# Omai Gold Announces Preliminary Economic Assessment for Its Omai Project, Guyana

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/OMG/news/5688832521866609/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-08-19T11:03:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Omai Gold Mines Corp.

- Ticker: OMG

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Guyana

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Economic study, Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 14:27:20 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Omai Gold announced positive results from a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for its Omai Project in Guyana. The PEA outlines an 18-year mine life producing 6.327 million ounces of gold with a post-tax NPV5% of $4.0 billion and an IRR of 24% at a $3,600/oz gold price. Initial capital costs are estimated at $1.427 billion, with all-in sustaining costs of $1,608/oz. The study is based on an April 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate that includes a significant inferred component.

Reasoning: The PEA demonstrates robust economics for a large-scale gold project, but its preliminary nature and reliance on inferred resources introduce some uncertainty regarding project execution and financing.

- Positive factor: Strong NPV and IRR for a large-scale gold project

- Positive factor: Long mine life and high annual gold production

- Positive factor: Existing infrastructure benefits from past production

- Positive factor: Non-refractory metallurgy with high recovery

- Negative factor: Preliminary nature of the PEA study

- Negative factor: Significant reliance on inferred mineral resources

- Negative factor: High initial capital expenditure

Facts used in scoring: 8

## Classification and evidence

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill\_cil route \("CIL"\)

**Gravity Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route \("gravity"\)

**Single Domain Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (6)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae#fact-resource-facts-1)

Omai Property · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Omai Property
- Commodity: gold
- Region: guyana
- Reported Region: Guyana
- Ticker: OMG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng.
- Resource group id: resource:a11877621248cb332b0e
- Deposit or zone: Wenot shear-hosted deposit
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 28400000
- Grade: 1.59
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 1.453
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-07

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Wenot deposit contributes a substantial indicated resource to the overall project, providing a solid foundation for the PEA, though it is complemented by a larger inferred component.

- Positive factor: Significant indicated resource for the Wenot deposit

- Positive factor: Forms a key part of the PEA mine plan

Evidence · text

> The Wenot deposit comprises 1.453 Moz averaging 1.59 g/t Au \(28.4 Mt\) in the Indicated category

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae#fact-resource-facts-2)

Omai Property · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Omai Property
- Commodity: gold
- Region: guyana
- Reported Region: Guyana
- Ticker: OMG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng.
- Resource group id: resource:ccbae4d14143b5ac53ca
- Deposit or zone: Wenot shear-hosted deposit
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 92400000
- Grade: 1.35
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 4
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.3
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-07

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Wenot deposit holds a very large inferred resource, indicating substantial exploration upside, but its classification as inferred means it is considered speculative for economic considerations.

- Positive factor: Very large inferred resource for the Wenot deposit

- Positive factor: Provides significant potential for future resource upgrades

- Negative factor: High proportion of inferred resources, which are speculative geologically

Evidence · text

> and a further 4.00 Moz averaging 1.35 g/t Au \(92.4 Mt\) in the Inferred category.

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae#fact-resource-facts-3)

Omai Property · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Omai Property
- Commodity: gold
- Region: guyana
- Reported Region: Guyana
- Ticker: OMG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng.
- Resource group id: resource:4598c5e07442f13ba12e
- Deposit or zone: Gilt intrusion-hosted deposit
- Mining method: underground
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 9700000
- Grade: 3.33
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 1.04
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 1.7
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-07

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Gilt deposit offers a high-grade indicated resource, which is a positive for the project's overall economics and supports the underground mining component.

- Positive factor: High-grade indicated resource for the Gilt deposit

- Positive factor: Provides a strong underground component to the mine plan

Evidence · text

> The Gilt deposit hosts an Indicated MRE of 1.04 Moz of gold averaging 3.33 g/t Au \(9.7 Mt\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae#fact-resource-facts-4)

Omai Property · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Omai Property
- Commodity: gold
- Region: guyana
- Reported Region: Guyana
- Ticker: OMG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng.
- Resource group id: resource:8c2c1b9cf56165955ace
- Deposit or zone: Gilt intrusion-hosted deposit
- Mining method: underground
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 14200000
- Grade: 3.22
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 1.47
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 1.7
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-07

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Gilt deposit's high-grade inferred resource adds substantial potential to the project, but its inferred status means further work is needed to increase confidence for economic studies.

- Positive factor: High-grade inferred resource for the Gilt deposit

- Positive factor: Adds significant potential ounces to the project

- Negative factor: Inferred classification indicates lower geological confidence

Evidence · text

> and Inferred of 1.47 Moz of gold averaging 3.22 g/t Au \(14.2 Mt\).

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae#fact-resource-facts-5)

Omai Property · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Omai Property
- Commodity: gold
- Region: guyana
- Reported Region: Guyana
- Ticker: OMG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng.
- Resource group id: resource:09232eacef4197960c99
- Deposit or zone: Omai Property
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 38100000
- Grade: 2.04
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 2.495
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.27
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-07

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The project's total indicated resource is significant, providing a robust and higher-confidence portion of the overall resource base for the PEA.

- Positive factor: Substantial total indicated resource for the project

- Positive factor: Provides a strong foundation for economic studies

Evidence · text

> comprised of 2.495 Moz Au averaging 2.04 g/t Au \(in 38.1 Mt\) in the Indicated category

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae#fact-resource-facts-6)

Omai Property · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Omai Property
- Commodity: gold
- Region: guyana
- Reported Region: Guyana
- Ticker: OMG

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng.
- Resource group id: resource:66621fd59ce830500d3d
- Deposit or zone: Omai Property
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 106600000
- Grade: 1.59
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 5.465
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.27
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-04-07

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The project's total inferred resource is very large, providing substantial long-term potential, but its classification as inferred means it carries a higher degree of geological uncertainty.

- Positive factor: Very large total inferred resource for the project

- Positive factor: Offers significant potential for future growth and upgrades

- Negative factor: High proportion of inferred resources, indicating lower geological confidence

Evidence · text

> and a further 5.465 Moz Au averaging 1.59 g/t Au \(in 106.6 Mt\) in the Inferred category.

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## Metallurgical Results (1)

### carbon-in-leach

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/omai-gold-announces-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-its-omai-project-guyana--d4b63892-4f57-466c-9300-27813089d0ae#fact-metallurgical-facts-7)

Omai Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Omai Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: guyana
- Reported Region: Guyana
- Ticker: OMG

#### Test Work

- Program Status: detailed
- Test Type: carbon-in-leach
- Processing Route: grinding, gravity separation, and carbon-in-leach \(CIL\)
- Sample: clean, non-refractory gold mineralization, free of deleterious components
- Leach Time: 32 hours

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 93 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 1.35
- Head Grade Unit: g/t Au

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported high gold recovery and favorable metallurgical characteristics \(non-refractory, no deleterious elements\) are very positive for the project's processing economics, though the exact test scale could provide more confidence.

- Positive factor: High gold recovery \(93%\) for a CIL process

- Positive factor: Non-refractory mineralization, free of deleterious components

- Positive factor: Standard and proven CIL flowsheet

- Negative factor: Specific test scale \(e.g., pilot, locked-cycle\) not explicitly detailed

Evidence · text

> Average gold recovery is estimated at 93% based on historical recoveries and results from recent metallurgical test work which indicate clean, non-refractory gold mineralization, free of deleterious components. Optimal recovery is achieved at 32-hour leach retention time.

#### Tags used in scoring

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The 93% gold recovery is at the exceptional band for a CIL processing route.

Evidence · text

> Average gold recovery is estimated at 93%

**Free Milling**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: The mineralization is described as clean, non-refractory, and free of deleterious components.

Evidence · text

> clean, non-refractory gold mineralization, free of deleterious components

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: The processing facility is based on a standard metallurgical flowsheet consisting of grinding, gravity separation, and carbon-in-leach \(CIL\).

Evidence · text

> conventional 25,000 tpd processing facility based on a standard metallurgical flowsheet, consisting of grinding, gravity separation, and carbon-in-leach \("CIL"\)

**Gravity Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing\_route matches the gravity signal

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
