NextSource Materials Announces Updated Feasibility Study Results for Molo Mine Expansion to 150k tpa of SuperFlake(R) Graphite Concentrate

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
NextSource Materials Inc.
Ticker
NEXT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Madagascar
Primary commodity
Graphite
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-12 14:31:48 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

NextSource Materials announced positive results from an updated Feasibility Study for its Molo Graphite Mine expansion in Madagascar, targeting 150,000 tonnes per annum of SuperFlake® graphite concentrate over a 37-year life of mine. The study reports a pre-tax NPV of US$402.5 million and a pre-tax IRR of 21.0%, with a high overall graphite recovery of 92.0%. However, the company highlighted a new regulatory risk from the Government of Madagascar regarding a potential minimum 10% non-dilutable State participation, which could materially impact the project's economics.

Reasoning: The updated Feasibility Study confirms the strong economic viability and technical robustness of expanding the Molo Graphite Mine to 150 ktpa, supported by high recovery and substantial resources/reserves. However, new regulatory risks in Madagascar regarding State participation introduce material uncertainty and potential adverse effects on the project's economics, tempering the overall positive outlook.

Positive factors

  • Positive economic metrics (NPV, IRR) from the Feasibility Study
  • Significant increase in production capacity to 150 ktpa
  • High overall graphite recovery of 92.0%
  • Substantial Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources and Proven and Probable Reserves
  • Feasibility Study prepared by independent consultants and Qualified Persons
  • Staged expansion approach designed to reduce operating risk and financing costs

Negative factors

  • Significant regulatory risk from the Government of Madagascar regarding potential minimum 10% non-dilutable State participation
  • Potential material adverse effect on project economics due to free-carried State interest
  • Uncertainty regarding timing and implementation of expansion due to regulatory changes
  • Inferred material (2,520 kt) included in the Life of Mine production schedule, which carries lower confidence

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 18

Classification and evidence

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: The document reports 'Measured Mineral Resources of 23.51 Mt at 6.31% Cg.', indicating the highest confidence category for a portion of the resource.

Evidence · text

“Measured Mineral Resources of 23.51 Mt at 6.31% Cg.”

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The document reports 'Indicated Mineral Resources of 76.75 Mt at 6.25% Cg.', indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence for a significant portion of the resource.

Evidence · text

“Indicated Mineral Resources of 76.75 Mt at 6.25% Cg.”

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The document reports 'Proven Reserves Total 21,356 kt' at 6.39% Cg, indicating a high-confidence, economically viable reserve.

Evidence · table

“21,356”

Context: Proven Reserves

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The document reports 'Probable Reserves Total 61,228 kt' at 6.23% Cg, indicating an economically viable reserve with good confidence.

Evidence · table

“61,228”

Context: Probable Reserves

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The release explicitly states that 'Scientific and technical information presented in this press release was reviewed and approved by the following Qualified Persons as defined under NI 43-101'.

Evidence · text

“Scientific and technical information presented in this press release was reviewed and approved by the following Qualified Persons as defined under NI 43-101”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource and reserve estimates are stated to be prepared by 'Qualified Persons as defined under NI 43-101'.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Persons as defined under NI 43-101”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The document clearly states cut-off grades for different material types, such as 'Low-Grade' Resources at 2% Cg and 'High-Grade' Resources at 4% Cg, and a Reserve cut-off grade of 3% Cg.

Evidence · text

“"Low-Grade" Resources are stated at a cut-off grade of 2% Cg. (5) "High-Grade" Resources are stated at a cut-off grade of 4% Cg. (7) Assumes a Reserve cut-off grade of 3% Cg has been applied”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document announces 'Updated Feasibility Study Results' which includes updated Mineral Resource and Reserve Estimates.

Evidence · text

“Updated Feasibility Study Results”

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: The document is an 'updated Technical Feasibility Study', which is equivalent to a Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) and supports project development.

Evidence · text

“updated Technical Feasibility Study”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The document reports 'Inferred Mineral Resources of 40.91 Mt at 5.78% Cg.', which is a speculative category with limited geological confidence.

Evidence · text

“Inferred Mineral Resources of 40.91 Mt at 5.78% Cg.”

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: The Life of Mine production schedule includes 2,520 kt of inferred material, which has lower confidence and can dilute the overall resource quality.

Evidence · text

“Over the life of the mine, 2,520 kt (4.5% of the total ore tonnes in the ROM production schedule) of inferred material above this cut-off has been included in the life of mine production schedule.”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The overall graphitic carbon recovery into the final concentrate is reported as 92.0%, which is an exceptional recovery for graphite flotation.

Evidence · text

“The overall graphitic carbon recovery into the final concentrate is 92.0%”

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: The metallurgical test work included 'a bulk sample/pilot plant program', indicating a high level of test maturity.

Evidence · text

“a bulk sample/pilot plant program”

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: The metallurgical program included 'metallurgical optimization and variability program', suggesting testing across different ore characteristics.

Evidence · text

“metallurgical optimization and variability program”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The document refers to 'processing operation' and 'processing modules' to produce 'concentrate', implying a conventional mill-based processing route like flotation.

Evidence · text

“processing operation”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 18. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (13)

measuredMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 13025000Grade: 4.64Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 604Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:305617c0ee14310bf758
Material type
Low-Grade
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
13025000
Grade
4.64
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
604
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured Low-Grade resource provides high confidence tonnage and grade, contributing positively to the project's economic viability, despite the regulatory uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Good grade for graphite
  • Supports mine plan

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“4.64”

Context: 13,025

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 10480000Grade: 8.4Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 880Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:f70cd64abe634629656d
Material type
High-Grade
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
10480000
Grade
8.4
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
880
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
4
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured High-Grade resource represents a significant, high-quality component of the project, enhancing its economic potential despite the regulatory risks.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Measured category
  • Excellent high-grade graphite
  • Supports mine plan

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“8.40”

Context: 10,480

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 23505000Grade: 6.31Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 1484Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:3ef09cfd61ebf444236e
Material type
Total
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
23505000
Grade
6.31
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
1484
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total Measured resource provides a strong foundation for the project, indicating a high level of geological confidence and economic potential, despite external regulatory challenges.

Positive factors

  • Substantial Measured resource base
  • Good average grade for graphite
  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“6.31”

Context: 23,505

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 39539000Grade: 4.73Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 1871Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:6b958b4e09d4c401f3b9
Material type
Low-Grade
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
39539000
Grade
4.73
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
1871
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Low-Grade resource adds significant tonnage with good confidence, supporting the project's long-term potential, though with inherent risks of the category and jurisdiction.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides good geological confidence
  • Good grade for graphite

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence than Measured resources
  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“4.73”

Context: 39,539

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 37207000Grade: 7.86Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 2925Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:3b0b3452a19bea68752e
Material type
High-Grade
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
37207000
Grade
7.86
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
2925
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
4
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated High-Grade resource significantly contributes to the project's overall value, offering substantial high-quality material with good geological confidence, despite the regulatory environment.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides good geological confidence
  • High-grade graphite material

Negative factors

  • Lower confidence than Measured resources
  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“7.86”

Context: 37,207

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 76746000Grade: 6.25Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 4796Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:07154073b726a2c2fc67
Material type
Total
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
76746000
Grade
6.25
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
4796
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total Indicated resource provides a significant and well-defined portion of the project's mineral inventory, supporting future development plans, despite the regulatory risks.

Positive factors

  • Substantial Indicated resource base
  • Good average grade for graphite
  • Good geological confidence

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“6.25”

Context: 76,746

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 100250000Grade: 6.26Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 6280Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:9e9d7d67a4968622bbda
Material type
Total Measured + Indicated
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
100250000
Grade
6.26
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
6280
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Measured and Indicated resource represents a robust and substantial mineral inventory, providing a strong basis for the project's expansion and long-term operations, despite the regulatory uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • Very large Measured and Indicated resource base
  • Good average grade for graphite
  • High geological confidence for economic studies

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“6.26”

Context: 100,250

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 24233000Grade: 4.46Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 1081Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:50f3ad34f4fac2f8a4da
Material type
Low-Grade
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
24233000
Grade
4.46
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
1081
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Low-Grade resource provides exploration upside but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence, and its inclusion in the LOM production schedule introduces risk.

Positive factors

  • Adds potential for future resource conversion
  • Good grade for graphite

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lowest confidence
  • Cannot be used for economic studies without further drilling
  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“4.46”

Context: 24,233

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 16681000Grade: 7.7Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 1285Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:a8b6bddf970aa89b0710
Material type
High-Grade
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16681000
Grade
7.7
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
1285
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
4
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred High-Grade resource represents significant future potential but requires further de-risking through additional drilling and is subject to regulatory uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • High-grade material offers significant upside potential
  • Adds potential for future resource conversion

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lowest confidence
  • Cannot be used for economic studies without further drilling
  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“7.70”

Context: 16,681

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 40914000Grade: 5.78Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 2366Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:2a3cb6267b910da1470d
Material type
Total
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
40914000
Grade
5.78
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
2366
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total Inferred resource provides substantial future potential but its low confidence category and inclusion in the LOM production schedule represent a notable risk, compounded by regulatory uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • Adds significant potential tonnage for future growth
  • Good average grade for graphite

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lowest confidence and cannot support economic studies
  • Inclusion of inferred material in LOM production schedule adds risk
  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“5.78”

Context: 40,914

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 21356000Grade: 6.39Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 1365Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:76eeb9ae240fc0a29e1e
Material type
Total
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
21356000
Grade
6.39
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
1365
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Proven Reserve represents a highly confident and economically viable portion of the project, providing a strong basis for financing and development, despite the regulatory risks.

Positive factors

  • Highest confidence Proven Reserve category
  • Good grade for graphite
  • Demonstrates economic viability

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“6.39”

Context: 21,356

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 61228000Grade: 6.23Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 3815Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:78ca30c20fd62c5fd245
Material type
Total
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
61228000
Grade
6.23
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
3815
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Probable Reserve adds substantial economically viable material, providing a strong basis for the project's expansion and long-term operations, despite the regulatory risks.

Positive factors

  • High confidence Probable Reserve category
  • Good grade for graphite
  • Demonstrates economic viability

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“6.23”

Context: 61,228

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteTonnes: 82584000Grade: 6.27Grade Unit: % CgContained Metal: 5181Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2025-03-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Keith Wilson, Damian Pianta, Jeremy Tape, Greg Gold, Philip John Hancox, Desmond Subramani, Oliver Peters, Clive Brown, Andreas Savvas, Alkie Marais
Resource group id
resource:4813fe801c2d955d44eb
Material type
Total
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
82584000
Grade
6.27
Grade Unit
% Cg
Contained Metal
5181
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
3
Cutoff Unit
% Cg

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total Reserve estimate confirms a large, economically viable portion of the project, providing a strong foundation for the planned expansion, despite the regulatory risks.

Positive factors

  • Substantial total Reserve base
  • Good average grade for graphite
  • Demonstrates overall economic viability

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“6.27”

Context: 82,584

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No QP/CP Disclosurenegative

No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Metallurgical Results (5)

pilot plantMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteRecovery: 92 %Head Grade: 6.27Head Grade Unit: % CgView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
pilot plant
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
overall graphitic carbon

Recovery

Recovery
92 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
6.27
Head Grade Unit
% Cg
Conc. Grade
97
Conc. Grade Unit
% Cg
Mass Pull
5.9 %

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Canada Metallurgical Services Inc.
Consultant
Stantec Consulting International Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high overall graphite recovery of 92.0% from pilot plant testwork is a strong positive, indicating efficient processing and supporting the project's economic viability, despite external regulatory risks.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional graphite recovery for the processing route
  • Pilot scale testwork provides high confidence
  • High concentrate grade achieved

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“92.0%”

Context: Recovery: Cg (% wt:wt)

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

pilot plantMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
pilot plant
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
+50 mesh product

Recovery

Recovery Basis
unspecified
Conc. Grade
97.1
Conc. Grade Unit
% Cg

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Canada Metallurgical Services Inc.
Consultant
Stantec Consulting International Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high concentrate grade for the +50 mesh product indicates a valuable, high-quality graphite product, enhancing marketability despite regulatory uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • High concentrate grade for large flake graphite
  • Supports premium product sales

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“97.1”

Context: +50 mesh

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

pilot plantMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
pilot plant
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
-50 to +80 mesh product

Recovery

Recovery Basis
unspecified
Conc. Grade
96.9
Conc. Grade Unit
% Cg

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Canada Metallurgical Services Inc.
Consultant
Stantec Consulting International Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high concentrate grade for the -50 to +80 mesh product indicates a valuable, high-quality graphite product, enhancing marketability despite regulatory uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • High concentrate grade for medium flake graphite
  • Supports premium product sales

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“96.9”

Context: -50 to +80 mesh

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

pilot plantMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
pilot plant
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
-80 to +100 mesh product

Recovery

Recovery Basis
unspecified
Conc. Grade
97.4
Conc. Grade Unit
% Cg

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Canada Metallurgical Services Inc.
Consultant
Stantec Consulting International Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high concentrate grade for the -80 to +100 mesh product indicates a valuable, high-quality graphite product, enhancing marketability despite regulatory uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • High concentrate grade for fine flake graphite
  • Supports premium product sales

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“97.4”

Context: -80 to +100 mesh

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

pilot plantMolo Graphite Mine Project · graphiteView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Molo Graphite Mine Project
Commodity
graphite
Region
madagascar
Reported Region
Madagascar
Ticker
NEXT

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
pilot plant
Processing Route
flotation
Sample
-100 mesh product

Recovery

Recovery Basis
unspecified
Conc. Grade
97.8
Conc. Grade Unit
% Cg

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Canada Metallurgical Services Inc.
Consultant
Stantec Consulting International Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high concentrate grade for the -100 mesh product indicates a valuable, high-quality graphite product, enhancing marketability despite regulatory uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • High concentrate grade for fine flake graphite
  • Supports premium product sales

Negative factors

  • Regulatory risk in Madagascar

Evidence · table

“97.8”

Context: -100 mesh

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.