Revival Gold Intersects 3.0 g/t Gold Over 21.1 Meters at Mercur and Mobilizes Fourth Rig to Beartrack-Arnett
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Utah
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 00:06:36 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold announced new drill results from its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, highlighted by 3.02 g/t gold over 21.1 meters. These results, along with other significant intercepts, support the company's planned 2026 pre-feasibility study and ongoing efforts to upgrade Inferred Mineral Resources. Additionally, Revival Gold has mobilized a fourth drill rig to its Beartrack-Arnett Gold Project in Idaho to target new high-grade areas.
Reasoning: Revival Gold reported strong new drill results from its Mercur project, including a high-grade, significant width intercept, which are positive for the upcoming pre-feasibility study and resource upgrade. The mobilization of a fourth rig for exploration at Beartrack-Arnett also indicates continued growth and potential for new discoveries.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts at Mercur
- Significant widths reported
- Drilling supports planned PFS and resource upgrade
- New rig mobilized for exploration at Beartrack-Arnett
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and lab is certified
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not explicitly stated for each intercept
- Some intercepts are low-grade or narrow
Facts used in scoring: 32
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the QA/QC program including insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks, and mentions ALS Geochemistry as an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream. ... ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The technical information in the news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, both Qualified Persons.
Evidence · text
“Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states that true width for all holes is estimated to be 65-100% of drilled width, but does not provide specific true width measurements for each intercept.
Evidence · text
“True width for all holes is estimated to be 65-100% of drilled width.”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade.
Evidence · text
“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The document states that the cutoff grade allows for up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.
Evidence · text
“allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling program at Mercur is focused on upgrading Inferred Mineral Resources, which is characteristic of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“focused on upgrading Inferred Mineral Resources”
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: This year's drilling at Mercur is in support of a planned 2026 pre-feasibility study.
Evidence · text
“This year’s drilling is in support of a planned 2026 pre-feasibility study”
Heap Leach Routeneutral
Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.
Why it applies: The Mercur project is described as a 'shallow open pit heap leach gold project', indicating the intended processing route.
Evidence · text
“Revival Gold’s Mercur – a shallow open pit heap leach gold project”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: At Beartrack-Arnett, Revival Gold is targeting new high-grade areas to expand its resource base.
Evidence · text
“targeting new high-grade areas to expand our already large resource base at the project”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document references and quotes historical drill results from 2021 and 2022 press releases for the Beartrack-Arnett project.
Evidence · text
“See press releases dated December 2nd, 2021, and September 22nd, 2022, for details on past drilling at Joss.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (32)
RMC25-011Mercur · goldGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-011
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.1 m
- From
- 75.8 m
- To
- 96.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 75.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-011:75.8-96.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Golden Gate
- Azimuth
- 320 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows exceptional gold grade over a significant width, resulting in a strong grade-width product, supporting the project's open-pit potential.
Positive factors
- High Grade
- Significant Width
- Strong Grade-Width Product
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.02”
Context: 21.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RMC25-011Mercur · goldGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-011
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 106.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 75.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-011:102-106.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Golden Gate
- Azimuth
- 320 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong Grade
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.95”
Context: 4.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RMC25-011Mercur · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-011
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 141.7 m
- To
- 148.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 75.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-011:141.7-148.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Golden Gate
- Azimuth
- 320 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 6.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RMC25-013Mercur · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-013
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 68.8 m
- To
- 78.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-013:68.8-78.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Mercur Hill
- Azimuth
- 245 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RMC25-013Mercur · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-013
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 104.2 m
- To
- 105.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-013:104.2-105.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Mercur Hill
- Azimuth
- 245 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very low-grade intercept, barely above the stated cutoff.
Negative factors
- Below Weak Grade Threshold
- Narrow Width
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RMC25-013Mercur · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-013
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.8 m
- From
- 108.7 m
- To
- 124.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-013:108.7-124.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Mercur Hill
- Azimuth
- 245 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 15.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-089Mercur · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-089
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35.1 m
- From
- 44.2 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-089:44.2-79.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate grade-width product over a significant width, contributing to the resource.
Positive factors
- Significant Width
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 35.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-089Mercur · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-089
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 105.2 m
- To
- 109.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-089:105.2-109.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very low-grade intercept, barely above the stated cutoff.
Negative factors
- Below Weak Grade Threshold
- Narrow Width
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-093Mercur · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-093
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.1 m
- From
- 41.1 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 41.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-093:41.1-79.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate grade-width product over a significant width, contributing to the resource.
Positive factors
- Significant Width
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 38.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-097Mercur · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-097
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 70.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-097:54.9-70.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 30 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate grade-width product, contributing to the resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 15.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-098Mercur · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-098
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 36.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-098:32-36.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 275 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, resulting in a moderate grade-width product.
Positive factors
- Strong Grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.28”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-098Mercur · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-098
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 57.9 m
- To
- 80.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-098:57.9-80.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 275 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate grade-width product over a significant width, contributing to the resource.
Positive factors
- Significant Width
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 22.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-099Mercur · goldGrade: 3.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-099
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 36.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-099:33.5-36.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 265 °
- Dip
- -85 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a narrow width, resulting in a moderate grade-width product.
Positive factors
- High Grade
Negative factors
- Narrow Width
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.93”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-099Mercur · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-099
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 70.1 m
- From
- 59.4 m
- To
- 129.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-099:59.4-129.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 265 °
- Dip
- -85 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong grade-width product over a very significant width, contributing substantially to the resource.
Positive factors
- Significant Width
- Strong Grade-Width Product
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 70.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-102Mercur · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-102
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 54.9 m
- To
- 68.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-102:54.9-68.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 105 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 13.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-103Mercur · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-103
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-103:53.3-67.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Marion Hill
- Azimuth
- 40 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very low-grade intercept, barely above the stated cutoff.
Negative factors
- Below Weak Grade Threshold
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 13.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-104Mercur · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-104
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-104:1.5-9.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 160 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-104Mercur · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-104
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 41.1 m
- To
- 59.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-104:41.1-59.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 160 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 18.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-105Mercur · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-105
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-105:3-7.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 245 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-105Mercur · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-105
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 44.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-105:24.4-44.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 245 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very low-grade intercept, barely above the stated cutoff.
Negative factors
- Below Weak Grade Threshold
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 19.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-106Mercur · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-106
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 42.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-106:27.4-42.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 15.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-106Mercur · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-106
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 57.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-106:47.2-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 10.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-107Mercur · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-107
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-107:29-45.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 335 °
- Dip
- -65 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept, but still above cutoff and contributes to the overall resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 16.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-108Mercur · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-108
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 7.6 m
- To
- 10.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-108:7.6-10.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a very low-grade intercept, barely above the stated cutoff.
Negative factors
- Below Weak Grade Threshold
- Narrow Width
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-108Mercur · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-108
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35.1 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 62.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-108:27.4-62.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate grade-width product over a significant width, contributing to the resource.
Positive factors
- Significant Width
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 35.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-109Mercur · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-109
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.1 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 68.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-109:30.5-68.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 235 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate grade-width product over a significant width, but with a grade below the weak threshold.
Positive factors
- Significant Width
Negative factors
- Below Weak Grade Threshold
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 38.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM25-109Mercur · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-109
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 74.7 m
- To
- 77.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-109:74.7-77.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 235 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a low-grade intercept over a narrow width, contributing to the resource.
Negative factors
- Low Grade
- Narrow Width
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
BT22-242DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 3.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 115.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT22-242D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 115.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-12-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional historical intercept with a very strong grade-width product, indicating significant mineralization potential at Beartrack-Arnett.
Positive factors
- High Grade
- Significant Width
- Exceptional Grade-Width Product
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · text
“3.49 g/t over 115.4 meters”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BT22-242DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 10.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT22-242D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-12-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade historical intercept over a good width indicates high-grade zones within the Beartrack-Arnett project.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Strong Grade-Width Product
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · text
“10.12 g/t gold over 11.4 meters”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BT21-240DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 4.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 110.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT21-240D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 110.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptional historical intercept with a very strong grade-width product, indicating significant mineralization potential at Beartrack-Arnett.
Positive factors
- High Grade
- Significant Width
- Exceptional Grade-Width Product
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · text
“4.34 g/t over 110.6 meters”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BT21-240DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT21-240D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade historical intercept over a good width indicates high-grade zones within the Beartrack-Arnett project.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Strong Grade-Width Product
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · text
“12 g/t gold over 13.7 meters”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BT21-240DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 8.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT21-240D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade historical intercept over a good width indicates high-grade zones within the Beartrack-Arnett project.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Strong Grade-Width Product
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
Evidence · text
“8.8 g/t gold over 11.8 meters”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.