P2 Gold Gabbs Project Update: Feasibility Study on Track

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
P2 Gold Inc.
Ticker
PGLD.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver
Document categories
Metallurgy, Economic study, Permitting
Extracted
2026-09-21 10:49:42 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

P2 Gold provides an update on the Gabbs Project in Nevada, confirming that a feasibility study is on track for completion in Q1 2027. The company has outlined a phased production strategy involving both heap leach and mill facilities, with an increased mill throughput of 12 Mtpa to target sulphide mineralization. Metallurgical testing and an updated mineral resource estimate are both expected in late 2026.

Reasoning: The announcement provides a significant update on the project's development path, specifically detailing a phased production approach and increased mill throughput which improves projected recoveries. While it lacks new assay results, the engineering and permitting milestones are clearly defined.

Positive factors

  • Feasibility study on track for Q1 2027
  • Increased mill throughput capacity (12 Mtpa)
  • Higher projected recoveries for sulphide mineralization
  • Successful expansion of known mineralization zones
  • Water rights acquisition secured

Negative factors

  • Metallurgical results for flotation and locked-cycle testing are still pending

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

PFS Completepositive

AACE Class 3 study complete.

Why it applies: The company is currently advancing a feasibility study targeted for Q1 2027.

Evidence · text

“A feasibility study for placing the Gabbs Project in production is targeted for completion in the first quarter of 2027.”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The project plans to utilize a mill facility for sulphide mineralization starting in year three.

Evidence · text

“the feasibility study will now proceed with plans for the mill facility on start up in year three to operate at a rate of 12 million tonnes per year.”

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: The project includes a phased approach using a heap leach facility for oxide and early-stage mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Preproduction, Car Body gold-silver mineralization delivered to the heap leach facility”

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (4)

Fact 1Gabbs · goldRecovery: 94.5 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
PGLD.V

Test Work

Sample
sulphide mineralization for mill facility

Recovery

Recovery
94.5 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 94.5% recovery for gold in the mill route is considered strong.

Positive factors

  • High recovery estimate for sulphide ore

Evidence · text

“Recoveries for milling the sulphide mineralization are estimated to be 94.5% for gold”
Fact 2Gabbs · copperRecovery: 79.9 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
PGLD.V

Test Work

Sample
sulphide mineralization for mill facility

Recovery

Recovery
79.9 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 79.9% copper recovery in a mill route is a solid estimate for sulphide ore.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase over oxide heap leach recoveries

Evidence · text

“and 79.9% for copper”

Tags used in scoring

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 79.9% is below the weak band (80%)

Fact 3Gabbs · goldRecovery: 85 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
PGLD.V

Test Work

Sample
oxide mineralization for heap leach facility

Recovery

Recovery
85 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-10-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Standard recovery for oxide heap leach.

Evidence · text

“estimated to be 85% for gold”
Fact 4Gabbs · copperRecovery: 67 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
PGLD.V

Test Work

Sample
oxide mineralization for heap leach facility

Recovery

Recovery
67 %
Recovery Basis
unspecified

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-10-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Standard recovery for oxide heap leach.

Evidence · text

“and 67% for copper”

Tags used in scoring

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 67% is below the weak band (80%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.