Omai Gold Reports Positive Metallurgical Testwork at its Omai Project with Gold Recoveries from 93% to 95%

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Omai Gold Mines Corp.
Ticker
OMG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Guyana
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-18 14:49:04 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Omai Gold has reported successful Phase 1 metallurgical testwork at its Omai Project in Guyana, demonstrating gold recoveries between 93% and 95%. The results show clean mineralogy and rapid leach kinetics, supporting the upcoming Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).

Reasoning: The metallurgical results show high gold recoveries and clean mineralogy, which significantly de-risks the upcoming PEA for the Omai project.

Positive factors

  • High gold recoveries (up to 95%)
  • Clean mineralogy with no deleterious organic carbon or antimony
  • Rapid leach kinetics
  • SGS accredited laboratory used
  • Supports upcoming PEA

Negative factors

  • Testing limited to bottle roll/batch scale

Facts used in scoring: 7

Classification and evidence

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Gold recoveries reached 95% which is in the exceptional/strong band for gold CIL/mill routes.

Evidence · text

“95% Au extraction at 3.2 g/t Au”

Free Millingpositive

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: Mineralogy is described as clean with no organic carbon or deleterious components.

Evidence · text

“Both Wenot and Gilt deposit mineralogies are clean with no deleterious components (no organic carbon, tellurides, or antimony)”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release mentions correlation between exploration drill core assays and metallurgical head grades as a QA/QC component.

Evidence · text

“As a component of QA/QC for metallurgical test work, each composite sample was assayed and compared with the calculated weighted grade from exploration drill program sampling.”

Bench Scale Onlynegative

Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: The testwork was conducted using standard bottle roll leach tests.

Evidence · text

“The objective of this Phase 1 metallurgical testwork was to determine the amenability of the Wenot and Gilt gold deposits to a standard bottle roll leach and CIL circuit.”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("CIL")

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (4)

indicatedOmai Gold Project · goldTonnes: 28400000Grade: 1.59Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1453000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Omai Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:e076c171a0acbeb6cf14
Deposit or zone
Wenot
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
28400000
Grade
1.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1453000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-14

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Wenot Indicated resource grew by nearly 50% in ounces.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage and grade increase

Evidence · text

“Wenot Indicated MRE increased 49.8% to 1,453,000 ounces ("oz") of gold with an average grade of 1.59 g/t Au, contained in 28.4 million tonnes ("Mt")”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredOmai Gold Project · goldTonnes: 92400000Grade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3999000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Omai Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:beee98892d41d0f90b4c
Deposit or zone
Wenot
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
92400000
Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3999000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-14

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wenot Inferred resource increased by 7.6%.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in inferred ounces

Evidence · text

“Wenot Inferred MRE increased 7.6% to 3,999,000 oz grading 1.35 g/t Au, contained in 92.4 Mt”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredOmai Gold Project · goldTonnes: 14200000Grade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1465000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Omai Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ca3a616513da189180b1
Deposit or zone
Gilt
Mining method
underground
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14200000
Grade
3.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1465000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-14

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gilt Inferred resource increased by 120%.

Positive factors

  • Massive increase in inferred ounces

Evidence · text

“Gilt's Inferred MRE increased 120% to 1,465,000 oz averaging 3.22 g/t Au (in 14.2 Mt)”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedOmai Gold Project · goldTonnes: 9700000Grade: 3.33Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1042000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Omai Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:0905c7b210145dfc897e
Deposit or zone
Gilt
Mining method
underground
Material type
fresh
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9700000
Grade
3.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1042000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-14

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gilt Indicated resource decreased by 9.5%.

Negative factors

  • Indicated resource tonnage/ounces decreased

Evidence · text

“Gilt's ... Indicated MRE decreased by 9.5% to 1,042,000 oz averaging 3.33 g/t Au (in 9.7 Mt)”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Metallurgical Results (3)

bottle rollOmai Gold Project · goldRecovery: 93 %Head Grade: 1Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Omai Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
bottle roll leach and CIL circuit
Sample
Wenot deposit composite samples (61 samples)
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
93 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Lab

Laboratory
SGS (Canada)

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 93% recovery at 1.0 g/t is a strong result for a preliminary bottle roll test.

Positive factors

  • High recovery at low head grade

Evidence · text

“93% gold ("Au") extraction at 1.0 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

bottle rollOmai Gold Project · goldRecovery: 95 %Head Grade: 3.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Omai Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
bottle roll leach and CIL circuit
Sample
Wenot deposit composite samples (61 samples)
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
95 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Lab

Laboratory
SGS (Canada)

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 95% recovery at 3.2 g/t is an excellent result.

Positive factors

  • High recovery at higher head grade

Evidence · text

“95% Au extraction at 3.2 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 95% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollOmai Gold Project · goldRecovery: 95 %Head Grade: 3.2Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Omai Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
bottle roll leach and CIL circuit
Sample
Gilt deposit composite samples (11 samples)
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
95 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3.2
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Lab

Laboratory
SGS (Canada)

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maximum recovery reported was 95%.

Positive factors

  • High recovery

Evidence · text

“95% Au extraction at 3.2 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 95% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.