Revival Gold Intercepts 1.8 g/t Gold Over 26 Meters and Provides Update on Mercur Heap Leach Project in Utah
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Utah
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Permitting, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-09-12 23:06:50 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold announced new drill results from its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, including 1.8 g/t gold over 25.9 meters. The company also provided an update on project development, detailing progress on baseline environmental studies, archaeological mitigation planning, and the commencement of a column leach test program. These activities are in support of a planned 2026 pre-feasibility study aimed at restarting gold production at Mercur.
Reasoning: New drill results confirm expected mineralization tenor and leachability, supporting the planned pre-feasibility study. Progress on permitting and metallurgical testwork indicates advancement towards restarting gold production, though individual intercept grades are not exceptional.
Positive factors
- Drill results confirm near-surface oxide gold mineralization consistent with prior estimates.
- Progress on permitting activities, including baseline studies and archaeological mitigation planning, de-risks project development.
- Metallurgical testwork program (column leach tests) is underway to support the PFS.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified laboratory and QP sign-off.
- Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for intercepts are clearly stated.
Negative factors
- The highest reported grade (1.8 g/t Au) is moderate compared to the company's prior best intercept and peer averages for orogenic gold deposits.
- True width is estimated as a range (70-100% of drilled width) rather than a precise value for each intercept.
- Metallurgical testwork is planned and underway, but no new results are reported in this release.
Facts used in scoring: 24
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a detailed 'QA/QC Program' section mentioning certified reference materials, duplicate samples, blanks, and an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab (ALS Minerals).
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream. Sample results are analyzed immediately upon receipt, and all discrepancies are investigated. Samples are submitted to the ALS Geochemistry sample preparation facility in Elko, Nevada. Gold analyses are performed at the ALS Geochemistry laboratory in Reno, Nevada or Vancouver, British Columbia, and multi-element geochemical analyses are completed at the ALS Minerals laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Technical information in the news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP.
Evidence · text
“Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: Footnote 2 explicitly states that 'Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.'
Evidence · text
“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Footnote 1 states that 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling program 'targeted the western edge of the PEA design pit' and aims to 'support the Company's planned 2026 pre-feasibility study,' which implies a focus on resource definition and infill.
Evidence · text
“RM25-136 and RM25-137 in the Marion Hill area at Main Mercur, targeted the western edge of the PEA design pit. The holes are encouraging with long runs of mineralization that continue to the bottom of the holes and outside the current PEA pit shells. ... Data collected will support the Company's planned 2026 pre-feasibility study”
PEA-Supportingneutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: The drilling results are stated to be 'consistent with the Inferred Mineral Resource and metallurgical models developed for the Mercur Preliminary Economic Assessment ('PEA')' and will support a planned pre-feasibility study.
Evidence · text
“Drilling results collected to-date at Mercur are generally consistent with the Inferred Mineral Resource and metallurgical models developed for the Mercur Preliminary Economic Assessment ('PEA') (see 'Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Mercur Gold Project, Tooele & Utah Counties, Utah, USA' prepared by Kappes, Cassidy & Associates, and RESPEC Company LLC dated May 2nd, 2025).”
Heap Leach Routeneutral
Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.
Why it applies: the document describes a heap_leach route ("heap leach")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (24)
RM25-111Mercur · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-111
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.5 m
- From
- 56.4 m
- To
- 86.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 56.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-111:56.4-86.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of moderate grade, consistent with the overall project profile.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 30.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-111Mercur · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-111
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 126.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 56.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-111:120.4-126.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of moderate grade and narrow width, consistent with the overall project profile.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-121Mercur · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-121
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.3 m
- From
- 102.1 m
- To
- 123.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 102.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-121:102.1-123.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Mercur Hill
- Azimuth
- 325 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of low grade, consistent with the overall project profile.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Mercur Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is well below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-124Mercur · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-124
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 42.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-124:24.4-42.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- 50 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of moderate grade, consistent with the overall project profile.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 18.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-128Mercur · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-128
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-128:0-7.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade, near-surface gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms near-surface gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-128Mercur · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-128
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.4 m
- From
- 57.9 m
- To
- 82.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-128:57.9-82.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 24.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-130Mercur · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-130
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 68.6 m
- To
- 71.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-130:68.6-71.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 200 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade, narrow gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade, and the intercept is narrow.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-131Mercur · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-131
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-131:21.3-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 310 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization with good width, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area with good width.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 29.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-135Mercur · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-135
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 269.7 m
- To
- 281.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 269.7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-135:269.7-281.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Mercur Hill
- Azimuth
- 285 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of moderate grade, consistent with the overall project profile.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Mercur Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-136Mercur · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-136
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 42.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-136:25.9-42.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 16.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-136Mercur · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-136
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36.6 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 85.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-136:48.8-85.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization with good width, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area with good width.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 36.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-137Mercur · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-137
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-137:33.5-48.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of moderate grade, consistent with the overall project profile.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 15.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-137Mercur · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-137
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-137:53.3-67.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 13.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-139Mercur · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-139
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 30.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-139:22.9-30.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 130 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade, narrow gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade, and the intercept is narrow.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-139Mercur · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-139
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.3 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-139:39.6-61
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 130 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-140Mercur · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-140
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47.2 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-140:47.2-65.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 18.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-141Mercur · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-141
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-141:24.4-35.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 200 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 10.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-141Mercur · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-141
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24.4 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-141:51.8-61
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 200 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade, narrow gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade, and the intercept is narrow.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-142Mercur · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-142
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 38.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-142:18.3-38.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 19.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-144Mercur · goldGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-144
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.9 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-144:6.1-32
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 190 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is a highlight, confirming good grade and width near surface, supporting the open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms near-surface gold mineralization with good grade and width.
- Grade is consistent with the project average.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: 25.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-145Mercur · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-145
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-145:22.9-32
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade, narrow gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade, and the intercept is narrow.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-147Mercur · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-147
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 39.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-147:30.5-39.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 130 °
- Dip
- 55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of moderate grade and narrow width, consistent with the overall project profile.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms gold mineralization in the Rover area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RMC25-019Mercur · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-019
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 16.8 m
- To
- 38.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-019:16.8-38.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is a highlight, confirming good width near surface, supporting the open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms near-surface gold mineralization with good width.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is below the project average and peer 25th percentile for orogenic gold.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RMC25-021Mercur · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-021
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.7 m
- From
- 1.2 m
- To
- 13.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-021:1.2-13.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 250 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms low-grade, near-surface gold mineralization, consistent with the project's open-pit heap leach potential.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms near-surface gold mineralization in the Marion Hill area.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified.
Negative factors
- Grade is low, near the cutoff grade.
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 12.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.