# Patronus Resources maps 1.5km Pine Creek gold target in the NT

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/patronus-resources-maps-1-5km-pine-creek-gold-target-in-the-nt--c04d1060-6200-4151-a756-eb27359f5d04

Original source: https://stockhead.com.au/resources/patronus-resources-maps-1-5km-pine-creek-gold-target-in-the-nt/

Publisher: stockhead

Original announcement: 2026-09-08T01:26:04.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Patronus Resources

- Ticker: PTN

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Northern Territory

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-12 00:55:56 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Patronus Resources has defined a 1.5km long gold anomaly at its J25 target within the Pine Creek project using infill surface sampling. The results include individual surface grades of up to 0.99 g/t Au, strengthening a structural trend in the Western Shear Zone.

Reasoning: Infill surface sampling has extended a coherent gold anomaly to 1.5km at the J25 target, with grades up to 0.99 g/t Au.

- Positive factor: coherent 1.5km anomaly

- Positive factor: surface grades approaching 1g/t Au

- Positive factor: structural trend target

Facts used in scoring: 4

## Classification and evidence

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The release describes infill surface sampling to refine previously identified anomalies.

Evidence · text

> Infill sampling refines more targets across Pine Creek

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (4)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/patronus-resources-maps-1-5km-pine-creek-gold-target-in-the-nt--c04d1060-6200-4151-a756-eb27359f5d04#fact-drill-facts-0)

Pine Creek · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: Northern Territory
- Ticker: PTN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.99
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: J25
- Loc. Source: document

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface sample grade of 0.99 g/t Au is strong for an anomaly definition.

- Positive factor: high surface grade

Evidence · text

> individual surface results of up to 0.99g/t

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At Burnside SW, lag sampling refined the Cardamom and Bay Leaf anomalies along strike of the Brock’s Creek Shear, adjace"

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/patronus-resources-maps-1-5km-pine-creek-gold-target-in-the-nt--c04d1060-6200-4151-a756-eb27359f5d04#fact-drill-facts-1)

Pine Creek · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: Northern Territory
- Ticker: PTN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.57
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: J25
- Loc. Source: document

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface sample grade of 0.57 g/t Au contributes to anomaly definition.

- Positive factor: anomalous grade

Evidence · text

> 0.57g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At Burnside SW, lag sampling refined the Cardamom and Bay Leaf anomalies along strike of the Brock’s Creek Shear, adjace"

### Fact 3

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/patronus-resources-maps-1-5km-pine-creek-gold-target-in-the-nt--c04d1060-6200-4151-a756-eb27359f5d04#fact-drill-facts-2)

Pine Creek · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: Northern Territory
- Ticker: PTN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.21
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: J25
- Loc. Source: document

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical anomalous result being refined by infill.

- Positive factor: anomalous grade

Evidence · text

> earlier anomalous results of 0.21g/t

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At Burnside SW, lag sampling refined the Cardamom and Bay Leaf anomalies along strike of the Brock’s Creek Shear, adjace"

### Fact 4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/patronus-resources-maps-1-5km-pine-creek-gold-target-in-the-nt--c04d1060-6200-4151-a756-eb27359f5d04#fact-drill-facts-3)

Pine Creek · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Pine Creek
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: Northern Territory
- Ticker: PTN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.22
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: J25
- Loc. Source: document

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical anomalous result being refined by infill.

- Positive factor: anomalous grade

Evidence · text

> 0.22g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "At Burnside SW, lag sampling refined the Cardamom and Bay Leaf anomalies along strike of the Brock’s Creek Shear, adjace"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
