Nine Mile Metals DDH WD-26-07 Intersects (2) High Grade VMS Zones Including 24m of 2.77% Cu-Eq and 9.2m of 4.14% Cu-Eq

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
Nine Mile Metals Ltd.
Ticker
NINE
Exchange
CSE
Region
New Brunswick
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Zinc, Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-12 10:06:36 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Nine Mile Metals announced high-grade assay results from drill hole WD-26-07 at the Wedge Mine in New Brunswick. The hole intersected multiple VMS zones, including 24m of 2.77% Cu-Eq and 9.2m of 4.14% Cu-Eq.

Reasoning: The drill hole WD-26-07 returned multiple high-grade intercepts including significant Cu-Eq and Zn widths in a VMS setting.

Positive factors

  • High grade Cu-Eq intercepts
  • VMS deposit style confirmed
  • Multiple high grade zones

Facts used in scoring: 6

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The announcement reports new high-grade intercepts from hole WD-26-07.

Evidence · text

“announce assay results for DDH WD-26-07”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (6)

WD-26-07Wedge MineIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
WD-26-07
Project
Wedge Mine
Region
canada_nb
Reported Region
canada_nb
Ticker
NINE

Geometry

Intercept
24 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
WD-26-07:0-0

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 24m at 2.77% Cu-Eq is a strong intercept for a VMS deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong Cu-Eq grade and width

Evidence · text

“24m of 2.77% Cu-Eq”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

WD-26-07Wedge MineIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
WD-26-07
Project
Wedge Mine
Region
canada_nb
Reported Region
canada_nb
Ticker
NINE

Geometry

Intercept
9.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
WD-26-07:0-0

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.14
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 9.2m at 4.14% Cu-Eq is an exceptional high-grade intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional Cu-Eq grade

Evidence · text

“9.2m of 4.14% Cu-Eq”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

WD-26-07Wedge MineIntercept: 8.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
WD-26-07
Project
Wedge Mine
Region
canada_nb
Reported Region
canada_nb
Ticker
NINE

Geometry

Intercept
8.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
WD-26-07:0-0

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 4.19% Cu-Eq over 8.3m is a strong intercept.

Positive factors

  • High grade Cu-Eq

Evidence · text

“4.19% Cu-Eq over 8.30 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

WD-26-07Wedge Mine · zincGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
WD-26-07
Project
Wedge Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_nb
Reported Region
canada_nb
Ticker
NINE

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
WD-26-07:0-0

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 15.5m of 1.8% Zn provides good width for a VMS zinc component.

Positive factors

  • Significant zinc width

Evidence · text

“15.50m of 1.80% Zn”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

WD-26-07Wedge Mine · copperGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
WD-26-07
Project
Wedge Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_nb
Reported Region
canada_nb
Ticker
NINE

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
WD-26-07:0-0

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 24m of 1.88% Cu is a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Wide copper intercept

Evidence · text

“24m of 1.88% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

WD-26-07Wedge Mine · silverGrade: 51.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
WD-26-07
Project
Wedge Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_nb
Reported Region
canada_nb
Ticker
NINE

Geometry

Grade
51.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
WD-26-07:0-0

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 5.3m at 51.3 g/t Ag is a notable silver intercept.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade present

Evidence · text

“5.3m of 51.30 g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.