Proposed acquisition of Cygnus Metals Limited by Central Asia Metals PLC for A$232 million

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Cygnus Metals Limited
Ticker
CYG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Québec, Canada
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Resource update, Agreement transaction
Extracted
2026-09-15 18:45:14 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Central Asia Metals PLC (CAML) proposes to acquire Cygnus Metals Limited for A$232 million via a scheme of arrangement, offering Cygnus shareholders 0.06 new CAML shares per Cygnus share. The acquisition adds Cygnus's Chibougamau Copper-Gold Project in Québec, Canada, to CAML's portfolio, enhancing scale and diversification. The Chibougamau Project's Mineral Resource Estimate, effective September 17, 2025, includes 6.4 million tonnes at 2.3% Cu, 0.8 g/t Au, and 7.6 g/t Ag in the Measured and Indicated categories, plus 8.5 million tonnes at 2.1% Cu, 1.7 g/t Au, and 7.9 g/t Ag in the Inferred category.

Reasoning: The proposed acquisition offers a significant premium to Cygnus shareholders and strategically enhances CAML's portfolio with a high-grade copper-gold project in a tier-one jurisdiction, supported by a substantial and well-reported mineral resource estimate.

Positive factors

  • Acquisition offers significant premium to Cygnus shareholders
  • Strategic asset addition for CAML in a tier-one jurisdiction
  • High-grade copper-gold resource with substantial contained metal
  • Resource estimate reported under JORC and NI 43-101 standards
  • Qualified Person (QP) sign-off for the resource estimate
  • Transparent metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Significant portion of the resource is in the Inferred category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement from a prior release, limiting novelty for the resource itself

Facts used in scoring: 74

Classification and evidence

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate is reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012.

Evidence · text

“reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate is reported in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards (CIM, 2014) in NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“CIM Definition Standards (CIM, 2014) in NI 43-101”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The scientific and technical information has been reviewed and approved by Louis Beaupre, a 'qualified person' for NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Louis Beaupre, the Quebec Exploration Manager of Cygnus, who is a ‘qualified person’ for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Cut-off grades are clearly stated for each deposit within the resource estimate.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Resources are estimated at a CuEq cut-off grade of 1.2% for Corner Bay and 1.5% CuEq for Devlin. A cut-off grade of 1.8 g/t AuEq was used for Cedar Bay and Golden Eye; and 2.0 g/t AuEq for Joe Mann.”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the total resource (8.5 million tonnes) is in the Inferred category.

Evidence · text

“8.5 million tonnes at a 2.1% Cu grade, 1.7g/t Au grade and 7.9g/t Ag grade in the Inferred Resource category”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is intended to support an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).

Evidence · text

“Updated PEA study* is already under way and would be completed by CAML”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is a re-statement from a prior release dated September 17, 2025, limiting its novelty.

Evidence · text

“The latest Mineral Resource Estimate (‘ MRE’ ) published by Cygnus in late 2025 for the Chibougamau Project”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 74. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (74)

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 4900000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 124Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:8cd8135ab493e08459cc
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4900000
Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
124
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This indicated resource for Corner Bay shows a strong copper grade and significant contained metal, contributing materially to the project's overall resource base.

Positive factors

  • High copper grade
  • Significant contained metal
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 4900000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 43Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:8cd8135ab493e08459cc
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4900000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
43
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold grade at Corner Bay provides a valuable byproduct credit to the copper-focused resource.

Positive factors

  • Contained gold adds value
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 4900000Grade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1316Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:8cd8135ab493e08459cc
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4900000
Grade
8.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1316
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated silver grade at Corner Bay provides a valuable byproduct credit to the copper-focused resource.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“8.4”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 4900000Contained Metal: 137Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:8cd8135ab493e08459cc
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4900000
Contained Metal
137
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated copper equivalent grade for Corner Bay highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.8”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 4900000Contained Metal: 638Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:8cd8135ab493e08459cc
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4900000
Contained Metal
638
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold equivalent grade for Corner Bay highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.1”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 5400000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 146Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:f591db531297be23a3a8
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5400000
Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
146
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource at Corner Bay shows a strong copper grade and significant contained metal, indicating good exploration potential, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • High copper grade
  • Significant contained metal

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 5400000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 41Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:f591db531297be23a3a8
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5400000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
41
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold grade at Corner Bay provides a valuable byproduct credit, but its inferred status requires further validation.

Positive factors

  • Contained gold adds value

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 5400000Grade: 8.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1543Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:f591db531297be23a3a8
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5400000
Grade
8.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1543
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred silver grade at Corner Bay provides a valuable byproduct credit, but its inferred status requires further validation.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“8.9”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 5400000Contained Metal: 159Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:f591db531297be23a3a8
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5400000
Contained Metal
159
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred copper equivalent grade for Corner Bay highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.0”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 5400000Contained Metal: 744Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:f591db531297be23a3a8
Deposit or zone
Corner Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5400000
Contained Metal
744
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold equivalent grade for Corner Bay highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 100000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:04af8e62dcb5b845b4a6
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
4
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured resource at Devlin shows a high copper grade, providing high confidence for this smaller tonnage.

Positive factors

  • High copper grade
  • Measured resource category

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:04af8e62dcb5b845b4a6
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured gold grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit with high confidence.

Positive factors

  • Measured resource category

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:04af8e62dcb5b845b4a6
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured silver grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit with high confidence.

Positive factors

  • Measured resource category

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 100000Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:04af8e62dcb5b845b4a6
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Contained Metal
4
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured copper equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, for this smaller tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Measured resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 100000Contained Metal: 19Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:04af8e62dcb5b845b4a6
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Contained Metal
19
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured gold equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, for this smaller tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Measured resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.7”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 600000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 13000Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:33f587febe5e2c790702
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
600000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
13000
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated resource at Devlin shows a good copper grade, providing confidence for this tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 600000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:33f587febe5e2c790702
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
600000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 600000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:33f587febe5e2c790702
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
600000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated silver grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 600000Contained Metal: 13000Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:33f587febe5e2c790702
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
600000
Contained Metal
13000
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated copper equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 600000Contained Metal: 69Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:33f587febe5e2c790702
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
600000
Contained Metal
69
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Good gold equivalent grade
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 800000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 16Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:d3659bf5d9620ccd4099
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
800000
Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
16
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I resource at Devlin shows a good copper grade, providing confidence for this tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 800000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:d3659bf5d9620ccd4099
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
800000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I gold grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 800000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:d3659bf5d9620ccd4099
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
800000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
7
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I silver grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 800000Contained Metal: 17Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:d3659bf5d9620ccd4099
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
800000
Contained Metal
17
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I copper equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 800000Contained Metal: 88Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:d3659bf5d9620ccd4099
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
800000
Contained Metal
88
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I gold equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Good gold equivalent grade
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 300000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 7Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:db79c4bc903644d4f6e4
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
300000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
7
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource at Devlin shows a good copper grade, indicating potential, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 300000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:db79c4bc903644d4f6e4
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
300000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit, but its inferred status requires further validation.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 300000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:db79c4bc903644d4f6e4
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
300000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred silver grade at Devlin provides a minor byproduct credit, but its inferred status requires further validation.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 300000Contained Metal: 7Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:db79c4bc903644d4f6e4
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
300000
Contained Metal
7
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred copper equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 300000Contained Metal: 36Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:db79c4bc903644d4f6e4
Deposit or zone
Devlin
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
300000
Contained Metal
36
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold equivalent grade for Devlin highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good gold equivalent grade
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 700000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:3237a70cabba18b90b43
Deposit or zone
Joe Mann
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred copper grade at Joe Mann is low, but contributes to the overall polymetallic resource.

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 700000Grade: 6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 143Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:3237a70cabba18b90b43
Deposit or zone
Joe Mann
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Grade
6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
143
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource at Joe Mann shows a very high gold grade, indicating significant potential, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • High gold grade
  • Significant contained gold

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“6.0”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 700000Contained Metal: 34Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:3237a70cabba18b90b43
Deposit or zone
Joe Mann
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Contained Metal
34
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.6
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred copper equivalent grade for Joe Mann highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 700000Contained Metal: 151Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:3237a70cabba18b90b43
Deposit or zone
Joe Mann
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
700000
Contained Metal
151
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold equivalent grade for Joe Mann highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“6.3”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 300000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:50ba12b1c275e0dfb28b
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
300000
Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
4
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated resource at Cedar Bay shows a good copper grade, contributing to the overall polymetallic resource with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 300000Grade: 6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 50Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:50ba12b1c275e0dfb28b
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
300000
Grade
6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
50
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated resource at Cedar Bay shows a very high gold grade, providing significant value with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • High gold grade
  • Significant contained gold
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“6.0”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 300000Grade: 9.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 82Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:50ba12b1c275e0dfb28b
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
300000
Grade
9.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
82
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated silver grade at Cedar Bay provides a valuable byproduct credit with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“9.9”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 300000Contained Metal: 16Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:50ba12b1c275e0dfb28b
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
300000
Contained Metal
16
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated copper equivalent grade for Cedar Bay highlights the combined high value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“6.4”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 300000Contained Metal: 67Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:50ba12b1c275e0dfb28b
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
300000
Contained Metal
67
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold equivalent grade for Cedar Bay highlights the combined high value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“8.1”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 800000Grade: 2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 17Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:79c9fe160804e99ae4aa
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
800000
Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
17
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource at Cedar Bay shows a good copper grade, contributing to the overall polymetallic resource, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 800000Grade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 134Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:79c9fe160804e99ae4aa
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
800000
Grade
5.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
134
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource at Cedar Bay shows a high gold grade, indicating significant potential, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • High gold grade
  • Significant contained gold

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“5.1”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 800000Grade: 11.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 309Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:79c9fe160804e99ae4aa
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
800000
Grade
11.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
309
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred silver grade at Cedar Bay provides a valuable byproduct credit, but its inferred status requires further validation.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“11.8”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 800000Contained Metal: 50Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:79c9fe160804e99ae4aa
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
800000
Contained Metal
50
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred copper equivalent grade for Cedar Bay highlights the combined high value of the polymetallic resource, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“6.1”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 800000Contained Metal: 205Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:79c9fe160804e99ae4aa
Deposit or zone
Cedar Bay
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
800000
Contained Metal
205
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold equivalent grade for Cedar Bay highlights the combined high value of the polymetallic resource, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“7.8”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 500000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 5Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:2bb092a18119623ec64a
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
500000
Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
5
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated resource at Golden Eye shows a moderate copper grade, contributing to the overall polymetallic resource with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 500000Grade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 69Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:2bb092a18119623ec64a
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
500000
Grade
4.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
69
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated resource at Golden Eye shows a high gold grade, providing significant value with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • High gold grade
  • Significant contained gold
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 500000Grade: 9.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 161Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:2bb092a18119623ec64a
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
500000
Grade
9.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
161
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated silver grade at Golden Eye provides a valuable byproduct credit with good confidence.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“9.9”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 500000Contained Metal: 22Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:2bb092a18119623ec64a
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
500000
Contained Metal
22
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated copper equivalent grade for Golden Eye highlights the combined high value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.4”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 500000Contained Metal: 91Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:2bb092a18119623ec64a
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
500000
Contained Metal
91
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold equivalent grade for Golden Eye highlights the combined high value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“5.6”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 11Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:28219b2f4f3eeed1adba
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1200000
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
11
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource at Golden Eye shows a moderate copper grade, contributing to the overall polymetallic resource, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.9”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 1200000Grade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 134Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:28219b2f4f3eeed1adba
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1200000
Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
134
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource at Golden Eye shows a high gold grade, indicating significant potential, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • High gold grade
  • Significant contained gold

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 1200000Grade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 313Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:28219b2f4f3eeed1adba
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1200000
Grade
7.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
313
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred silver grade at Golden Eye provides a valuable byproduct credit, but its inferred status requires further validation.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“7.9”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 1200000Contained Metal: 45Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:28219b2f4f3eeed1adba
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1200000
Contained Metal
45
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.6
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred copper equivalent grade for Golden Eye highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 1200000Contained Metal: 182Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:28219b2f4f3eeed1adba
Deposit or zone
Golden Eye
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1200000
Contained Metal
182
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.8
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold equivalent grade for Golden Eye highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 100000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:efbb2c421062994f02a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
4
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured resource for the Hub and Spoke project shows a high copper grade, providing high confidence for this smaller tonnage.

Positive factors

  • High copper grade
  • Measured resource category

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:efbb2c421062994f02a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured gold grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a minor byproduct credit with high confidence.

Positive factors

  • Measured resource category

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:efbb2c421062994f02a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured silver grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a minor byproduct credit with high confidence.

Positive factors

  • Measured resource category

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 100000Contained Metal: 4Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:efbb2c421062994f02a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Contained Metal
4
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured copper equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, for this smaller tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Measured resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 100000Contained Metal: 19Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:efbb2c421062994f02a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
100000
Contained Metal
19
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The measured gold equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, for this smaller tonnage.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Measured resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Small tonnage
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.7”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 6300000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 146Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:5afa3114236a174d23a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6300000
Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
146
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated resource for the Hub and Spoke project shows a strong copper grade and significant contained metal, contributing materially to the project's overall resource base.

Positive factors

  • High copper grade
  • Significant contained metal
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 6.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 6300000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 166Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:5afa3114236a174d23a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6300000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
166
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a valuable credit to the copper-focused resource.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Significant contained gold
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.8”

Context: 6.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 6300000Grade: 7.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1563Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:5afa3114236a174d23a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6300000
Grade
7.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1563
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated silver grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a valuable byproduct credit to the copper-focused resource.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“7.8”

Context: 6.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 6300000Contained Metal: 189Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:5afa3114236a174d23a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6300000
Contained Metal
189
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated copper equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.0”

Context: 6.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 6300000Contained Metal: 865Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:5afa3114236a174d23a0
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6300000
Contained Metal
865
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated gold equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: 6.3

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 6400000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 149Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:e5cb9ec5f300c1bf35b5
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6400000
Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
149
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I resource for the Hub and Spoke project shows a strong copper grade and significant contained metal, contributing materially to the project's overall resource base.

Positive factors

  • High copper grade
  • Significant contained metal
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 6400000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 167000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:e5cb9ec5f300c1bf35b5
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6400000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
167000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I gold grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a valuable credit to the copper-focused resource.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Significant contained gold
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“0.8”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 6400000Grade: 7.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1565Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:e5cb9ec5f300c1bf35b5
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6400000
Grade
7.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1565
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I silver grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a valuable byproduct credit to the copper-focused resource.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value
  • Indicated resource category

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“7.6”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 6400000Contained Metal: 193Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:e5cb9ec5f300c1bf35b5
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6400000
Contained Metal
193
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I copper equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.0”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 6400000Contained Metal: 884Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:e5cb9ec5f300c1bf35b5
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6400000
Contained Metal
884
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The M&I gold equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Indicated resource category
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.3”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 8500000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 182000Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:9f9d5c98b12ed1816659
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8500000
Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
182000
Contained Unit
t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred resource for the Hub and Spoke project shows a good copper grade and significant contained metal, indicating good exploration potential, though requiring further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • Significant contained metal

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 8.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 8500000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 454000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:9f9d5c98b12ed1816659
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8500000
Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
454000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a significant credit to the copper-focused resource, indicating good exploration potential.

Positive factors

  • High gold grade
  • Significant contained gold

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: 8.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · silverTonnes: 8500000Grade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2168Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:9f9d5c98b12ed1816659
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8500000
Grade
7.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2168
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred silver grade for the Hub and Spoke project provides a valuable byproduct credit, but its inferred status requires further validation.

Positive factors

  • Contained silver adds value

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“7.9”

Context: 8.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · copperTonnes: 8500000Contained Metal: 295Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:9f9d5c98b12ed1816659
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8500000
Contained Metal
295
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred copper equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: 8.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredChibougamau Project · goldTonnes: 8500000Contained Metal: 1318Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chibougamau Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec, Canada
Ticker
CYG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
jorc, ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Louis Beaupre
Resource group id
resource:9f9d5c98b12ed1816659
Deposit or zone
Hub and Spoke
Mining method
underground

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8500000
Contained Metal
1318
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-17

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred gold equivalent grade for the Hub and Spoke project highlights the combined value of the polymetallic resource, with transparent calculation assumptions, but requires further drilling for confidence upgrade.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant contained metal equivalent
  • Assumptions for metal equivalent calculation disclosed

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category
  • Resource estimate is a re-statement

Evidence · table

“4.8”

Context: 8.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.