QcX Gold Identifies Lithium Potential on Golden Giant Project, James Bay Quebec

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
QcX Gold Corp.
Ticker
QCX
Exchange
TSX
Region
James Bay region of Québec
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver, Zinc, Gold
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-16 19:27:54 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

QcX Gold Corp. announced the identification of lithium potential on its Golden Giant Project in the James Bay region of Québec, based on assay results from 51 grab samples. The highest lithium grade returned was 48.4 ppm, with other samples showing anomalous copper and silver. This initial prospecting on the Kali East Block, located near a major lithium deposit, suggests the presence of LCT-type pegmatite mineralization, warranting further exploration, though reported grades are very low.

Reasoning: The company identified new lithium potential on its Golden Giant Project through grab samples, but the reported grades for lithium (up to 48.4 ppm Li), copper (up to 0.15%), zinc, gold, and silver are all very low and not economically significant, indicating very early-stage exploration with no immediate economic implications.

Positive factors

  • new lithium potential identified
  • proximity to a large lithium project
  • anomalous results for multiple commodities

Negative factors

  • grab samples are not representative
  • no true width
  • no drill results
  • all reported grades (Li, Cu, Zn, Au, Ag) are extremely low and well below economic thresholds, making the 'anomalous' description misleading
  • no specific QA/QC methods disclosed beyond QP sign-off

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 199

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 199. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (199)

Fact 1Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356822
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058501

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 2Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356822
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: E6058501

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 3Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356822
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1”

Context: E6058501

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 4Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356822
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058502

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 5Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
5.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356822
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 5.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“5.8”

Context: E6058502

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 6Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356822
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: E6058502

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 7Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356822
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 1.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.2”

Context: E6058502

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 8Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356820
Northing
5797328
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058503

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 9Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356820
Northing
5797328
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 3.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: E6058503

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 10Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356820
Northing
5797328
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: E6058503

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 11Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356820
Northing
5797328
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.8”

Context: E6058503

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 12Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
5.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356818
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 5.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“5.2”

Context: E6058504

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 13Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
6.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356818
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 6.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“6.5”

Context: E6058504

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 14Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356818
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 1.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: E6058504

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 15Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356815
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058505

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 16Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356815
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.04 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: E6058505

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 17Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 38.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
38.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356815
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 38.4 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“38.4”

Context: E6058505

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 18Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 14.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
14.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356815
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 14.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“14.8”

Context: E6058505

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 19Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356815
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“6”

Context: E6058505

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 20Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356816
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058506

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 21Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356816
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.05 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: E6058506

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 22Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 114Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
114
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356816
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 114 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“114”

Context: E6058506

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 23Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 37.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
37.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356816
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 37.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“37.6”

Context: E6058506

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 24Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 28.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
28.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356816
Northing
5797287
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 28.8 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“28.8”

Context: E6058506

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 25Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356776
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058507

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 26Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356776
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058507

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 27Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 8.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
8.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356776
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 8.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“8.3”

Context: E6058507

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 28Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 40.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
40.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356776
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 40.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“40.9”

Context: E6058507

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 29Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
16.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356776
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 16.8 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“16.8”

Context: E6058507

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 30Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797333
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058508

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 31Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797333
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.05 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: E6058508

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 32Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 9.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
9.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797333
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 9.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“9.8”

Context: E6058508

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 33Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 20.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
20.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797333
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 20.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“20.7”

Context: E6058508

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 34Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
10.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797333
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 10.6 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“10.6”

Context: E6058508

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 35Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356772
Northing
5797330
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058509

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 36Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356772
Northing
5797330
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.04 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: E6058509

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 37Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 19.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
19.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356772
Northing
5797330
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 19.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“19.6”

Context: E6058509

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 38Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 8.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
8.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356772
Northing
5797330
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 8.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“8.1”

Context: E6058509

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 39Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356772
Northing
5797330
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 2.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: E6058509

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 40Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.09 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: E6058510

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 41Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.16 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: E6058510

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 42Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 57.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
57.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 57.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“57.1”

Context: E6058510

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 43Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 98.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
98.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 98.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“98.1”

Context: E6058510

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 44Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 20.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
20.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356766
Northing
5797319
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 20.5 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“20.5”

Context: E6058510

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 45Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356764
Northing
5797305
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“9”

Context: E6058511

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 46Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356764
Northing
5797305
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.8”

Context: E6058511

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 47Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356764
Northing
5797305
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 1.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: E6058511

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 48Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356775
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058512

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 49Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356775
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.03 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: E6058512

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 50Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 8.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
8.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356775
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 8.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“8.1”

Context: E6058512

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 51Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 39.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
39.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356775
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 39.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“39.7”

Context: E6058512

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 52Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 17.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
17.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356775
Northing
5797320
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 17.2 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“17.2”

Context: E6058512

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 53Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356773
Northing
5797321
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058513

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 54Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356773
Northing
5797321
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.08 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: E6058513

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 55Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356773
Northing
5797321
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 0.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: E6058513

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 56Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356773
Northing
5797321
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 1.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: E6058513

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 57Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356773
Northing
5797321
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: E6058513

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 58Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356590
Northing
5797311
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 3.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: E6058514

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 59Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356590
Northing
5797311
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: E6058514

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 60Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356590
Northing
5797311
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: E6058514

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 61Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356715
Northing
5796697
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058515

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 62Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356715
Northing
5796697
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.14 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: E6058515

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 63Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 158Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
158
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356715
Northing
5796697
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 158 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“158”

Context: E6058515

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 64Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 34.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
34.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356715
Northing
5796697
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 34.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“34.9”

Context: E6058515

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 65Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 14Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356715
Northing
5796697
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 14 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“14”

Context: E6058515

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 66Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356558
Northing
5796632
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058516

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 67Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356558
Northing
5796632
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058516

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 68Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 46.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
46.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356558
Northing
5796632
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 46.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“46.8”

Context: E6058516

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 69Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 22.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
22.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356558
Northing
5796632
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 22.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“22.1”

Context: E6058516

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 70Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 48.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
48.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356558
Northing
5796632
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 48.4 ppm is the highest in the release but remains very low and not economically significant, indicating very early-stage exploration.

Positive factors

  • highest lithium grade reported

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“48.4”

Context: E6058516

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 71Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356387
Northing
5796783
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058517

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 72Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356387
Northing
5796783
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.13 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: E6058517

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 73Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
13.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356387
Northing
5796783
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 13.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“13.3”

Context: E6058517

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 74Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 112Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
112
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356387
Northing
5796783
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 112 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“112”

Context: E6058517

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 75Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356387
Northing
5796783
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 4.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4.8”

Context: E6058517

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 76Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356452
Northing
5796933
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058518

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 77Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356452
Northing
5796933
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.04 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: E6058518

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 78Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 50.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
50.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356452
Northing
5796933
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 50.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“50.1”

Context: E6058518

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 79Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356452
Northing
5796933
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 4.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: E6058518

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 80Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
6.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356452
Northing
5796933
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 6.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“6.1”

Context: E6058518

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 81Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356451
Northing
5796931
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058519

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 82Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356451
Northing
5796931
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.05 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: E6058519

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 83Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 55.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
55.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356451
Northing
5796931
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 55.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“55.3”

Context: E6058519

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 84Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
8.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356451
Northing
5796931
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 8.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“8.6”

Context: E6058519

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 85Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356451
Northing
5796931
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 4.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4.7”

Context: E6058519

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 86Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356682
Northing
5796954
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058520

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 87Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356682
Northing
5796954
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 3.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: E6058520

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 88Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356682
Northing
5796954
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 3.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.1”

Context: E6058520

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 89Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356682
Northing
5796954
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: E6058520

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 90Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356804
Northing
5797141
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058521

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 91Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
6.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356804
Northing
5797141
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 6.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“6.9”

Context: E6058521

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 92Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
8.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356804
Northing
5797141
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 8.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“8.6”

Context: E6058521

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 93Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 15.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
15.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356804
Northing
5797141
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 15.4 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“15.4”

Context: E6058521

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 94Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356802
Northing
5797124
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058522

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 95Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356802
Northing
5797124
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058522

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 96Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356802
Northing
5797124
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: E6058522

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 97Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 31.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
31.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356802
Northing
5797124
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 31.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“31.3”

Context: E6058522

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 98Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 17.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
17.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356802
Northing
5797124
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 17.5 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“17.5”

Context: E6058522

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 99Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356792
Northing
5797121
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058523

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 100Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356792
Northing
5797121
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: E6058523

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 101Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356792
Northing
5797121
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: E6058523

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 102Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356792
Northing
5797121
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 2.4 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: E6058523

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 103Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356741
Northing
5797070
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058524

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 104Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
9.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356741
Northing
5797070
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 9.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“9.7”

Context: E6058524

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 105Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356741
Northing
5797070
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: E6058524

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 106Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356741
Northing
5797070
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 1.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: E6058524

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 107Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356778
Northing
5797045
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058525

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 108Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356778
Northing
5797045
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058525

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 109Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 17.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
17.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356778
Northing
5797045
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 17.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“17.3”

Context: E6058525

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 110Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 17Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
17
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356778
Northing
5797045
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 17 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“17”

Context: E6058525

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 111Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356778
Northing
5797045
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 2.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.6”

Context: E6058525

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 112Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356690
Northing
5797260
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.6”

Context: E6058526

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 113Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356690
Northing
5797260
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: E6058526

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 114Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356690
Northing
5797260
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 1.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: E6058526

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 115Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356630
Northing
5797315
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058527

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 116Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356630
Northing
5797315
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 1.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: E6058527

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 117Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
5.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356630
Northing
5797315
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 5.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“5.1”

Context: E6058527

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 118Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
7.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356630
Northing
5797315
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 7.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“7.2”

Context: E6058527

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 119Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356622
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058528

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 120Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356622
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.68 g/t is very low and not economically significant, despite being described as anomalous in the release.

Positive factors

  • anomalous silver result

Negative factors

  • very low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: E6058528

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 121Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 1500Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1500
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356622
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 1500 ppm (0.15%) is very low and below economic thresholds, despite being described as highly anomalous in the release.

Positive factors

  • anomalous copper result

Negative factors

  • very low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1,500”

Context: E6058528

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 122Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356622
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 3.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: E6058528

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 123Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 8.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
8.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356622
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 8.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“8.1”

Context: E6058528

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 124Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356619
Northing
5797334
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058529

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 125Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356619
Northing
5797334
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058529

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 126Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 43.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
43.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356619
Northing
5797334
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 43.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“43.8”

Context: E6058529

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 127Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356619
Northing
5797334
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 5.4 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“5.4”

Context: E6058529

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 128Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 42.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
42.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356619
Northing
5797334
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 42.8 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“42.8”

Context: E6058529

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 129Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356625
Northing
5797358
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058530

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 130Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356625
Northing
5797358
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: E6058530

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 131Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
7.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356625
Northing
5797358
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 7.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“7.6”

Context: E6058530

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 132Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
6.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356625
Northing
5797358
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 6.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“6.1”

Context: E6058530

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 133Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356623
Northing
5797346
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058531

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 134Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356623
Northing
5797346
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.1 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: E6058531

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 135Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 63.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
63.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356623
Northing
5797346
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 63.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“63.9”

Context: E6058531

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 136Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356623
Northing
5797346
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 4.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4.7”

Context: E6058531

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 137Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 19.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
19.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356623
Northing
5797346
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 19.7 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“19.7”

Context: E6058531

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 138Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356633
Northing
5797357
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058532

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 139Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356633
Northing
5797357
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.07 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: E6058532

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 140Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 68.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
68.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356633
Northing
5797357
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 68.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“68.1”

Context: E6058532

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 141Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
9.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356633
Northing
5797357
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 9.4 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“9.4”

Context: E6058532

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 142Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356633
Northing
5797357
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 4.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4.9”

Context: E6058532

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 143Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 71.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
71.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356658
Northing
5797401
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 71.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“71.8”

Context: E6058533

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 144Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 86.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
86.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356658
Northing
5797401
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 86.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“86.7”

Context: E6058533

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 145Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
5.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356658
Northing
5797401
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 5.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“5.2”

Context: E6058533

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 146Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
9.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356582
Northing
5797343
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 9.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“9.5”

Context: E6058534

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 147Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 47.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
47.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356582
Northing
5797343
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 47.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“47.6”

Context: E6058534

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 148Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 16.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
16.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356582
Northing
5797343
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 16.4 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“16.4”

Context: E6058534

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 149Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356651
Northing
5797324
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058535

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 150Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356651
Northing
5797324
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: E6058535

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 151Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356651
Northing
5797324
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 1.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.2”

Context: E6058535

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 152Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356651
Northing
5797324
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 1.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: E6058535

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 153Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356686
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 4.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: E6058536

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 154Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 49.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
49.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356686
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 49.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“49.5”

Context: E6058536

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 155Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 19.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
19.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356686
Northing
5797337
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 19.2 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“19.2”

Context: E6058536

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 156Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356740
Northing
5797375
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058537

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 157Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356740
Northing
5797375
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 3.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.6”

Context: E6058537

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 158Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 19.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
19.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356740
Northing
5797375
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 19.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“19.1”

Context: E6058537

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 159Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 27.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
27.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
356740
Northing
5797375
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 27.2 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“27.2”

Context: E6058537

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 160Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346509
Northing
5792569
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058538

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 161Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 14.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
14.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346509
Northing
5792569
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 14.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“14.2”

Context: E6058538

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 162Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346509
Northing
5792569
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: E6058538

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 163Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346509
Northing
5792569
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: E6058538

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 164Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
8.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346552
Northing
5792625
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 8.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“8.6”

Context: E6058539

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 165Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346552
Northing
5792625
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“9”

Context: E6058539

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 166Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346552
Northing
5792625
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 1.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: E6058539

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 167Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346534
Northing
5792687
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058540

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 168Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346534
Northing
5792687
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: E6058540

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 169Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346534
Northing
5792687
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 3.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: E6058540

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 170Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346534
Northing
5792687
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: E6058540

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 171Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346533
Northing
5792950
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058541

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 172Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346533
Northing
5792950
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058541

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 173Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 12Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346533
Northing
5792950
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 12 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“12”

Context: E6058541

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 174Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 45.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
45.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346533
Northing
5792950
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 45.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“45.3”

Context: E6058541

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 175Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 17.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
17.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346533
Northing
5792950
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 17.4 ppm is very low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • very low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“17.4”

Context: E6058541

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 176Golden Giant East · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346562
Northing
5792971
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported gold grade of 0.01 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for gold
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: E6058542

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 177Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346562
Northing
5792971
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.02 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: E6058542

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 178Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 33.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
33.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346562
Northing
5792971
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 33.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“33.5”

Context: E6058542

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 179Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 18.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
18.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346562
Northing
5792971
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 18.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“18.5”

Context: E6058542

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 180Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346562
Northing
5792971
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“5”

Context: E6058542

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 181Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
5.2
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346639
Northing
5793014
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 5.2 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“5.2”

Context: E6058543

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 182Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.9
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346639
Northing
5793014
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.9 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: E6058543

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 183Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346639
Northing
5793014
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.4 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: E6058543

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 184Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346528
Northing
5793008
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 3.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.1”

Context: E6058544

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 185Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346528
Northing
5793008
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 1.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: E6058544

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 186Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346528
Northing
5793008
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.5 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: E6058544

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 187Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346477
Northing
5792976
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 3.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“3.8”

Context: E6058545

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 188Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346477
Northing
5792976
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 2.8 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.8”

Context: E6058545

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 189Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 35.1Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
35.1
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346294
Northing
5792554
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 35.1 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“35.1”

Context: E6058546

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 190Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346294
Northing
5792554
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.7”

Context: E6058546

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 191Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
346294
Northing
5792554
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: E6058546

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 192Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345877
Northing
5792205
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 2.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.6”

Context: E6058547

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 193Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345877
Northing
5792205
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 2.3 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: E6058547

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 194Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345877
Northing
5792205
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: E6058547

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 195Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5792198
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported silver grade of 0.32 g/t is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: E6058548

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 196Golden Giant East · copperGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5792198
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported copper grade of 4 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for copper
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: E6058548

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 197Golden Giant East · zincGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
4.6
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5792198
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported zinc grade of 4.6 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for zinc
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: E6058548

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 198Golden Giant East · lithiumGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
ppm

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5792198
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The reported lithium grade of 0.7 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant, even for a grab sample.

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for lithium
  • grab sample not representative

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: E6058548

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

Fact 199Golden Giant East · silverGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Giant East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
QCX

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
345651
Northing
5792187
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
low_confidence
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-01-23T00:00:00.000Z

Negative factors

  • extremely low grade for silver

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Golden Giant Project is located in the James Bay region, only 2.9 km from Azimut Exploration Inc.'s Patwon discovery"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.