Revival Gold Intercepts 4.2 g/t Gold Over 25 Meters at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Revival Gold Inc.
Ticker
RVG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Utah
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-12 23:09:18 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Revival Gold Inc. announced high-grade gold drill results from its 2025 program at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah, including 4.2 g/t gold over 25 meters and 6.5 g/t gold over 7.1 meters. These initial results from the South Mercur area, featuring bonanza grades up to 10.53 g/t gold, significantly exceed prior project averages and highlight strong exploration potential. The data will support a planned Prefeasibility Study for the project, with QA/QC procedures and QP sign-off confirming the reliability of the results.

Reasoning: The drilling program at Mercur Gold Project delivered several high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, significantly exceeding the project's historical average and extending mineralization into the South Mercur area, which will support a Prefeasibility Study.

Positive factors

  • High grades significantly exceeding prior project averages
  • Bonanza intercepts (up to 10.53 g/t gold)
  • Significant widths (up to 32 meters)
  • Step-out extension into the South Mercur area, highlighting exploration potential
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off
  • Results support a planned Prefeasibility Study

Negative factors

  • True width not specifically stated for individual intercepts

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 35

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Several intercepts, including 10.53 g/t Au over 4.0 m, 9.77 g/t Au over 5.7 m, 8.69 g/t Au over 1.1 m, 7.11 g/t Au over 2.9 m, and 6.52 g/t Au over 7.1 m, exceed the exceptional threshold for open-pit gold deposits (5 g/t).

Evidence · text

“9.8 g/T gold over 5.7 meters width at 55 meters downhole”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The release highlights 'Revival Gold's first drill holes completed in the South Mercur area' and 'first reported by Revival Gold for the South Mercur area', indicating new mineralization beyond previously explored zones.

Evidence · text

“Revival Gold's first drill holes completed in the South Mercur area present high-grade intercepts and further highlight the exploration potential at Mercur.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The document includes a dedicated 'QA/QC Program' section detailing the insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks, and mentions ALS Geochemistry as an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The release states that 'Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution'.

Evidence · text

“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-100% of drilled width' but does not provide specific true width measurements for individual intercepts.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-100% of drilled width.”

PFS-Supportingneutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: The drilling data collected 'will support the Company's planned Prefeasibility Study targeting release in Q1 2027'.

Evidence · text

“Data collected will support the Company's planned Prefeasibility Study targeting release in Q1 2027”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 35. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (35)

RM25-138Mercur · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-138
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
25.9 m
To
30.5 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-138:25.9-30.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
305 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade and width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-138Mercur · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-138
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
36.6 m
To
39.6 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-138:36.6-39.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
305 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade and width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-154Mercur · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-154
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
21.3 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-154:21.3-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Rover
Azimuth
110 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade and narrow width, providing minor contribution to the overall resource.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-166Mercur · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-166
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
68.6 m
To
80.8 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-166:68.6-80.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
130 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-164Mercur · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-164
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
21.3 m
To
45.7 m
Intercept Depth
21.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-164:21.3-45.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
100 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing positively to the resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 24.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-168Mercur · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-168
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.8 m
From
74.7 m
To
94.5 m
Intercept Depth
74.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-168:74.7-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
150 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width, providing minor contribution to the overall resource.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 19.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-169Mercur · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-169
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32 m
From
50.3 m
To
82.3 m
Intercept Depth
50.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-169:50.3-82.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
280 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width, contributing positively to the resource potential and aligning with the company's highlights.

Positive factors

  • Significant width (32 meters)

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 32.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-173Mercur · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-173
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
15.2 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
15.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-173:15.2-29
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, providing minor contribution to the overall resource.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-173Mercur · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-173
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
83.8 m
To
86.9 m
Intercept Depth
15.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-173:83.8-86.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-174Mercur · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-174
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
68.6 m
To
79.2 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-174:68.6-79.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-175Mercur · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-175
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
6.1 m
To
13.7 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-175:6.1-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-175Mercur · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-175
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
73.2 m
To
86.9 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-175:73.2-86.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-176Mercur · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-176
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
57.9 m
To
76.2 m
Intercept Depth
57.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-176:57.9-76.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
15 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width, providing minor contribution to the overall resource.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 18.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RM25-177Mercur · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-177
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
48.8 m
To
59.4 m
Intercept Depth
48.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-177:48.8-59.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Marion Hill
Azimuth
320 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-024Mercur · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-024
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.9 m
From
57.9 m
To
83.8 m
Intercept Depth
57.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-024:57.9-83.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 25.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-025Mercur · goldGrade: 6.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-025
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
6.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.1 m
From
35 m
To
42.1 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-025:35-42.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept features bonanza gold grades over a good width, significantly exceeding prior project averages and contributing strongly to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept (6.52 g/t gold)
  • Strong grade compared to project average and peer group

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“6.52”

Context: 7.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-025Mercur · goldGrade: 10.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-025
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
10.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
36.5 m
To
40.4 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-025:36.5-40.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval features exceptional bonanza gold grades, significantly enhancing the overall intercept's value and highlighting high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept (10.53 g/t gold)
  • Exceptional grade compared to project average and peer group

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“10.53”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-025Mercur · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-025
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.1 m
From
46.5 m
To
61.6 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-025:46.5-61.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, contributing positively to the resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 15.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-025Mercur · goldGrade: 8.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-025
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
8.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
57.8 m
To
58.8 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-025:57.8-58.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval features bonanza gold grades, significantly enhancing the overall intercept's value despite its narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept (8.69 g/t gold)
  • Exceptional grade compared to project average and peer group

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width (1.1 meters)

Evidence · table

“8.69”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-025Mercur · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-025
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.8 m
From
99.8 m
To
111.6 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-025:99.8-111.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 11.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-026Mercur · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-026
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
0 m
To
18.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-026:0-18.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing positively to the resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 18.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-026Mercur · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-026
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.7 m
From
33.5 m
To
46.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-026:33.5-46.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mercur Hill
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 12.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-027Mercur · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-027
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.2 m
From
12.2 m
To
25.4 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-027:12.2-25.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sacramento
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, providing minor contribution to the overall resource.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 13.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-027Mercur · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-027
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.2 m
From
28.1 m
To
48.2 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-027:28.1-48.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sacramento
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 20.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-027Mercur · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-027
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.9 m
From
105.9 m
To
112.8 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-027:105.9-112.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sacramento
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, providing minor contribution to the overall resource.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 6.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-028Mercur · goldGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-028
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
4.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.3 m
From
43 m
To
68.28 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-028:43-68.28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
25 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept features strong gold grades over a significant width, representing a key highlight from the new South Mercur area and exceeding prior project averages.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade (4.15 g/t gold)
  • Significant width (25.3 meters)
  • First reported results from South Mercur area

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.15”

Context: 25.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-028Mercur · goldGrade: 9.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-028
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
9.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.7 m
From
54.7 m
To
60.4 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-028:54.7-60.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
25 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval features exceptional bonanza gold grades, significantly enhancing the overall intercept's value and highlighting high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept (9.77 g/t gold)
  • Exceptional grade compared to project average and peer group

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“9.77”

Context: 5.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-028Mercur · goldGrade: 2.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-028
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
2.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
72.2 m
To
72.9 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-028:72.2-72.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
25 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade but over a very narrow width, limiting its overall materiality.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width (0.7 meters)

Evidence · table

“2.95”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-028Mercur · goldGrade: 2.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-028
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
2.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
76.1 m
To
76.8 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-028:76.1-76.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
25 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade but over a very narrow width, limiting its overall materiality.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width (0.7 meters)

Evidence · table

“2.98”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-028Mercur · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-028
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.7 m
From
81.7 m
To
88.39 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-028:81.7-88.39
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
25 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 6.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-028Mercur · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-028
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.4 m
From
92 m
To
99.36 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-028:92-99.36
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
25 °
Dip
75 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 7.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-029Mercur · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-029
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
52.2 m
To
54.86 m
Intercept Depth
52.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-029:52.2-54.86
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
195 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade but over a narrow width, limiting its overall materiality.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width (2.7 meters)

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-029Mercur · goldGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-029
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
2.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.7 m
From
58.5 m
To
68.12 m
Intercept Depth
52.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-029:58.5-68.12
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
195 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, contributing positively to the resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade (2.90 g/t gold)

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.90”

Context: 9.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-029Mercur · goldGrade: 7.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-029
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
7.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.9 m
From
62.8 m
To
65.7 m
Intercept Depth
52.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-029:62.8-65.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
195 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval features bonanza gold grades, significantly enhancing the overall intercept's value despite its narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept (7.11 g/t gold)
  • Exceptional grade compared to project average and peer group

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Narrow width (2.9 meters)

Evidence · table

“7.11”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

RMC25-030Mercur · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-030
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
usa_ut
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.2 m
From
103.3 m
To
124.5 m
Intercept Depth
103.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-030:103.3-124.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
South Mercur
Azimuth
290 °
Dip
70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, contributing positively to the resource potential in the South Mercur area.

Positive factors

  • Good width (21.2 meters)

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: 21.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.