# Power Metallic intercepts 17.45 Meters of 9.47% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 26-094 and 39 Meters of 5.66% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 26-101 at Lion

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/power-metallic-intercepts-17-45-meters-of-9-47-cueqrec1-in-hole-26-094-and-39-me--a807104a-a2ec-4043-ad01-e187bbad8a57

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/energy/articles/power-metallic-intercepts-17-45-063000632.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2026-05-04T06:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Power Metallic Mines Inc.

- Ticker: PNPN

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: Unavailable

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-09-19 10:12:09 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Power Metallic Mines Inc. has reported high-grade copper equivalent intercepts from its winter 2026 drill program at the Lion project. Notable results include 17.45m at 9.47% CuEq in hole 26-094 and 39m at 5.66% CuEq in hole 26-101.

Reasoning: The announcement reports two high-grade copper equivalent intercepts \(9.47% and 5.66% CuEq\) with substantial widths \(17.45m and 39m\), which are significantly above the project's prior average copper grade of 1.756%.

- Positive factor: High-grade copper equivalent intercepts

- Positive factor: Significant interval widths

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Bonanza Intercept**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 9.47% CuEq is exceptionally high for a copper-focused project.

Evidence · text

> 17.45 Meters of 9.47% CuEqRec¹

**Metal Equivalent Opaque**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: The release uses 'CuEqRec' without disclosing the specific price, recovery, or payability assumptions used for the calculation.

Evidence · text

> 9.47% CuEqRec¹

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (2)

### 26-094

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/power-metallic-intercepts-17-45-meters-of-9-47-cueqrec1-in-hole-26-094-and-39-me--a807104a-a2ec-4043-ad01-e187bbad8a57#fact-drill-facts-0)

Lion · copper

#### Identity

- Hole ID: 26-094
- Project: Lion
- Commodity: copper
- Ticker: PNPN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 9.47
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 17.45 m

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 9.47
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEqRec¹
- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high grade intercept with significant width.

- Positive factor: High grade

- Negative factor: Opaque equivalent assumptions

Evidence · text

> 17.45 Meters of 9.47% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 26-094

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Metal Equivalent Opaque**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

### 26-101

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/power-metallic-intercepts-17-45-meters-of-9-47-cueqrec1-in-hole-26-094-and-39-me--a807104a-a2ec-4043-ad01-e187bbad8a57#fact-drill-facts-1)

Lion · copper

#### Identity

- Hole ID: 26-101
- Project: Lion
- Commodity: copper
- Ticker: PNPN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 5.66
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 39 m

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 5.66
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEqRec¹
- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade and very wide intercept.

- Positive factor: High grade

- Positive factor: Large width

- Negative factor: Opaque equivalent assumptions

Evidence · text

> 39 Meters of 5.66% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 26-101

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Metal Equivalent Opaque**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
