North American Niobium Highlights 0.150% Nb₂O₅ with124.53 ppm Dy₂O₃ from Pegmatite Grab Sample and 0.19% TREO from REE-BearingCarbonatite Outcrop at Seigneurie, Québec

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
North American Niobium and Critical Minerals Corp.
Ticker
NIOB
Exchange
CSE
Region
Québec
Primary commodity
Niobium
Secondary commodities
Dysprosium, Rare earth elements
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-12 11:09:33 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

North American Niobium reported high-grade niobium and dysprosium results from grab and channel sampling at the Seigneurie Project in Québec. The results include 1,502 ppm Nb₂O₅ from a pegmatite grab sample.

Reasoning: High-grade niobium and dysprosium reported from surface grab and channel samples, providing early exploration signals but lacking the geological confidence of drill intercepts.

Positive factors

  • high-grade niobium intercept
  • presence of dysprosium

Negative factors

  • sampling method is grab/channel rather than drilling
  • limited scale of results

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The results are from surface grab and channel sampling at the Seigneurie Project.

Evidence · text

“Phase 1 channel sampling and Phase 2 selective grab sampling completed on its 100%-owned Seigneurie Project”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

Fact 1Seigneurie Project · niobiumGrade: 1502Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Seigneurie Project
Commodity
niobium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
NIOB

Geometry

Grade
1502
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Seigneurie
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 1,502 ppm Nb₂O₅ is a significant grade for a grab sample.

Positive factors

  • high-grade niobium

Negative factors

  • surface grab sample only

Evidence · text

“high-grade niobium-dysprosium pegmatite grab sample returning 1,502 ppm Nb₂O₅”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 2Seigneurie Project · dysprosiumGrade: 124.53Grade Unit: ppmNeeds review: ungroundedView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Seigneurie Project
Commodity
dysprosium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
NIOB

Geometry

Grade
124.53
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Seigneurie
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
ungrounded
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Presence of dysprosium adds value to the niobium mineralization.

Positive factors

  • presence of dysprosium

Evidence · text

“0.150% Nb₂O₅ with 124.53 ppm Dy₂O₃”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.