# Pasofino Gold Engages MineScope Services to Conduct Phase One Feasibility Study Update at Dugbe Gold Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/pasofino-gold-engages-minescope-services-to-conduct-phase-one-feasibility-study--902a03fd-4eb1-437d-b99d-3f7a06a167da

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/VEIN/news/6954580794424047/pasofino-gold-engages-minescope-services-to-conduct-phase-one-feasibility-study-

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-06-03T11:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Pasofino Gold Limited

- Ticker: VEIN

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Liberia

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Economic study, Other, Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-09-19 04:47:18 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Pasofino Gold has engaged MineScope Services to begin a two-phase update of the Dugbe Gold Project's 2022 Feasibility Study. The update aims to optimize the existing study and incorporate current costing and gold price environments to expedite the project toward final feasibility and construction.

Reasoning: The announcement is a corporate update regarding the commencement of a two-phase process to update a previous Feasibility Study. While not new technical results, it signals progress toward project financing and construction.

- Positive factor: Engagement of MineScope to update the 2022 Feasibility Study

- Positive factor: Focus on optimization and costing updates to enhance economic outputs

- Positive factor: Stable geopolitical environment in Liberia

- Positive factor: Existing Mineral Development Agreement \(MDA\) provides fiscal stability

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**PFS Complete**

Polarity: positive

Definition: AACE Class 3 study complete.

Why it applies: The company is updating a 2022 feasibility study, which was previously a BFS/FS level document.

Evidence · text

> to deliver an updated feasibility study \( "FS" \) for Dugbe as soon as possible.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (1)

### Tuzon and Dugbe F pits

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/pasofino-gold-engages-minescope-services-to-conduct-phase-one-feasibility-study--902a03fd-4eb1-437d-b99d-3f7a06a167da#fact-resource-facts-1)

Dugbe Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Dugbe Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: liberia
- Reported Region: Liberia
- Ticker: VEIN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: reserve
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- Resource group id: resource:abad6c9cb3fcfbc8854d
- Deposit or zone: Tuzon and Dugbe F pits
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Tonnes: 66000000
- Grade: 1.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 2760
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of the Mineral Reserve Estimate from the 2022 Feasibility Study.

Evidence · text

> The Mineral Reserve Estimate has 66Mt at a grade of 1.30 Au g/t with a total of 2,760koz.

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.