Noble Plains Uranium Drill Program Continues High Success Rate Over Next Sixteen Holes at Duck Creek Project in Wyoming

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Noble Plains Uranium Corp.
Ticker
NOBL
Exchange
TSX
Region
Wyoming
Primary commodity
Uranium
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-14 15:20:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Noble Plains Uranium Corp. announced high success rates from the latest 16 drill holes at its Duck Creek Project in Wyoming, with 81% of holes intersecting uranium mineralization. The results confirm a strong geological trend along a 3-mile corridor, with an average Grade-Thickness (GT) of 0.69, significantly above the industry standard. The company aims to delineate a NI 43-101 compliant resource in the first half of 2026, leveraging the project's amenability to In Situ Recovery (ISR).

Reasoning: Noble Plains Uranium reports a high success rate and consistent uranium mineralization from its latest drill program at Duck Creek. The results confirm a significant geological trend with good grades and thicknesses, exceeding industry standard GT cut-offs for the deposit type. The company's confidence in the project's potential for ISR development is reinforced, with QP sign-off and clear reporting of true widths and cut-offs.

Positive factors

  • High success rate of 81% across 16 holes, indicating consistent mineralization.
  • Intercepts confirm a geological trend with strong potential along a 3-mile corridor.
  • The average Grade-Thickness (GT) of 0.69 is over three times the industry standard cut-off of 0.2 GT for Wyoming roll front deposits.
  • True widths are interpreted to be equal to intercept lengths due to vertical drilling and flat-lying geology.
  • The project is amenable to In Situ Recovery (ISR), a capital-efficient and environmentally responsible extraction method.

Negative factors

  • The reported eU3O8 grades are equivalent uranium from gamma-ray probes, which may not reflect actual concentrations due to potential disequilibrium.
  • No specific QA/QC methods like blanks, standards, or duplicates are explicitly mentioned, beyond calibration of probes and QP sign-off.

Facts used in scoring: 20

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states that 'All of the holes drilled are vertical and the geological units are essentially flat so that intercept widths are interpreted to be true thickness.'

Evidence · text

“* All of the holes drilled are vertical and the geological units are essentially flat so that intercept widths are interpreted to be true thickness.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The news release mentions that Bradley Parkes P.Geo and Paul Cowley P.Geo supervised drilling activities and Bradley Parkes P.Geo is the Qualified Person, and details the use of calibrated gamma-ray probes and geophysical logging.

Evidence · text

“Bradley Parkes P.Geo, VP Exploration and Paul Cowley P.Geo, Chief Operating Officer for Noble Plains Uranium Corp., supervised the drilling activities. ... Bradley Parkes, P.Geo., VP Exploration of Noble Plains Uranium Corp., is the Qualified Person as defined in National Instrument 43-101, who has read and approved the technical content of this news release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The drill results were determined using thickness and grade % cutoffs of 2-ft and 0.02% eU3O8.

Evidence · text

“The drill results were determined using thickness and grade % cutoffs of 2-ft and 0.02% eU3O8.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The drill program includes an objective for 'Expansion of Shallow Mineralisation ~ 130 Holes Designed to extend mineralised boundaries and target higher-grade areas along the 3-mile-long Wasatch roll-front corridor.'

Evidence · text

“Expansion of Shallow Mineralisation ~ 130 Holes Designed to extend mineralised boundaries and target higher-grade areas along the 3-mile-long Wasatch roll-front corridor.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program includes an objective for 'Confirmation of Historic Data - 16 Holes To verify 1,317 historic intercepts in the Wasatch Formation and support a uranium resource'.

Evidence · text

“Confirmation of Historic Data - 16 Holes To verify 1,317 historic intercepts in the Wasatch Formation and support a uranium resource prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 standards.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 20. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (20)

25-28-009Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.6868 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-009
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.6868 m
True Width
8.6868 m
From
36.4236 m
To
45.1104 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
36.4236 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-009:36.4236-45.1104
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448983
Northing
4777844
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept contributes to the overall positive results, confirming mineralization with a good grade and length, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length and grade for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.080”

Context: 28.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 8.6868

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-010Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8392 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-010
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.043
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.8392 m
True Width
8.8392 m
From
35.6664 m
To
44.5008 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
35.6664 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-010:35.6664-44.5008
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448997
Northing
4777870
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept contributes to the overall positive results, confirming mineralization with a good length, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.043”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 8.8392

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-011Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6764 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-011
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.037
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6764 m
True Width
1.6764 m
From
36.4236 m
To
38.1 m
Hole Depth
73.152 m
Intercept Depth
36.4236 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-011:36.4236-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448929
Northing
4777780
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization but is of shorter length compared to others, though it is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Relatively short intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.037”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6764

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-013Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.066Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2192 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-013
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.066
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2192 m
True Width
1.2192 m
From
27.2892 m
To
28.4988 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
27.2892 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-013:27.2892-28.4988
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448916
Northing
4777722
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows good grade but is of shorter length, though it is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good grade for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Relatively short intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.066”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2192

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-014Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.075Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2004 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-014
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.075
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.2004 m
True Width
3.2004 m
From
35.5128 m
To
38.7096 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
35.5128 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-014:35.5128-38.7096
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448923
Northing
4777637
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows good grade and moderate length, contributing positively to the overall results, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and moderate length for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.075”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2004

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-015Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5908 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-015
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.045
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5908 m
True Width
2.5908 m
From
23.4792 m
To
26.0604 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
23.4792 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-015:23.4792-26.0604
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448927
Northing
4777664
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate grade and length, contributing to the overall positive results, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade and length for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.045”

Context: 8.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.5908

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-016Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.6388 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-016
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.6388 m
True Width
5.6388 m
From
41.3004 m
To
46.9392 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
41.3004 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-016:41.3004-46.9392
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448910
Northing
4777585
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization with a good length, though at a lower grade, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is at the lower end of the reported range.

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: 18.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.6388

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-017Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.7056 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-017
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.036
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.7056 m
True Width
6.7056 m
From
27.1272 m
To
33.8328 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
27.1272 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-017:27.1272-33.8328
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448892
Northing
4777589
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization with good length and moderate grade, contributing positively to the overall results, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length and moderate grade for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.036”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 6.7056

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-018Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.7056 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-018
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.023
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.7056 m
True Width
6.7056 m
From
35.814 m
To
42.5208 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
35.814 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-018:35.814-42.5208
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448896
Northing
4777551
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization with a good length, though at a lower grade, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is at the lower end of the reported range.

Evidence · table

“0.023”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 6.7056

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-019Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.9248 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-019
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.9248 m
True Width
7.9248 m
From
1.9812 m
To
9.906 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
1.9812 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-019:1.9812-9.906
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
449143
Northing
4777962
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at shallow depth with good length, though at a lower grade, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length at shallow depth for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is at the lower end of the reported range.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: 26.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 7.9248

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-021Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3716 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-021
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.091
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3716 m
True Width
1.3716 m
From
1.8288 m
To
3.2004 m
Hole Depth
60.96 m
Intercept Depth
1.8288 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-021:1.8288-3.2004
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
449117
Northing
4778023
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a high grade at very shallow depth, contributing positively to the overall results, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • High grade at very shallow depth for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Relatively short intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.091”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.3716

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-023Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9624 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-023
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.017
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.9624 m
True Width
3.9624 m
From
37.0332 m
To
41.0208 m
Hole Depth
60.96 m
Intercept Depth
37.0332 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-023:37.0332-41.0208
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
449096
Northing
4778056
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the stated cutoff grade, indicating it is not considered economic mineralization, though it is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the stated cutoff grade of 0.02% eU3O8.

Evidence · table

“0.017”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.9624

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-024Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9624 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-024
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.9624 m
True Width
3.9624 m
From
1.8288 m
To
5.7912 m
Hole Depth
60.96 m
Intercept Depth
1.8288 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-024:1.8288-5.7912
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
449106
Northing
4778099
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows good grade and moderate length at shallow depth, contributing positively to the overall results, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and moderate length at shallow depth for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.070”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.9624

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-009Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.179Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8288 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-009
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.179
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.8288 m
True Width
1.8288 m
From
36.8808 m
To
38.7096 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
36.4236 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-009:36.8808-38.7096
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448983
Northing
4777844
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a very high grade, significantly enhancing the overall intercept, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Very high grade for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.179”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.8288

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-010Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.101Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3716 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-010
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.101
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3716 m
True Width
1.3716 m
From
36.576 m
To
37.9476 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
35.6664 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-010:36.576-37.9476
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448997
Northing
4777870
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high grade, significantly enhancing the overall intercept, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • High grade for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.101”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.3716

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-014Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.126Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6764 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-014
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.126
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6764 m
True Width
1.6764 m
From
36.4236 m
To
38.1 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
35.5128 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-014:36.4236-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448923
Northing
4777637
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a very high grade, significantly enhancing the overall intercept, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Very high grade for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.126”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6764

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-017Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.055Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1336 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-017
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.055
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.1336 m
True Width
2.1336 m
From
27.8892 m
To
29.9928 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
27.1272 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-017:27.8892-29.9928
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448892
Northing
4777589
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows good grade and moderate length, enhancing the overall intercept, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and moderate length for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.055”

Context: 7.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.1336

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-018Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.095Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2192 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-018
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.095
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2192 m
True Width
1.2192 m
From
24.68928 m
To
25.908 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
35.814 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-018:24.68928-25.908
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
448896
Northing
4777551
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high grade, enhancing the overall intercept, though of shorter length, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • High grade for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Relatively short intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.095”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2192

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-019Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.031Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2672 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-019
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.031
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2672 m
True Width
4.2672 m
From
1.9812 m
To
9.906 m
Hole Depth
67.056 m
Intercept Depth
1.9812 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-019:1.9812-9.906
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
449143
Northing
4777962
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows good length at shallow depth, enhancing the overall intercept, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length at shallow depth for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.031”

Context: 14.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.2672

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

25-28-024Duck Creek · uraniumGrade: 0.103Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4384 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25-28-024
Project
Duck Creek
Commodity
uranium
Region
wyoming
Reported Region
wyoming
Ticker
NOBL

Geometry

Grade
0.103
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4384 m
True Width
2.4384 m
From
3.048 m
To
5.4864 m
Hole Depth
60.96 m
Intercept Depth
1.8288 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25-28-024:3.048-5.4864
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
449106
Northing
4778099
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.02
Cutoff Unit
% eU3O8

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a very high grade at shallow depth, significantly enhancing the overall intercept, and is considered true width.

Positive factors

  • Very high grade at shallow depth for a uranium roll-front deposit.
  • True width is interpreted to be equal to the intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.103”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4384

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.