Revival Gold Provides Update and Latest Results From Drilling at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Utah
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-12 23:10:36 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold has released assay results from ten additional drill holes at its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, completing 108 of 130 planned holes. Highlight intersections include 1.3 g/t gold over 18.3 meters in RM25-127 and 0.46 g/t gold over 56.4 meters in RM25-133. These results are consistent with the project's PEA estimates and indicate potential upside by extending mineralization outside current pit designs, supporting a planned 2026 Pre-Feasibility Study.
Reasoning: Revival Gold's latest drill results from the Mercur Gold Project are positive, confirming gold occurrence and leachability consistent with PEA estimates. Key intercepts extend mineralization beyond current pit designs, suggesting resource expansion potential and supporting the upcoming PFS. Data reliability is high due to robust QA/QC and QP oversight, though specific true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Positive factors
- Drill results are consistent with previous PEA estimates, confirming geological and metallurgical models.
- Several intercepts extend mineralization outside current pit designs, indicating potential resource upside.
- The drilling program supports a planned Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS), advancing the project towards production.
- Comprehensive QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab use and QP sign-off, ensuring data reliability.
- Compositing parameters (cut-off grade and internal dilution rules) are transparently stated.
Negative factors
- True width is not explicitly stated for individual intercepts, only a general estimate is provided, which may overstate actual thickness.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 23
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release explicitly states that 'Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream.'
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The technical information was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP.
Evidence · text
“Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.”
Certified Labpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: ALS Minerals, the laboratory performing analyses, is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: Mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a stated 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.
Evidence · text
“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states that 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width' rather than providing specific true widths for each intercept.
Evidence · text
“True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The company states it is 'currently infill drilling inferred resources'.
Evidence · text
“We are currently infill drilling inferred resources”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The company 'hit several intercepts outside the resource area, indicating potential upside' and specifically mentions holes RM25-126, RM25-134 and RM25-133 extending outside current pit designs.
Evidence · text
“hit several intercepts outside the resource area, indicating potential upside”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 23. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (23)
RM25-115Mercur · goldGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-115
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-115:3-9.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 320 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-115Mercur · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-115
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 19.8 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-115:19.8-24.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 320 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-115Mercur · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-115
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.4 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 73.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-115:45.7-73.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 320 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a strong continuity width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Strong continuity width
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 27.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-116Mercur · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-116
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 4.6 m
- To
- 12.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-116:4.6-12.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-116Mercur · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-116
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 25.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-116:21.3-25.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-116Mercur · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-116
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-116:48.8-67.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade over a moderate width, identified as a highlight intersection and consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Weak grade over moderate width
- Highlight intersection
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 18.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-122Mercur · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-122
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.4 m
- From
- 56.4 m
- To
- 80.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 56.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-122:56.4-80.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade over a strong continuity width, identified as a highlight intersection and consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Weak grade over strong continuity width
- Highlight intersection
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 24.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-126Mercur · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-126
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.9 m
- From
- 16.8 m
- To
- 42.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-126:16.8-42.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 220 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a strong continuity width, extending outside current pit designs and consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Strong continuity width
- Extends outside current pit designs
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 25.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-127Mercur · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-127
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 7.6 m
- To
- 13.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-127:7.6-13.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-127Mercur · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-127
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 51.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-127:33.5-51.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a moderate width, identified as a highlight intersection and consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade over moderate width
- Highlight intersection
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: 18.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-129Mercur · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-129
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 7.6 m
- To
- 13.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-129:7.6-13.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Weak grade
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-129Mercur · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-129
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-129:36.6-45.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-129Mercur · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-129
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 50.3 m
- To
- 57.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-129:50.3-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-129Mercur · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-129
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 65.5 m
- To
- 73.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-129:65.5-73.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 210 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-133Mercur · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-133
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 7.6 m
- To
- 12.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-133:7.6-12.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-133Mercur · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 56.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-133
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 56.4 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 109.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-133:53.3-109.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade over a continuous width, identified as a highlight intersection and extending outside current pit designs, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Weak grade over continuous width
- Highlight intersection
- Extends outside current pit designs
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 56.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-134Mercur · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-134
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 9.1 m
- To
- 12.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-134:9.1-12.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 70 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a narrow width, extending outside current pit designs and consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Extends outside current pit designs
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-134Mercur · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-134
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 50.3 m
- To
- 57.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-134:50.3-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 70 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Weak grade
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RM25-134Mercur · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-134
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 76.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM25-134:67.1-76.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 70 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Weak grade
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RMC25-016Mercur · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-016
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 43.8 m
- To
- 45.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-016:43.8-45.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a narrow width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RMC25-016Mercur · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-016
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.4 m
- From
- 51.6 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-016:51.6-80
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a strong continuity width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Strong continuity width
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 28.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RMC25-018Mercur · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-018
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 16.5 m
- To
- 19.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-018:16.5-19.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a narrow width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Narrow width
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
RMC25-018Mercur · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-018
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.9 m
- From
- 37.6 m
- To
- 54.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RMC25-018:37.6-54.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Rover
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a moderate width, consistent with project expectations, but only apparent width is reported.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade over moderate width
- Consistent with PEA estimates
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.96”
Context: 16.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.