# Resouro Strategic Metals Inc. \(RSGOF\) Selects Flowsheet for Tiros PEA

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-selects-flowsheet-for-tiros-pea--9cde0b2a-b24a-4fee-8c5c-7e5d45dcd378

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RSM/news/5198220861319847/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-selects-flowsheet-for-tiros-pea

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-11-26T23:03:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Resouro Strategic Metals Inc.

- Ticker: RSM

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil

- Primary commodity: Titanium

- Secondary commodities: Rare earth

- Document categories: Resource update, Economic study, Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 18:57:17 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Resouro Strategic Metals Inc. has selected a process flowsheet for its Tiros Titanium and Rare Earths Project in Brazil, following 18 months of metallurgical testing. The flowsheet utilizes conventional technologies to produce titanium dioxide and mixed rare earth products, paving the way for a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\).

Reasoning: The company has reached a key milestone by selecting a flowsheet for the Tiros PEA, supported by 18 months of metallurgical testing. While specific recoveries and costs are not yet disclosed, the selection of conventional technologies reduces technical risk.

- Positive factor: Flowsheet selection completed for upcoming PEA

- Positive factor: Extensive 18-month metallurgical test-work completed

- Positive factor: Use of conventional technologies and local equipment sourcing

- Positive factor: Resource estimate details provided

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**PEA Only**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Only Class 4 / Initial Assessment economics available. Not bankable.

Why it applies: The document announces the selection of a flowsheet for an upcoming Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\).

Evidence · text

> path toward completing a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\)

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: The flowsheet involves hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical processes including calcination, acid baking, and leaching.

Evidence · text

> calcination / acid baking / leach process

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The document mentions the upcoming report will be according to NI 43-101 standards and names technical experts.

Evidence · text

> report recoveries, mass balances, and product specifications according to NI 43-101 standards

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-selects-flowsheet-for-tiros-pea--9cde0b2a-b24a-4fee-8c5c-7e5d45dcd378#fact-resource-facts-1)

Tiros Titanium and Rare Earths Project · titanium

#### Identity

- Project: Tiros Titanium and Rare Earths Project
- Commodity: titanium
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker: RSM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- Resource group id: resource:dea514cd60e73cd25881

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1400000000
- Grade: 12
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 165000000
- Contained Unit: mt

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of existing resource data provided in the text.

Evidence · text

> 1.4 billion tonne at 12% titanium dioxide

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/resouro-strategic-metals-inc-rsgof-selects-flowsheet-for-tiros-pea--9cde0b2a-b24a-4fee-8c5c-7e5d45dcd378#fact-resource-facts-2)

Tiros Titanium and Rare Earths Project · rare earth

#### Identity

- Project: Tiros Titanium and Rare Earths Project
- Commodity: rare earth
- Region: brazil
- Reported Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker: RSM

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- Resource group id: resource:dea514cd60e73cd25881

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1400000000
- Grade: 4000
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Contained Metal: 5600000
- Contained Unit: t

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of existing resource data provided in the text.

Evidence · text

> 4,000 ppm of total rare earth oxides

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
