# Resouro Strategic Metals Inc. \(RSGOF\) Presentation: Delivering Robust PEA for Tiros Titanium and Rare Earth Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-presentation-delivering-robust-pea-for-tiros--1f30e9db-2c00-4611-81e4-68b58e03b9ea

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RSM/news/7648001238103078/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-presentation-delivering-robust-pea-for-tiros-

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-06-17T01:12:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Resouro Strategic Metals Inc.

- Ticker: RSM

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil

- Primary commodity: Titanium

- Secondary commodities: Rare earth

- Document categories: Resource update, Economic study

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 18:32:33 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Resouro Strategic Metals Inc. has released a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for the Tiros Titanium and Rare Earth Project in Brazil. The PEA outlines a 500,000 tpa starter operation with a post-tax NPV of US$714.9 million and an IRR of 44.2%, supported by a 1.4 billion tonne M&amp;I resource.

Reasoning: The PEA presents a highly robust economic case for a starter operation with exceptional IRR and payback, supported by a massive M&amp;I resource.

- Positive factor: Strong post-tax IRR of 44.2%

- Positive factor: Fast payback of 1.9 years

- Positive factor: Large Measured and Indicated resource base \(1.4 Bt\)

- Positive factor: Low upfront capital intensity for starter operation

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: The PEA is intended to lead to a Pre-Feasibility Study.

Evidence · text

> progression to a Pre-Feasibility Study

**High IRR**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Post-tax real unlevered IRR in the strong tier or better.

Why it applies: Post-tax IRR of 44.2% is in the strong tier.

Evidence · text

> Post-tax IRR: 44.2%

**Fast Payback**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Payback in the strong tier or better, on the required basis.

Why it applies: Payback of 1.9 years is in the strong tier.

Evidence · text

> Post-tax payback period: 1.9 years

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource includes a significant Indicated component within the M&amp;I category.

Evidence · text

> 1.4 billion tonne Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-presentation-delivering-robust-pea-for-tiros--1f30e9db-2c00-4611-81e4-68b58e03b9ea#fact-resource-facts-1)

Tiros Titanium and Rare Earth Project · titanium

#### Identity

- Project: Tiros Titanium and Rare Earth Project
- Commodity: titanium
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker: RSM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2025-04-09T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id: resource:5941a0adb85c5607db09
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1400000000
- Grade: 12
- Grade Unit: % TiO2
- Contained Metal: 165000000
- Contained Unit: t tio2

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-04-09

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Massive M&amp;I resource base.

- Positive factor: Globally significant scale

Evidence · text

> 1.4 Bt @ 12% TiO2 and 4,000 ppm TREO in the Measured and Indicated category

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-presentation-delivering-robust-pea-for-tiros--1f30e9db-2c00-4611-81e4-68b58e03b9ea#fact-resource-facts-2)

Tiros Titanium and Rare Earth Project · rare earth

#### Identity

- Project: Tiros Titanium and Rare Earth Project
- Commodity: rare earth
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker: RSM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2025-04-09T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id: resource:5941a0adb85c5607db09
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1400000000
- Grade: 4000
- Grade Unit: ppm TREO
- Contained Metal: 5500000
- Contained Unit: t treo

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-04-09

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant TREO content within the main resource.

- Positive factor: Significant byproduct potential

Evidence · text

> 1.4 Bt @ 12% TiO2 and 4,000 ppm TREO

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
