Pacific Coal Resources Ltd. Announces 2015 Second Quarter Financial Results and Operational Update

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Pacific Coal Resources Ltd.
Ticker
PAK
Exchange
TSX
Region
Colombia
Primary commodity
Coal
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Production, Agreement transaction
Extracted
2026-09-13 19:32:02 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Pacific Coal Resources reported a net loss of $7.15 million for Q2 2015, driven by lower coal sales and declining realized prices. Despite the financial downturn, the company entered a debt restructuring agreement with Masering and is negotiating the potential purchase of the Cerro Largo mine.

Reasoning: The company reported a significant net loss and declining revenues/prices, though it successfully restructured its largest debt and is pursuing strategic asset acquisitions.

Positive factors

  • debt restructuring agreement with Masering
  • reduction in G&A expenses
  • potential purchase of Cerro Largo mine

Negative factors

  • significant net loss for the quarter
  • deterioration of international coal market
  • decrease in coal sales and realized price
  • operating margin turned negative

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

Nearology Playneutral · Story-specific tag

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The company's value is tied to its specific coal assets in Colombia (La Caypa and Cerro Largo).

Evidence · text

“engaged in the acquisition, exploration and production of coal and coal-related assets from properties located in Colombia.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

Fact 1coalIntercept: 238241 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
coal
Region
colombia
Reported Region
colombia
Ticker
PAK

Geometry

Intercept
238241 m

Classification

Program
other
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2015-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Production volume is down year-over-year but shows slight sequential growth.

Positive factors

  • 7% increase compared to Q1 2015

Negative factors

  • lower than Q2 2014 and Q2 2013 levels

Evidence · text

“The Company produced 238,241 tonnes of coal in the second quarter of 2015”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 2coalGrade: 68.3Grade Unit: $Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
coal
Region
colombia
Reported Region
colombia
Ticker
PAK

Geometry

Grade
68.3
Grade Unit
$

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2015-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Realized price has dropped significantly due to international market conditions.

Negative factors

  • significant decrease from $95.39 in Q2 2014

Evidence · text

“average realized price of $68.30 per tonne”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.