-off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“The Company has implemented a quality assurance and quality control (“ QA/QC ”) program to ensure sampling and analysis of all exploration work is conducted in accordance with the CIM Exploration Best Practices Guidelines. The drill core is sawed in half with one-half of the core sample dispatched to Activation Laboratories Ltd. facility located in Dryden, Ontario. The other half of the core is retained for future assay verification and/or metallurgical testing. Other QA/QC procedures include the insertion of blanks and Canadian Reference Standards for every tenth sample in the sample stream. A quarter core duplicate is assayed every 20 th sample. The laboratory has its own QA/QC protocols, running standards and blanks with duplicate samples in each batch stream. Additional checks are routinely run on anomalous values including gravimetric analysis and pulp metallic screen fire assays. Gold analysis is conducted by lead collection, fire assay with atomic absorption, and/or gravimetric finish on a 50-gram sample. Check assays are conducted at a secondary ISO certified laboratory (in this case AGAT Laboratories located in Mississauga, Ontario) following the completion of a program. Qualified Person Paul McNeill, P.Geo., VP Exploration of NexGold, is a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and has reviewed the available data, composites and QA/QC information related to the drill program and approved the scientific and technical disclosure contained in this news release on behalf of NexGold.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'Reported intervals are drilled core lengths and do not indicate true widths. True widths vary from 50 to 75% of the interval length.'

Evidence · text

“Notes: Reported intervals are drilled core lengths and do not indicate true widths. True widths vary from 50 to 75% of the interval length.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill holes were designed to 'infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4'.

Evidence · text

“These drill holes were designed to infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4 of the Goldlund Deposit”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The drill holes were designed to 'infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4'.

Evidence · text

“These drill holes were designed to infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4 of the Goldlund Deposit”

Resource Updateneutral · Story-specific tag

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The additional drilling is intended to 'support future Mineral Resource studies' and 'support future updates to Mineral Resource classifications'.

Evidence · text

“The additional drilling is intended to further evaluate the continuity and distribution of mineralization and may support future Mineral Resource studies.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The document references and quotes 'previously reported drill intersections' from a news release dated February 2, 2026, without presenting new assays for these specific historical results.

Evidence · text

“These drill results are in the same general area of Zone 4 mineralization where previously reported drill intersections were announced (see NexGold news release dated February 2, 2026)”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 84.30 g/t gold over 1.0 metres in GL-26-022 significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

“84.30”

Context: 1.0

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 70.20 g/t gold over 0.5 metres in GL-26-026 significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

“70.20”

Context: 0.5

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 16.30 g/t gold over 0.9 metres in GL-26-025 significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

“16.30”

Context: 0.9

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 12.90 g/t gold over 0.5 metres in GL-26-025 significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t for open pit gold.

Evidence · table

“12.90”

Context: 0.5

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The historical intercept of 71.69 g/t gold over 0.8 metres in GL-25-003 significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t for open pit gold.

Evidence · text

“71.69 g/t gold over 0.8 metres”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The historical intercept of 104 g/t gold over 0.50 metres in GL-25-002 significantly exceeds the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t for open pit gold.

Evidence · text

“104 g/t gold over 0.50 metres”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 102. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (102)

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.1 m
From
15.9 m
To
33 m
Intercept Depth
15.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:15.9-33
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 21
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width, but the grade is moderate for an open pit gold deposit, contributing to overall continuity.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 17.1 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.70 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 17.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
32.5 m
To
33 m
Intercept Depth
15.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:32.5-33
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 21
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a very high-grade sub-interval, but its narrow width limits its overall materiality, though it highlights bonanza potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 9.51 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“9.51”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.5 m
From
262.5 m
To
275 m
Intercept Depth
15.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:262.5-275
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 12.5 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.85 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: 12.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
264.4 m
To
265.2 m
Intercept Depth
15.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:264.4-265.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 7.88 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.8 metres.

Evidence · table

“7.88”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
267.5 m
To
268.5 m
Intercept Depth
15.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:267.5-268.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, further supports the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 9.17 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“9.17”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
274.1 m
To
275 m
Intercept Depth
15.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:274.1-275
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of high-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 4.55 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.9 metres.

Evidence · table

“4.55”

Context: 0.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
70.5 m
To
80.5 m
Intercept Depth
70.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:70.5-80.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 50
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 10.0 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.46 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
78 m
To
79.5 m
Intercept Depth
70.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:78-79.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 50
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate grade over a narrow width, indicating a higher-grade pocket within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade of 1.33 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
300.7 m
To
316 m
Intercept Depth
70.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:300.7-316
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 15.3 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.44 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: 15.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
307 m
To
308 m
Intercept Depth
70.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:307-308
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 7.69 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“7.69”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 84.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
84.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
287 m
To
288 m
Intercept Depth
287 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:287-288
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Interzone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a bonanza-grade intercept, showcasing very high-grade mineralization, although its narrow width means it contributes less to overall contained metal.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza gold grade of 84.30 g/t, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“84.30”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
334 m
To
340.5 m
Intercept Depth
287 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:334-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 6.5 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.14 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 6.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
334 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
287 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:334-335
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.85 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
340 m
To
340.5 m
Intercept Depth
287 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:340-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.37 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“3.37”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
351.5 m
To
359 m
Intercept Depth
287 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:351.5-359
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 7.5 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.04 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 7.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
351.5 m
To
352.5 m
Intercept Depth
287 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:351.5-352.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.68 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“3.68”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.3 m
From
86.7 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:86.7-90
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 50
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong grade over a moderate width, indicating good mineralization in Zone 50.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.28 g/t.

Evidence · table

“3.28”

Context: 3.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
86.7 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:86.7-88
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 50
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 7.12 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.3 metres.

Evidence · table

“7.12”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
145.5 m
To
147 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:145.5-147
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 50
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept, though narrow, further supports the presence of bonanza grades within Zone 50.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 11.00 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“11.00”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.1 m
From
309 m
To
313.1 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:309-313.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong grade over a moderate width, indicating good mineralization in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 2.03 g/t.

Evidence · table

“2.03”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
309 m
To
310 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:309-310
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 7.95 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“7.95”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
324 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:324-335
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 11.0 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.09 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
324 m
To
325 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:324-325
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.90 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“3.90”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
332.3 m
To
333 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:332.3-333
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.12 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.7 metres.

Evidence · table

“3.12”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
349 m
To
357 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:349-357
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 8.0 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.51 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
365 m
To
370 m
Intercept Depth
86.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:365-370
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length of 5.0 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.81 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
217.5 m
To
219 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
217.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:217.5-219
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 50
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of bonanza grades within Zone 50.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 5.91 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“5.91”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.4 m
From
428.1 m
To
444.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
217.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:428.1-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing significantly to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 16.4 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.24 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 16.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
438.2 m
To
438.8 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
217.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:438.2-438.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.58 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.6 metres.

Evidence · table

“3.58”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
443.5 m
To
444.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
217.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:443.5-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 5.51 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
471.5 m
To
472.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
217.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:471.5-472.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept, though narrow, further supports the presence of bonanza grades within Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 7.97 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“7.97”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
375.5 m
To
382.8 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
375.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:375.5-382.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 7.3 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.46 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
378.3 m
To
379 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
375.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:378.3-379
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.54 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.7 metres.

Evidence · table

“3.54”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
From
388.5 m
To
394.1 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
375.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:388.5-394.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is significant due to its exceptional grade over a good width, indicating a high-quality mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 4.80 g/t, approaching bonanza levels for open pit.
  • Good intercept length of 5.6 metres.

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: 5.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
389.5 m
To
390.4 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
375.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:389.5-390.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, demonstrates the presence of extremely high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza gold grade of 16.30 g/t, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.9 metres.

Evidence · table

“16.30”

Context: 0.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
391.3 m
To
392.3 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
375.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:391.3-392.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, further supports the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 6.09 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“6.09”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
12.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
420.7 m
To
421.2 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
375.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:420.7-421.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept, though very narrow, demonstrates the presence of extremely high-grade mineralization within Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza gold grade of 12.90 g/t, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“12.90”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-026Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-026
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
426.5 m
To
443.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
426.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-026:426.5-443.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
126 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a highly material intercept, combining strong grade with excellent width, suggesting significant mineralization in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.08 g/t over a significant intercept length of 17.0 metres, indicating good continuity and potential for bulk tonnage.

Evidence · table

“3.08”

Context: 17.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-026Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 70.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-026
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
70.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
426.5 m
To
427 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
426.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-026:426.5-427
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
126 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, demonstrates the presence of extremely high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza gold grade of 70.20 g/t, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“70.20”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-026Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 12.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-026
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
12.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
443 m
To
443.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
426.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-026:443-443.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
126 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, further demonstrates the presence of extremely high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza gold grade of 12.60 g/t, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“12.60”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
407.5 m
To
417.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
407.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:407.5-417.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 10.0 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.76 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
407.5 m
To
408.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
407.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:407.5-408.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.90 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“3.90”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
441 m
To
447.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
407.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:441-447.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 6.5 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.88 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 6.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
441 m
To
441.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
407.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:441-441.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.27 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.5 metres.

Evidence · table

“3.27”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
442.3 m
To
443 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
407.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:442.3-443
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
409 m
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.21 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.7 metres.

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 11.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
11.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
32 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
375 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:32-33
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Interzone
Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
412 m
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of extremely high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional bonanza gold grade of 11.80 g/t, indicating a very high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“11.80”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.5 m
From
56 m
To
66.5 m
Hole Depth
375 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:56-66.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 21
Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
412 m
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 10.5 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.82 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
62.5 m
To
63.5 m
Hole Depth
375 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:62.5-63.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 21
Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
412 m
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 2.19 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
284.9 m
To
295.3 m
Hole Depth
375 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:284.9-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
412 m
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 10.4 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.79 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 10.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
294.2 m
To
295.3 m
Hole Depth
375 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:294.2-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
412 m
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 2.94 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.1 metres.

Evidence · table

“2.94”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-029Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-029
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
217 m
To
222 m
Hole Depth
327 m
Intercept Depth
217 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-029:217-222
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547416
Northing
5527918
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
415 m
Azimuth
118 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width but a weak grade, indicating broader, lower-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length of 5.0 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 0.97 g/t gold is weak for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
287.3 m
To
291.5 m
Hole Depth
402 m
Intercept Depth
287.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:287.3-291.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
418 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a moderate width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length of 4.2 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.54 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“1.54”

Context: 4.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
289.6 m
To
290.5 m
Hole Depth
402 m
Intercept Depth
287.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:289.6-290.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
418 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 4.80 g/t, approaching bonanza levels for open pit.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.9 metres.

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: 0.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
328 m
To
329.6 m
Hole Depth
402 m
Intercept Depth
287.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:328-329.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
418 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade intercept, though narrow, indicates a high-grade pocket within Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 4.62 g/t, approaching bonanza levels for open pit.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.6 metres.

Evidence · table

“4.62”

Context: 1.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
328 m
To
329 m
Hole Depth
402 m
Intercept Depth
287.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:328-329
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
418 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, demonstrates the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 6.55 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.

Evidence · table

“6.55”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
357 m
Hole Depth
402 m
Intercept Depth
287.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:354.3-357
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
418 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong grade over a moderate width, indicating good mineralization in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.41 g/t.

Evidence · table

“3.41”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
355 m
Hole Depth
402 m
Intercept Depth
287.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:354.3-355
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
418 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 5.48 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.7 metres.

Evidence · table

“5.48”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
356.2 m
To
357 m
Hole Depth
402 m
Intercept Depth
287.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:356.2-357
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Elevation
418 m
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval, though very narrow, further adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 6.27 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.8 metres.

Evidence · table

“6.27”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-25-003Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-003
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
279 m
To
299 m
Intercept Depth
279 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-003:279-299
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept is highly material due to its strong grade and excellent width, confirming significant mineralization in Zone 4, but its novelty is low as it's a re-release.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.31 g/t over a significant intercept length of 20.0 metres, indicating good continuity and potential for bulk tonnage.

Negative factors

  • This is a re-release of historical data, reducing its novelty.

Evidence · text

“3.31 g/t gold over 20.0 metres (from 279.0 to 299.0 metres)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-25-003Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-003
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
279 m
To
280 m
Intercept Depth
279 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-003:279-280
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical strong-grade sub-interval, though narrow, adds to the evidence of higher-grade pockets within the mineralized zone, but its novelty is low.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade of 3.89 g/t.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.
  • This is a re-release of historical data, reducing its novelty.

Evidence · text

“3.89 g/t gold over 1.0 metres”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-25-002Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-002
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
345.5 m
To
354.5 m
Intercept Depth
345.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-002:345.5-354.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept is highly material due to its exceptional grade and good width, confirming significant mineralization in Zone 4, but its novelty is low as it's a re-release.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 7.59 g/t over a good intercept length of 9.0 metres, indicating a high-quality mineralized zone.

Negative factors

  • This is a re-release of historical data, reducing its novelty.

Evidence · text

“7.59 g/t gold over 9.0 metres (from 345.5 to 354.5 metres)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-25-002Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-002
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
345.5 m
To
346.5 m
Intercept Depth
345.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-002:345.5-346.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade sub-interval, though narrow, further supports the presence of bonanza grades within the broader mineralized zone, but its novelty is low.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade of 9.49 g/t, indicating a high-grade zone.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 1.0 metre.
  • This is a re-release of historical data, reducing its novelty.

Evidence · text

“9.49 g/t gold over 1.0 metres”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

GL-25-002Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-002
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.9 m
From
362 m
To
372.9 m
Intercept Depth
345.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-002:362-372.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Zone 4
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept provides a good width with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4, but its novelty is low.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length of 10.9 metres.

Negative factors

  • Grade of 1.87 g/t gold is moderate for an open pit scenario.
  • This is a re-release of historical data, reducing its novelty.

Evidence · text

“1.87 g/t gold over 10.9 metres (from 362.0 to 372.9 metres)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.5 m
From
262.5 m
To
275 m
Intercept Depth
262.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:262.5-275
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.85 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
264.4 m
To
265.2 m
Intercept Depth
264.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:264.4-265.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.88 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.88 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.88”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
267.5 m
To
268.5 m
Intercept Depth
267.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:267.5-268.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.17 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.17 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.17”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
274.1 m
To
275 m
Intercept Depth
274.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:274.1-275
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.55 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.55 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.55”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
300.7 m
To
316 m
Intercept Depth
300.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:300.7-316
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.44 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
307 m
To
308 m
Intercept Depth
307 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:307-308
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.69 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.69 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.69”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
334 m
To
340.5 m
Intercept Depth
334 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:334-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.14 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
334 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
334 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:334-335
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.85 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.85 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
340 m
To
340.5 m
Intercept Depth
340 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:340-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.37 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.37 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.37”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
351.5 m
To
359 m
Intercept Depth
351.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:351.5-359
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
351.5 m
To
352.5 m
Intercept Depth
351.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:351.5-352.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.68 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.68 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.68”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
145.5 m
To
147 m
Intercept Depth
145.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:145.5-147
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.00”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.1 m
From
309 m
To
313.1 m
Intercept Depth
309 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:309-313.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.03 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.03 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.03”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
309 m
To
310 m
Intercept Depth
309 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:309-310
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.95 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.95 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.95”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
324 m
To
335 m
Intercept Depth
324 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:324-335
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
324 m
To
325 m
Intercept Depth
324 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:324-325
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.9 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.9 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.90”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
332.3 m
To
333 m
Intercept Depth
332.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:332.3-333
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.12 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.12 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.12”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
349 m
To
357 m
Intercept Depth
349 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:349-357
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
365 m
To
370 m
Intercept Depth
365 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:365-370
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.81 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.4 m
From
428.1 m
To
444.5 m
Intercept Depth
428.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:428.1-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.24 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
438.2 m
To
438.8 m
Intercept Depth
438.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:438.2-438.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.58 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.58 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.58”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
443.5 m
To
444.5 m
Intercept Depth
443.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:443.5-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.51 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.51 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
471.5 m
To
472.5 m
Intercept Depth
471.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:471.5-472.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.97 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.97 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.97”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
From
388.5 m
To
394.1 m
Intercept Depth
388.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:388.5-394.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.8 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 26.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.8 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
389.5 m
To
390.4 m
Intercept Depth
389.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:389.5-390.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.30”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
391.3 m
To
392.3 m
Intercept Depth
391.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:391.3-392.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.09 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.09 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.09”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
12.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
420.7 m
To
421.2 m
Intercept Depth
420.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:420.7-421.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.90”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
441 m
To
447.5 m
Intercept Depth
441 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:441-447.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
441 m
To
441.5 m
Intercept Depth
441 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:441-441.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.27 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.27 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.27”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
442.3 m
To
443 m
Intercept Depth
442.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:442.3-443
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.21 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.5 m
From
56 m
To
66.5 m
Intercept Depth
56 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:56-66.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
62.5 m
To
63.5 m
Intercept Depth
62.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:62.5-63.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.19 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
284.9 m
To
295.3 m
Intercept Depth
284.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:284.9-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.79 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
294.2 m
To
295.3 m
Intercept Depth
294.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:294.2-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.94 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.94 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.94”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
328 m
To
329.6 m
Intercept Depth
328 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:328-329.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.62 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.62 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.62”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
328 m
To
329 m
Intercept Depth
328 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:328-329
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.55 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.55 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.55”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
357 m
Intercept Depth
354.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:354.3-357
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.41 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.41 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.41”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
355 m
Intercept Depth
354.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:354.3-355
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.48 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.48 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.48”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
356.2 m
To
357 m
Intercept Depth
356.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:356.2-357
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates, check_assays

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.27 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.27 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.27”

Context: and including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Based on the results received to date and the remaining exploration potential within the deposit, we have elected to exp"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.