Q2 Metals Reports Multiple Wide, Mineralized Intercepts at the Cisco Lithium Project, Including 272.5 Metres at 1.61% Li20

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
Unavailable
Ticker
QTWO
Exchange
TSXV
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 13:17:08 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Metals Reports has announced strong drill results from its 2025 program at the Cisco Lithium Project. Notable intercepts include 272.5 metres at 1.61% Li2O and several other wide intervals exceeding 1.5% Li2O.

Reasoning: The announcement reports multiple wide, high-grade lithium intercepts, including a very significant 272.5m interval at 1.61% Li2O, demonstrating strong mineralisation continuity.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept width and grade
  • Multiple high-grade intervals reported
  • Continuous drilling activity

Facts used in scoring: 7

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The report highlights multiple wide mineralized intercepts from a current drill program, suggesting expansion of known mineralisation.

Evidence · text

“Multiple Wide, Mineralized Intercepts at the Cisco Lithium Project”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (7)

CS25-036Cisco · lithiumGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 272.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CS25-036
Project
Cisco
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
QTWO

Geometry

Grade
1.61
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
272.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 272.5m at 1.61% Li2O is an exceptionally wide and high-grade lithium intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional width and grade

Evidence · text

“CS25-036: nine (9) separate intervals, the widest being 272.5 m at 1.61% Li2O”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CS25-038Cisco · lithiumGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 66.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CS25-038
Project
Cisco
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
QTWO

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
66.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant intercept of 66.5m at 1.55% Li2O.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width

Evidence · text

“CS25-038: 17 separate intervals, the widest being 66.5 m at 1.55% Li2O”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CS25-038Cisco · lithiumGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 58.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CS25-038
Project
Cisco
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
QTWO

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
58.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Secondary wide intercept of 58.9m at 1.09% Li2O.

Positive factors

  • Solid width and grade

Evidence · text

“58.9 m at 1.09% Li2O”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CS25-039Cisco · lithiumGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 108.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CS25-039
Project
Cisco
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
QTWO

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
108.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong intercept of 108.5m at 1.62% Li2O.

Positive factors

  • High grade and significant width

Evidence · text

“108.5 m at 1.62% Li2O”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CS25-039Cisco · lithiumGrade: 1.84Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 71 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CS25-039
Project
Cisco
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
QTWO

Geometry

Grade
1.84
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
71 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade intercept of 71.0m at 1.84% Li2O.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Evidence · text

“71.0 m at 1.84% Li2O”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CS25-039Cisco · lithiumGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 77.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CS25-039
Project
Cisco
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
QTWO

Geometry

Grade
1.48
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
77.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wide intercept of 77.7m at 1.48% Li2O.

Positive factors

  • Solid width and grade

Evidence · text

“77.7 m at 1.48% Li2O”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CS25-039Cisco · lithiumGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 107.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CS25-039
Project
Cisco
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
QTWO

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
107.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade intercept of 107.4m at 1.87% Li2O.

Positive factors

  • High grade and significant width

Evidence · text

“107.4 m at 1.87% Li2O”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.