QGold Resources Announces Maiden Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Quartz Mountain Gold Project, Positioning the Company as a Premier Gold Development Asset in the United States

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Q-Gold Resources Ltd.
Ticker
QGR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Oregon, USA
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Resource update, Economic study
Extracted
2026-09-16 18:47:20 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

QGold Resources announced a maiden Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for its Quartz Mountain Gold Project in Oregon, USA, revealing strong economics with an after-tax NPV(5%) of US$1.71 billion and an IRR of 55.2% at a gold price of US$3,265/oz. The study projects a 14-year mine life, average annual gold production of 135,400 oz, and a low All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) of US$1,216/oz. The PEA is supported by an updated NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource Estimate, which includes 2.01 million ounces of gold in the Indicated category.

Reasoning: The maiden PEA for the Quartz Mountain Gold Project demonstrates robust economics with a high after-tax IRR of 55.2% and a fast payback of 1.8 years at a conservative gold price, supported by a low AISC and strip ratio. The updated NI 43-101 compliant MRE provides a solid foundation with over 2 million ounces of gold in the indicated category, positioning the company as a promising development asset, despite the preliminary nature of the study and reliance on some inferred resources.

Positive factors

  • High after-tax IRR of 55.2% and fast payback of 1.8 years for the base case PEA.
  • Significant economic upside demonstrated by the spot price case (92% IRR, 1.2-year payback).
  • Low All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) of US$1,216/oz positions the project competitively.
  • Maiden Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) marks a significant milestone for the project.
  • Updated NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource Estimate with 2.01 Moz gold in the Indicated category.
  • Project located in a stable jurisdiction (Oregon, USA) with constructive community relations.
  • Low strip ratio of 0.65:1 contributes to low mining costs and capital efficiency.

Negative factors

  • The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources (23% of mine plan).
  • The TSF type for sulphide material is not specified beyond 'engineered tailings management facility'.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 29

Classification and evidence

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 28. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (28)

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 27963000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 657Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:61eb6163088f4e3926da
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
27963000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
657
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated oxide gold resource provides a solid foundation for the project, contributing significantly to the overall resource base.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated gold resource in the oxide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 27,963

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 27963000Grade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 884Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:61eb6163088f4e3926da
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
27963000
Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
884
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated oxide silver resource adds to the overall project value as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Indicated silver resource in the oxide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 27,963

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3978000Grade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 79Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:696d5a31dd1d9d0b4379
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3978000
Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
79
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred oxide gold resource adds potential but requires further work to upgrade confidence for economic studies.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 3,978

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 3978000Grade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 80Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:696d5a31dd1d9d0b4379
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3978000
Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
80
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred oxide silver resource provides additional potential but requires further work to increase confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 3,978

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 51825000Grade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1353Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:1c6b20debfb1e995fdcc
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
51825000
Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1353
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated sulphide gold resource is a substantial component of the overall resource, providing long-term potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated gold resource in the sulphide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 51,825

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 51825000Grade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2015Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:1c6b20debfb1e995fdcc
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
51825000
Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2015
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated sulphide silver resource contributes to the overall project economics as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Indicated silver resource in the sulphide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: 51,825

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 21657000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 416Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:2bb827063fd30f93ae8d
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
21657000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
416
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred sulphide gold resource provides additional potential but requires further work to upgrade confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: 21,657

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 21657000Grade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 464Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:2bb827063fd30f93ae8d
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
21657000
Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
464
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred sulphide silver resource provides additional potential but requires further work to increase confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 21,657

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 79788000Grade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2010Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:e405814ef114b5b48efd
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Total

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
79788000
Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2010
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The substantial total indicated gold resource provides a strong foundation for the project's economic viability.

Positive factors

  • Large total indicated gold resource of 2.01 million ounces.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 79,788

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Total

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 79788000Grade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2900Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:e405814ef114b5b48efd
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Total

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
79788000
Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2900
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The substantial total indicated silver resource enhances the overall project value as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Large total indicated silver resource.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: 79,788

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Total

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 25634000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 494Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:0dcca9f5ba09d7acccd3
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Total

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
25634000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
494
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total inferred gold resource adds potential but represents a less confident portion of the resource base, requiring further exploration.

Negative factors

  • Significant inferred resource component, which has lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 25,634

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Total

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 25634000Grade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 543Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:0dcca9f5ba09d7acccd3
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
Total

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
25634000
Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
543
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total inferred silver resource adds potential but represents a less confident portion of the resource base, requiring further exploration.

Negative factors

  • Significant inferred resource component, which has lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: 25,634

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Total

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 18405000Grade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 423Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:9ec1e1fb108f7a95e76e
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
18405000
Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
423
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated oxide gold resource at Crone Hill contributes substantially to the project's overall resource base.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated gold resource in the Crone Hill oxide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 18,405

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 18405000Grade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 644Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:9ec1e1fb108f7a95e76e
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
18405000
Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
644
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated oxide silver resource at Crone Hill adds to the overall project value as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Indicated silver resource in the Crone Hill oxide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 18,405

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3170000Grade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 63Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:397363f939b1cafee176
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3170000
Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
63
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred oxide gold resource at Crone Hill provides additional potential but requires further work to upgrade confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 3,170

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 3170000Grade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 63Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:397363f939b1cafee176
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3170000
Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
63
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred oxide silver resource at Crone Hill provides additional potential but requires further work to increase confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 3,170

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 41117000Grade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1090Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:ecdc1c62b888f04367aa
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
41117000
Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1090
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated sulphide gold resource at Crone Hill is a substantial component of the overall resource, providing long-term potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated gold resource in the Crone Hill sulphide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 41,117

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 41117000Grade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1740Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:ecdc1c62b888f04367aa
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
41117000
Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1740
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated sulphide silver resource at Crone Hill adds to the overall project value as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Indicated silver resource in the Crone Hill sulphide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 41,117

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 16102000Grade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 302Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:c9928662f976823ca81e
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16102000
Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
302
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred sulphide gold resource at Crone Hill provides additional potential but requires further work to upgrade confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 16,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 16102000Grade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 334Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:c9928662f976823ca81e
Deposit or zone
CRONE HILL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16102000
Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
334
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred sulphide silver resource at Crone Hill provides additional potential but requires further work to increase confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 16,102

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 9559000Grade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 234Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:2ebd2f5d77857e2a5498
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9559000
Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
234
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated oxide gold resource at Quartz Butte contributes to the project's overall resource base.

Positive factors

  • Indicated gold resource in the Quartz Butte oxide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 9,559

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 9559000Grade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 241Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:2ebd2f5d77857e2a5498
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9559000
Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
241
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated oxide silver resource at Quartz Butte adds to the overall project value as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Indicated silver resource in the Quartz Butte oxide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 9,559

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 807000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 16Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:320248555fbffdcf9bfb
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
807000
Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
16
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred oxide gold resource at Quartz Butte provides additional potential but requires further work to upgrade confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 807

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 807000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 16Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:320248555fbffdcf9bfb
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
807000
Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
16
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred oxide silver resource at Quartz Butte provides additional potential but requires further work to increase confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 807

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Oxide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 10708000Grade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 263Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:9406055b1a731338939e
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10708000
Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
263
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated sulphide gold resource at Quartz Butte contributes to the project's overall resource base.

Positive factors

  • Indicated gold resource in the Quartz Butte sulphide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 10,708

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 10708000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 275Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:9406055b1a731338939e
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10708000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
275
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The indicated sulphide silver resource at Quartz Butte adds to the overall project value as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Indicated silver resource in the Quartz Butte sulphide material.
  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.8”

Context: 10,708

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Indicated, indicating a reasonable level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”
inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · goldTonnes: 5555000Grade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 113Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:af730ddf01f1d732e409
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5555000
Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
113
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred sulphide gold resource at Quartz Butte provides additional potential but requires further work to upgrade confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 5,555

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredQuartz Mountain Gold Project · silverTonnes: 5555000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 130Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Quartz Mountain Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
oregon, usa
Reported Region
Oregon, USA
Ticker
QGR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Fred Brown
Resource group id
resource:af730ddf01f1d732e409
Deposit or zone
QUARTZ BUTTE
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
sulphide

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5555000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
130
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-28

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The inferred sulphide silver resource at Quartz Butte provides additional potential but requires further work to increase confidence.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources have lower reliability and cannot be converted to reserves without further drilling.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 5,555

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Sulphide

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Byproduct CommodityRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Reason: Silver is mentioned as a contribution to gold equivalent production, indicating it is a byproduct.

Evidence · text

“Considering the silver contribution the gold equivalent production will be an average life-of-mine production of 137,200 ounces per year.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.