# Revival Gold 2025 Year in Review

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-2025-year-in-review--021f7d72-fa1c-43d0-b38a-68911554ebe5

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RVG/news/5363479016621835/revival-gold-2025-year-in-review

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-12-30T12:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Revival Gold Inc.

- Ticker: RVG

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: western United States

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-12 23:05:44 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Revival Gold provided a 2025 year-in-review, highlighting successful C$34 million equity financing and strategic investments from Dundee Corporation and EMR Capital. The company also reported key Mercur PEA economics and several high-grade drill intercepts from its Mercur project.

Reasoning: The document is a year-in-review summary. While it re-highlights drill results and PEA economics, it provides a positive overview of corporate milestones, financing, and project advancement.

- Positive factor: strong drill intercepts at Mercur

- Positive factor: strategic investments from Dundee and EMR Capital

- Positive factor: successful equity financing of C$34 million

- Positive factor: compelling Mercur PEA economics

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: Technical information was reviewed and approved by two Qualified Persons \(John Meyer and Dan Pace\).

Evidence · text

> Qualified Persons Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP... and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (3)

### RMC25-011

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-2025-year-in-review--021f7d72-fa1c-43d0-b38a-68911554ebe5#fact-drill-facts-0)

Mercur · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-011
- Project: Mercur
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa
- Reported Region: usa
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 21.1 m
- From: 75.8 m
- To: 96.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 75.8 m

#### Classification

- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RMC25-011:75.8-96.9

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 3.0 g/T over 21.1m is a solid intercept for an orogenic/Carlin-style system.

- Positive factor: strong grade and width

Evidence · text

> 3.0 g/T gold over 21.1 meters from 75.8 meters in RMC25-011

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

### RM25-099

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-2025-year-in-review--021f7d72-fa1c-43d0-b38a-68911554ebe5#fact-drill-facts-1)

Mercur · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-099
- Project: Mercur
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa
- Reported Region: usa
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.78
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 70.1 m
- From: 59.4 m
- To: 129.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 59.4 m

#### Classification

- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RM25-099:59.4-129.5

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wide intercept of 70.1m provides continuity, though grade is lower.

- Positive factor: significant width

Evidence · text

> 0.78 g/T over 70.1 meters from 59.4 meters in RM25-099

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

### RM25-117

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-2025-year-in-review--021f7d72-fa1c-43d0-b38a-68911554ebe5#fact-drill-facts-2)

Mercur · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-117
- Project: Mercur
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa
- Reported Region: usa
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 44.2 m
- From: 33.5 m
- To: 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth: 33.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RM25-117:33.5-77.7

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 1.4 g/T over 44.2m is a strong intercept for the project.

- Positive factor: good grade and width

Evidence · text

> 1.4 g/T gold over 44.2 meters from 33.5 meters in RM25-117

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
