# Resouro Strategic Metals Inc. \(RSGOF\) PEA milestone for Tiros Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-pea-milestone-for-tiros-project--f50e510d-bcc3-4689-9b49-b0729b1c4675

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RSM/news/5479877972402057/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-pea-milestone-for-tiros-project

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-06-15T00:32:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Resouro Strategic Metals Inc.

- Ticker: RSM

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil

- Primary commodity: Titanium

- Secondary commodities: Rare earths

- Document categories: Economic study, Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 18:32:01 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Resouro Strategic Metals Inc. has completed a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for its Tiros Project in Brazil, projecting an after-tax NPV of US$714.9 million and an IRR of 44.2%. The starter operation targets a high-grade 9.5Mt ROM feed with 26.3% TiO2 and 10,832 ppm TREO using an open-pit mining method.

Reasoning: The completion of a PEA for the Tiros project demonstrates robust economics with high IRR and NPV, though it relies on Inferred resources for the starter operation.

- Positive factor: Strong NPV of US$714.9 million

- Positive factor: High IRR of 44.2%

- Positive factor: High-grade starter operation \(26.3% TiO2\)

- Positive factor: Large existing M&amp;I resource base \(1.4 billion tonnes\)

- Positive factor: Favourable jurisdiction \(Minas Gerais, Brazil\)

- Negative factor: Economics based on Inferred resources

- Negative factor: Titanium recovery is relatively low at 68.7%

- Negative factor: Rare earth recovery is 67%

Facts used in scoring: 4

## Classification and evidence

**PEA Only**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Only Class 4 / Initial Assessment economics available. Not bankable.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states it is a Preliminary Economic Assessment and not a feasibility study.

Evidence · text

> The PEA is preliminary in nature.

**Inferred Heavy Feed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Material Inferred share of LOM mill feed, or the share is undisclosed.

Why it applies: The starter operation contemplates processing high-grade material that is part of the broader resource, but the PEA includes Inferred Mineral Resources.

Evidence · text

> It includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them

**High IRR**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Post-tax real unlevered IRR in the strong tier or better.

Why it applies: The reported after-tax IRR of 44.2% is in the exceptional tier.

Evidence · text

> after-tax internal rate of return \(IRR\) of 44.2%

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PEA was prepared according to NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

> prepared by a team led by Norda Stelo according to National Instrument 43-101 Standards

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-pea-milestone-for-tiros-project--f50e510d-bcc3-4689-9b49-b0729b1c4675#fact-resource-facts-2)

Tiros · titanium

#### Identity

- Project: Tiros
- Commodity: titanium
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker: RSM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- Resource group id: resource:11b215dd75763d9833dd
- Deposit or zone: Tiros
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Material type: null
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1400000000
- Grade: 12
- Grade Unit: %

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Existing large M&amp;I resource mentioned as context.

- Positive factor: Large scale resource

Evidence · text

> 1.4 billion tonne Measured and Indicated Resource - Significant expansion potential supported by a very large titanium and rare earth mineral resource

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-pea-milestone-for-tiros-project--f50e510d-bcc3-4689-9b49-b0729b1c4675#fact-resource-facts-3)

Tiros · rare\_earths

#### Identity

- Project: Tiros
- Commodity: rare\_earths
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker: RSM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- Resource group id: resource:449582874f407e9886fd
- Deposit or zone: Tiros
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1400000000
- Grade: 4000
- Grade Unit: ppm

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Existing large M&amp;I resource mentioned as context.

Evidence · text

> 1.4 billion tonne Measured and Indicated Resource ... and 4,000 ppm of total rare earth oxides

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
