Provenance Gold Intersects 1.82 g/t Gold over 116.74m Including 8.31 g/t Gold over 12.34m at Eldorado West

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
Provenance Gold Corp.
Ticker
PAU
Exchange
CSE
Region
Eastern Oregon
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-20 16:04:20 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Provenance Gold Corp. has released assay results from the final three holes of its 2025 core drilling program at the Eldorado West Project in Oregon. The results feature a significant 116.74m intercept at 1.82 g/t gold, highlighted by a high-grade 12.34m interval at 8.31 g/t gold.

Reasoning: The announcement reports a substantial gold intercept of 1.82 g/t over 116.74m, including a high-grade bonanza-style interval of 8.31 g/t over 12.34m, concluding a core drilling campaign.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept width
  • High-grade inclusion

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 8.31 g/t gold over 12.34m is a high-grade zone for an orogenic/epithermal style deposit.

Evidence · text

“8.31 g/t Gold over 12.34m”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The results represent the conclusion of a core drilling campaign at the Eldorado West Project.

Evidence · text

“final three diamond drill holes (EC-07, EC-08, and EC-09) of the 2025 core drilling program”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

EC-09Eldorado West · goldGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 116.74 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EC-09
Project
Eldorado West
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern oregon
Reported Region
eastern oregon
Ticker
PAU

Geometry

Grade
1.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
116.74 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Large width intercept at moderate grade.

Positive factors

  • Large width

Evidence · text

“1.82 g/t Gold over 116.74m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

EC-09Eldorado West · goldGrade: 8.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.34 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EC-09
Project
Eldorado West
Commodity
gold
Region
eastern oregon
Reported Region
eastern oregon
Ticker
PAU

Geometry

Grade
8.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.34 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EC-09:0-12.34
Mining Method
unknown

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade interval within the larger intercept.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Evidence · text

“8.31 g/t Gold over 12.34m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.