ONGold Initiates Infill Sampling Program to Recover Missing Tungsten and Gold Assays at Monument Bay for Enhanced Resource Modeling and Development
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- ONGold Resources Ltd.
- Ticker
- ONAU
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Manitoba, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Tungsten
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-18 15:19:12 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
ONGold Resources Ltd. has initiated an infill sampling program at its Monument Bay project to recover missing tungsten and gold assays from historical drill core. This program aims to enhance resource modeling and unlock new value from tungsten, which was previously overlooked. The company highlights several high-grade historical gold and tungsten intercepts, emphasizing the potential for Monument Bay as a multi-commodity asset, while noting that historical resource estimates are not current and require verification.
Reasoning: The document announces an infill sampling program to recover missing tungsten and gold assays from historical drill core at the Monument Bay project. This initiative aims to enhance resource modeling and unlock new value from previously overlooked tungsten mineralization. The reported historical intercepts show very high grades for both gold and tungsten, indicating significant potential. However, the data is historical, and the resource estimates are not current, which tempers the novelty and confidence.
Positive factors
- Identification of significant tungsten mineralization previously overlooked
- High-grade gold and tungsten intercepts from historical drilling
- Initiation of infill sampling program to enhance resource modeling
- Potential to unlock new value and position Monument Bay as a multi-commodity asset
Negative factors
- Drill results are historical, not new drilling
- Historical resource estimates are not current and require verification
- Lack of explicit QA/QC disclosure for the current infill sampling program
Facts used in scoring: 111
Classification and evidence
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document highlights 'Historically significant gold-tungsten intercepts' and discusses 'missing tungsten and gold assays' from 'intervals not previously sampled' in 'historical drill core', indicating these are not new drilling results.
Evidence · text
“Historically significant gold-tungsten intercepts have been returned from all six (6) steeply east plunging, north dipping shoots”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The release does not disclose QA/QC procedures for the infill sampling program or the historical assays being re-evaluated.
Evidence · text
“ONGold Initiates Infill Sampling Program to Recover Missing Tungsten and Gold Assays at Monument Bay for Enhanced Resource Modeling and Development”
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: The comments for several drill intercepts mention arsenopyrite (aspy) and pyrite (py), which are sources of arsenic and sulfur.
Evidence · table
“aspy, py”
Context: Int. Feld Porph Vol Flow; adjacent to feld. Porphyry dyke; locally mod silica-albite altered; up to 20 % qtz veined, bx,aspy, py
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 111. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (111)
TL-05-275Monument Bay · goldGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 137.5 m
- To
- 154.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:137.5-154.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate gold intercept over a good width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2.05”
Context: 17.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 137.5 m
- To
- 154.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:137.5-154.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a good width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 17.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 4076Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 17.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4076
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 17.4 m
- From
- 137.5 m
- To
- 154.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 137.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:137.5-154.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a good width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“4,076”
Context: 17.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · goldGrade: 2.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 140.5 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:140.5-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate gold intercept over a good width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2.69”
Context: 10.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 140.5 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:140.5-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a good width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 10.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 6756Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6756
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 140.5 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:140.5-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a good width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Significant intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“6,756”
Context: 10.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · goldGrade: 3.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 140.5 m
- To
- 146.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:140.5-146.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3.65”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 140.5 m
- To
- 146.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:140.5-146.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 8810Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8810
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 140.5 m
- To
- 146.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 140.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:140.5-146.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“8,810”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · goldGrade: 2.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 141.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:141.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2.98”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 141.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:141.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.85”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 14684Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14684
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 141.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:141.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“14,684”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · goldGrade: 6.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 145.5 m
- To
- 146.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:145.5-146.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“6.77”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 145.5 m
- To
- 146.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:145.5-146.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“4.40”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 34897Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 34897
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 145.5 m
- To
- 146.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:145.5-146.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“34,897”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 149.5 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:149.5-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 149.5 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:149.5-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-275Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 14547Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-275
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14547
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 149.5 m
- To
- 150.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 149.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-275:149.5-150.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“14,547”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · goldGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 277.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:273.4-277.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“12.90”
Context: 4.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 277.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:273.4-277.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: 4.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 4980Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4980
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 277.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:273.4-277.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“4,980”
Context: 4.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · goldGrade: 17.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 276.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:273.4-276.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“17.73”
Context: 3.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 276.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:273.4-276.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: 3.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 6781Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6781
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 276.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:273.4-276.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“6,781”
Context: 3.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · goldGrade: 77.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 77.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 275.5 m
- To
- 276 m
- Intercept Depth
- 275.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:275.5-276
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a bonanza gold intercept, well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic deposits, but over a very narrow width. It is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“77.13”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 275.5 m
- To
- 276 m
- Intercept Depth
- 275.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:275.5-276
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1444Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1444
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 275.5 m
- To
- 276 m
- Intercept Depth
- 275.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:275.5-276
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1,444”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · goldGrade: 6.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 276 m
- To
- 276.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:276-276.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“6.77”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 3.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.84
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 276 m
- To
- 276.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:276-276.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3.84”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-245Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 30482Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-245
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 30482
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 276 m
- To
- 276.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 276 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-245:276-276.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“30,482”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · goldGrade: 14.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 264.6 m
- To
- 267.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 264.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:264.6-267.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“14.02”
Context: 2.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 264.6 m
- To
- 267.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 264.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:264.6-267.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.96”
Context: 2.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 7614Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 7614
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 264.6 m
- To
- 267.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 264.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:264.6-267.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“7,614”
Context: 2.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · goldGrade: 22.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 265.6 m
- To
- 267.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 265.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:265.6-267.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“22.72”
Context: 1.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 265.6 m
- To
- 267.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 265.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:265.6-267.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.56”
Context: 1.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 12342Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 12342
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 265.6 m
- To
- 267.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 265.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:265.6-267.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“12,342”
Context: 1.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · goldGrade: 50.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 265.6 m
- To
- 266.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 265.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:265.6-266.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a bonanza gold intercept, well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic deposits, but over a very narrow width. It is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“50.93”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 265.6 m
- To
- 266.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 265.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:265.6-266.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 8140Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8140
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 265.6 m
- To
- 266.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 265.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:265.6-266.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“8,140”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · goldGrade: 16.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 266.1 m
- To
- 266.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 266.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:266.1-266.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“16.76”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 3.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 266.1 m
- To
- 266.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 266.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:266.1-266.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3.27”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-107Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 25936Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-107
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 25936
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 266.1 m
- To
- 266.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 266.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-107:266.1-266.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“25,936”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · goldGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 185 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:181.4-185
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“4.30”
Context: 3.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 185 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:181.4-185
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 3.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 6771Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6771
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 185 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:181.4-185
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“6,771”
Context: 3.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · goldGrade: 5.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 184.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:181.4-184.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“5.43”
Context: 2.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 184.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:181.4-184.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 2.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 8787Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8787
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 181.4 m
- To
- 184.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 181.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:181.4-184.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“8,787”
Context: 2.75
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · goldGrade: 9.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 182.5 m
- To
- 183 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:182.5-183
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“9.33”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 182.5 m
- To
- 183 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:182.5-183
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 8819Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8819
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 182.5 m
- To
- 183 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:182.5-183
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“8,819”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · goldGrade: 7.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:183-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“7.49”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 3.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:183-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3.87”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-286Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 30692Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-286
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 30692
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 183.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-286:183-183.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“30,692”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · goldGrade: 3.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 178.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175-178.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3.61”
Context: 3.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 178.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175-178.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 3.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 4949Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4949
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 178.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175-178.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“4,949”
Context: 3.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · goldGrade: 5.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 177.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175-177.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“5.11”
Context: 2.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 177.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175-177.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: 2.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 6991Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6991
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 177.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175-177.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“6,991”
Context: 2.40
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · goldGrade: 6.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 175.9 m
- To
- 176.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175.9-176.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“6.89”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 3.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 175.9 m
- To
- 176.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175.9-176.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3.78”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-123Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 30000Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-123
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 30000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 175.9 m
- To
- 176.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-123:175.9-176.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“30,000”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · goldGrade: 19.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.7 m
- From
- 69 m
- To
- 81.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:69-81.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional gold intercept over a strong width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Strong intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“19.48”
Context: 12.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.7 m
- From
- 69 m
- To
- 81.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:69-81.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a strong width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 12.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 521Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 521
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12.7 m
- From
- 69 m
- To
- 81.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:69-81.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a strong width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“521”
Context: 12.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · goldGrade: 49.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 49.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 69 m
- To
- 73.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:69-73.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a bonanza gold intercept, well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic deposits, over a moderate width. It is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“49.13”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 69 m
- To
- 73.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:69-73.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1239Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1239
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 69 m
- To
- 73.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:69-73.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1,239”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · goldGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 70.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:70.45-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“4.08”
Context: 0.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 70.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:70.45-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: 0.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 7110Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 7110
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 70.45 m
- To
- 70.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:70.45-70.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“7,110”
Context: 0.45
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · goldGrade: 410.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 410.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 71.4 m
- To
- 71.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:71.4-71.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a bonanza gold intercept, well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic deposits, but over a very narrow width. It is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“410.50”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 71.4 m
- To
- 71.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:71.4-71.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 50Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 50
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 71.4 m
- To
- 71.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 71.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:71.4-71.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“50”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · goldGrade: 69.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 69.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 81.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:81.4-81.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a bonanza gold intercept, well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic deposits, but over a very narrow width. It is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“69.53”
Context: 0.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 81.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:81.4-81.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-05-269Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 50Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-05-269
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 50
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 81.4 m
- To
- 81.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 81.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-05-269:81.4-81.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“50”
Context: 0.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · goldGrade: 14.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“14.02”
Context: 5.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 5.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 2264Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2264
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2,264”
Context: 5.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · goldGrade: 15.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 96.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-96.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“15.08”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 96.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-96.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 2446Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2446
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 96.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-96.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2,446”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · goldGrade: 22.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.03 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 93.97 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93.97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:93.97-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“22.87”
Context: 3.03
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.03 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 93.97 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93.97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:93.97-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 3.03
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 2275Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.03 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2275
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.03 m
- From
- 93.97 m
- To
- 97 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93.97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:93.97-97
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2,275”
Context: 3.03
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.78 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 92.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-92.78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 0.78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.78 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 92.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-92.78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 0.78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 5600Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5600
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.78 m
- From
- 92 m
- To
- 92.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:92-92.78
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“5,600”
Context: 0.78
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · goldGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.68 m
- From
- 95.32 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:95.32-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2.74”
Context: 0.68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.68 m
- From
- 95.32 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:95.32-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 0.68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 2570Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2570
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.68 m
- From
- 95.32 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:95.32-96
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2,570”
Context: 0.68
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · goldGrade: 17.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 96 m
- To
- 96.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:96-96.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“17.06”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 96 m
- To
- 96.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:96-96.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“1.04”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-527Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 8210Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-527
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 8210
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 96 m
- To
- 96.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-527:96-96.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“8,210”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:68-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:68-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 3514Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3514
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:68-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3,514”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.77 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.77 m
- From
- 69.23 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:69.23-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 1.77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.77 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.77 m
- From
- 69.23 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:69.23-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 1.77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 5921Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.77 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5921
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.77 m
- From
- 69.23 m
- To
- 71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:69.23-71
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“5,921”
Context: 1.77
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.43 m
- From
- 69.23 m
- To
- 69.66 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:69.23-69.66
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak gold intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 0.43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 2.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.89
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.43 m
- From
- 69.23 m
- To
- 69.66 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:69.23-69.66
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2.89”
Context: 0.43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-14-529Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 22940Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-14-529
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 22940
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.43 m
- From
- 69.23 m
- To
- 69.66 m
- Intercept Depth
- 69.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-14-529:69.23-69.66
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional tungsten intercept over a narrow width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Exceptional tungsten grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“22,940”
Context: 0.43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-131Monument Bay · goldGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-131
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 34.8 m
- To
- 40.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-131:34.8-40.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: 5.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-131Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-131
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 34.8 m
- To
- 40.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-131:34.8-40.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 5.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-131Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 3344Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-131
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 3344
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 34.8 m
- To
- 40.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-131:34.8-40.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a weak tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Negative factors
- Weak tungsten grade
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“3,344”
Context: 5.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-131Monument Bay · goldGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-131
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 34.8 m
- To
- 38 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-131:34.8-38
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong gold intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for orogenic deposit type
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“2.33”
Context: 3.20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-131Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-131
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 34.8 m
- To
- 38 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-131:34.8-38
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“0.74”
Context: 3.20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
TL-03-131Monument Bay · tungstenGrade: 5900Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TL-03-131
- Project
- Monument Bay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- canada_mb
- Ticker
- ONAU
Geometry
- Grade
- 5900
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 34.8 m
- To
- 38 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TL-03-131:34.8-38
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Camp Shoot
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, sulfur
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate tungsten intercept over a moderate width, but it is historical data being re-evaluated, not new drilling, and lacks current QA/QC disclosure.
Positive factors
- Moderate tungsten grade
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new drilling
- No QA/QC disclosure for current program
Evidence · table
“5,900”
Context: 3.20
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.