NUBIAN PROVIDES UPDATE ON ESQUILACHE SILVER-ZINC PROJECT, PERU
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Nubian Resources Ltd.
- Ticker
- NBR
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Peru
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Zinc, Gold, Copper, Lead
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 19:28:53 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Nubian Resources provided an update on its 100% owned Esquilache Silver-Zinc Project in southern Peru. The company contracted Atticus Geoscience Consulting to compile and re-model historical data, identifying 26 additional veins with significant mineralization. The project database includes historical drilling from 2009-2015 by previous operators, with significant silver, gold, copper, lead, and zinc intercepts. Nubian plans to design infill drill programs to advance the project towards a feasibility evaluation, but no new field work has been conducted by Nubian to verify the veins.
Reasoning: Nubian Resources provided an update on its Esquilache Silver-Zinc Project, focusing on the re-modelling of historical drill data and future plans for infill drilling and feasibility studies. While the re-evaluation of historical data is positive, the drill results themselves are not new, and no current field work has been undertaken by the company.
Positive factors
- Re-modelling identified additional veins with significant mineralization
- Plans for infill drilling and feasibility studies indicate future project advancement
- Technical information approved by a Qualified Person
Negative factors
- All drill results presented are historical and not new discoveries
- No new field work has been conducted by Nubian to verify veins
- True widths of intercepts are not known, potentially overstating apparent thickness
Facts used in scoring: 102
Classification and evidence
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The drill results presented in the document are explicitly stated as historical, from previous operators (Vena Resources, 2009-2015 and 2014).
Evidence · text
“Table 1. List of historical drill holes with significant mineralization, Mamacocha Zone (Vena Resources, 2009-2015).”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true widths are not known for the reported assay intervals.
Evidence · text
“The Company notes that in Tables 1 and 2, true widths are not known. As such, assay intervals are reported as drill core lengths.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Steven Park, Project Manager for Nubian, is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101 and has approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“The technical information contained in this news release relating to Esquilache has been approved by Steven Park , Project Manager for Nubian, who is a Qualified Person within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The document highlights the project's location on trend with major silver, gold, and copper projects including Las Bambas, Tintaya, San Gabriel in Peru and Eloro's Potosi silver deposit in Bolivia.
Evidence · text
“Esquilache is located in the Cordillera Occidental of southern Peru and Bolivia , on trend with major silver, gold, and copper projects including Las Bambas, Tintaya, San Gabriel in Peru and Eloro's Potosi silver deposit in Bolivia.”
Epithermal Depositneutral · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The document describes the Esquilache vein system as 'polymetallic, low- to intermediate-sulfidation, epithermal to mesothermal veins'.
Evidence · text
“Esquilache covers the mineralized core of a large caldera structure that hosts a system of polymetallic, low- to intermediate-sulfidation, epithermal to mesothermal veins containing silver, lead, zinc, copper and significant gold grades.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 102. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (102)
ESH-09-03Esquilache · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-03
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 23.4 m
- To
- 25.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-03:23.4-25.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept of moderate grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-03Esquilache · goldGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-03
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 23.4 m
- To
- 25.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-03:23.4-25.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept of weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“2.04”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 348.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 348.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 124 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:102-124
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade and good width for an epithermal underground deposit, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“348.4”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 124 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:102-124
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept of weak grade over a good width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“1.93”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 124 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:114-124
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · leadGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 124 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:114-124
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · zincGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 124 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:114-124
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“2.15”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 977Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 977
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:164-167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with an exceptional grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“977.0”
Context: 3.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 4.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:164-167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a moderate grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“4.88”
Context: 3.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:164-167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 3.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · leadGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:164-167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 3.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESQ-24-2011Esquilache · zincGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESQ-24-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 167.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESQ-24-2011:164-167.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“2.31”
Context: 3.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-25-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 204Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-25-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 204
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 13.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-25-2011:0-13.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade and good width for an epithermal underground deposit, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“204.0”
Context: 13.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-26-2011Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-26-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 101 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-26-2011:98.5-101
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-26-2011Esquilache · leadGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-26-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 101 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-26-2011:98.5-101
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-26-2011Esquilache · zincGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-26-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 101 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-26-2011:98.5-101
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-26-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-26-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 130.3 m
- To
- 131.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-26-2011:130.3-131.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-26-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-26-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 130.3 m
- To
- 131.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-26-2011:130.3-131.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“2.31”
Context: 1.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-27-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-27-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.3 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-27-2011:48.8-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“47.0”
Context: 10.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-27-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-27-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.3 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-27-2011:48.8-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 10.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-27-2011Esquilache · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-27-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.3 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-27-2011:48.8-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 10.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-27-2011Esquilache · zincGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-27-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.3 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-27-2011:48.8-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 10.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-28-2011Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-28-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.4 m
- From
- 63.3 m
- To
- 68.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-28-2011:63.3-68.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: 5.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-29-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-29-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.5 m
- From
- 30.7 m
- To
- 56.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-29-2011:30.7-56.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a weak grade over a good width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: 25.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-29-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 4.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-29-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 56.2 m
- To
- 60.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-29-2011:56.2-60.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a moderate grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“4.95”
Context: 4.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-29-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 139Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-29-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 139
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 76.5 m
- To
- 78.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-29-2011:76.5-78.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“139.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-29-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-29-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 76.5 m
- To
- 78.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-29-2011:76.5-78.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-30-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 254.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-30-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 254.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 188.2 m
- To
- 191.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-30-2011:188.2-191.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“254.5”
Context: 2.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-30-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-30-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 188.2 m
- To
- 191.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-30-2011:188.2-191.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 2.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-30-2011Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-30-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 188.2 m
- To
- 191.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-30-2011:188.2-191.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: 2.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-30-2011Esquilache · leadGrade: 7.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-30-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 188.2 m
- To
- 191.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-30-2011:188.2-191.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a strong grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“7.14”
Context: 2.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-30-2011Esquilache · zincGrade: 11.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-30-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 188.2 m
- To
- 191.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 188.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-30-2011:188.2-191.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a strong grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“11.87”
Context: 2.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MADDHS15-01Esquilache · goldGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MADDHS15-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 79.8 m
- To
- 81.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MADDHS15-01:79.8-81.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a strong grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“6.60”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MADDHS15-01Esquilache · copperGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MADDHS15-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.6 m
- From
- 193 m
- To
- 204.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MADDHS15-01:193-204.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a strong grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MADDHS15-02Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MADDHS15-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.2 m
- From
- 32.4 m
- To
- 45.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MADDHS15-02:32.4-45.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a good width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 13.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MADDHS15-02Esquilache · silverGrade: 291.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MADDHS15-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 291.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.1 m
- From
- 41.9 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MADDHS15-02:41.9-50
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Ivet
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade and moderate width for an epithermal underground deposit, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“291.7”
Context: 8.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · silverGrade: 44.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 44.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 27.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:24-27.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“44.2”
Context: 3.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · goldGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 27.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:24-27.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“3.41”
Context: 3.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 59.5 m
- To
- 63.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:59.5-63.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“11.0”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.3 m
- From
- 59.5 m
- To
- 63.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:59.5-63.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.96”
Context: 4.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · silverGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 70.6 m
- To
- 78.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:70.6-78.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: 8.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · goldGrade: 3.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
- From
- 70.6 m
- To
- 78.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:70.6-78.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“3.63”
Context: 8.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 78.8 m
- To
- 86.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:78.8-86.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · leadGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 78.8 m
- To
- 86.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:78.8-86.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-04Esquilache · zincGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 78.8 m
- To
- 86.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-04:78.8-86.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“1.44”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-04-BEsquilache · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-04-B
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 98.4 m
- To
- 98.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-04-B:98.4-98.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-04-BEsquilache · leadGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-04-B
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 98.4 m
- To
- 98.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-04-B:98.4-98.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a weak grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“3.40”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-04-BEsquilache · zincGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-04-B
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 98.4 m
- To
- 98.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-04-B:98.4-98.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Gold Zone
- Dip
- -48 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“1.85”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-01Esquilache · silverGrade: 231.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 231.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 150.2 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-01:150.2-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“231.7”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-01Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 150.2 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-01:150.2-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-01Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 150.2 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-01:150.2-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-01Esquilache · leadGrade: 23.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 150.2 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-01:150.2-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with an exceptional grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Exceptional lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“23.31”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-01Esquilache · zincGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 150.2 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-01:150.2-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: 0.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-06Esquilache · silverGrade: 2970Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-06
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2970
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 47.1 m
- To
- 47.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-06:47.1-47.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with an exceptional grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“2,970.0”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-05Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-05
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 122.8 m
- To
- 123.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-05:122.8-123.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-05Esquilache · leadGrade: 7.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-05
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 122.8 m
- To
- 123.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-05:122.8-123.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a strong grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“7.68”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-05Esquilache · zincGrade: 2.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-05
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 122.8 m
- To
- 123.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 122.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-05:122.8-123.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -57 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“2.99”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-31-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 506Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-31-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 506
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 57.1 m
- To
- 63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-31-2011:57.1-63
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with an exceptional grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“506.0”
Context: 5.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-31-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-31-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.9 m
- From
- 57.1 m
- To
- 63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-31-2011:57.1-63
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mamacocha
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 5.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-20Esquilache · silverGrade: 108.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-20
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 108.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 159.3 m
- To
- 168.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-20:159.3-168.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Julian-Katy
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“108.1”
Context: 8.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-20Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-20
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 167.2 m
- To
- 168.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-20:167.2-168.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Julian-Katy
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-20Esquilache · leadGrade: 3.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-20
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 167.2 m
- To
- 168.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-20:167.2-168.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Julian-Katy
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a weak grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“3.42”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-20Esquilache · zincGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-20
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 167.2 m
- To
- 168.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-20:167.2-168.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Julian-Katy
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-12Esquilache · silverGrade: 120.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-12
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 120.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 117.2 m
- To
- 118.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-12:117.2-118.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -42 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“120.3”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-12Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-12
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 117.2 m
- To
- 118.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-12:117.2-118.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -42 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a moderate grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-12Esquilache · leadGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-12
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 117.2 m
- To
- 118.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-12:117.2-118.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -42 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-12Esquilache · zincGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-12
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 117.2 m
- To
- 118.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-12:117.2-118.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -42 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“1.92”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-14Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-14
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 7.8 m
- To
- 8.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-14:7.8-8.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak copper grade
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-14Esquilache · leadGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-14
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 7.8 m
- To
- 8.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-14:7.8-8.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, with no true width disclosed.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-14Esquilache · zincGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-14
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 7.8 m
- To
- 8.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-14:7.8-8.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a weak grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“3.21”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-14Esquilache · silverGrade: 194Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-14
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 194
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 13.1 m
- To
- 14.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-14:13.1-14.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“194.0”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-11Esquilache · leadGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-11
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 33.7 m
- To
- 42.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-11:33.7-42.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Weak lead grade
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: 8.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-11Esquilache · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-11
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.9 m
- From
- 33.7 m
- To
- 42.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-11:33.7-42.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 8.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-11Esquilache · leadGrade: 7.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-11
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.54
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 88.6 m
- To
- 89.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-11:88.6-89.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a strong grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“7.54”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-11Esquilache · zincGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-11
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 88.6 m
- To
- 89.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-11:88.6-89.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-10-19Esquilache · silverGrade: 107.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-10-19
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 107.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 33.1 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-10-19:33.1-35.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -40 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“107.4”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-16-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 160Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-16-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 160
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 139.6 m
- To
- 140.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-16-2011:139.6-140.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -64 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“160.0”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-16-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 7.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-16-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 139.6 m
- To
- 140.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-16-2011:139.6-140.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -64 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a strong grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“7.73”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-16-2011Esquilache · leadGrade: 21.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-16-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 139.6 m
- To
- 140.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-16-2011:139.6-140.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -64 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with an exceptional grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Exceptional lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“21.07”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-16-2011Esquilache · zincGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-16-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 139.6 m
- To
- 140.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 139.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-16-2011:139.6-140.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -64 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a moderate grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“7.30”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-17A-2011Esquilache · silverGrade: 47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-17A-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 95.4 m
- To
- 102.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-17A-2011:95.4-102.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“47.0”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-17A-2011Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-17A-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 95.4 m
- To
- 102.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-17A-2011:95.4-102.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-17A-2011Esquilache · leadGrade: 4.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-17A-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 95.4 m
- To
- 102.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-17A-2011:95.4-102.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“4.64”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-17A-2011Esquilache · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-17A-2011
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 95.4 m
- To
- 102.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-17A-2011:95.4-102.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Mercedes Bx
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a very weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak zinc grade
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-02Esquilache · silverGrade: 102.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 102.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 42.3 m
- To
- 45.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-02:42.3-45.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sta. Rosa
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“102.7”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-02Esquilache · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 42.3 m
- To
- 45.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-02:42.3-45.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sta. Rosa
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical gold intercept with a very weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
- Very weak gold grade
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-02Esquilache · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 42.3 m
- To
- 45.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-02:42.3-45.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sta. Rosa
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical copper intercept with a weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-02Esquilache · leadGrade: 3.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 42.3 m
- To
- 45.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-02:42.3-45.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sta. Rosa
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical lead intercept with a weak grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“3.78”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ESH-09-02Esquilache · zincGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ESH-09-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 42.3 m
- To
- 45.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ESH-09-02:42.3-45.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sta. Rosa
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical zinc intercept with a strong grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“11.5”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-01Esquilache · silverGrade: 75.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 13.5 m
- To
- 26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-01:13.5-26
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -30 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a weak grade over a good width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“75.6”
Context: 12.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-01Esquilache · silverGrade: 162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-01
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 162
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 19.5 m
- To
- 20.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-01:19.5-20.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -30 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“162.0”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-02Esquilache · silverGrade: 86.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 86.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.4 m
- From
- 15.7 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-02:15.7-28
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a weak grade over a good width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“86.7”
Context: 12.4
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-02Esquilache · silverGrade: 199.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-02
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 199.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 21.4 m
- To
- 24.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-02:21.4-24.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“199.7”
Context: 2.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-03Esquilache · silverGrade: 152.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-03
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 152.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 13.2 m
- To
- 19 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-03:13.2-19
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -30 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“152.9”
Context: 5.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-03Esquilache · silverGrade: 239Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-03
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 239
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 13.2 m
- To
- 13.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-03:13.2-13.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -30 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“239.0”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-04Esquilache · silverGrade: 144.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 144.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 17.6 m
- To
- 26.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-04:17.6-26.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“144.6”
Context: 8.7
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-04Esquilache · silverGrade: 374Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 374
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 1.4 m
- To
- 2.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-04:1.4-2.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“374.0”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-04Esquilache · silverGrade: 314Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-04
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 314
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 20.5 m
- To
- 22 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-04:20.5-22
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a strong grade over a very narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“314.0”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-05Esquilache · silverGrade: 166.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-05
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 166.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.1 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 13.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-05:0-13.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -30 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a good width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“166.6”
Context: 13.1
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-05Esquilache · silverGrade: 593Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-05
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 593
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 8.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-05:6.1-8.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -30 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with an exceptional grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“593.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-06Esquilache · silverGrade: 83.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-06
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 83.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.8 m
- From
- 5.1 m
- To
- 10.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-06:5.1-10.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a weak grade over a moderate width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“83.2”
Context: 5.8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SEVDDHS14-06Esquilache · silverGrade: 104Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SEVDDHS14-06
- Project
- Esquilache
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- peru
- Ticker
- NBR
Geometry
- Grade
- 104
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 7.3 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SEVDDHS14-06:7.3-9.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Sepúlveda
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-12-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical silver intercept with a moderate grade over a narrow width, but true width is not known.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new
- Apparent width only, true width not known
Evidence · table
“104.0”
Context: 1.9
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.