Revival Gold Reports Additional Infill Results with 2026 Drilling Now 64% Complete at Mercur
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG.V
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Utah, U.S.A.
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-22 12:46:24 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold has reported additional infill RC drilling results at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah, confirming consistent gold grades in oxidized material suitable for heap leaching. The results support the 2025 PEA estimates and highlight potential expansion opportunities, including the reprocessing of 9 million tonnes of legacy ROM heap leach material.
Reasoning: The release provides routine infill drilling results that confirm existing geological models and highlight potential upside in legacy material, supporting the project's development path.
Positive factors
- Consistent infill results supporting previous PEA grade and leachability estimates
- Potential for expansion of heap leachable material
- Identification of 9 million tonnes of legacy ROM material for potential reprocessing
- QA/QC protocols and accredited laboratory usage disclosed
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The release explicitly states these are 'additional infill results' from the 2026 drilling program.
Evidence · text
“Revival Gold Reports Additional Infill Results”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The document provides detailed QA/QC protocols, including the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and accredited laboratories.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: While a cutoff is mentioned in the notes, it is not explicitly stated as the primary compositing cutoff for the headline intervals in the prose, though note 3 provides context.
Evidence · text
“Mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/T cutoff grade”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (4)
RM26-213Mercur · goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-213
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.5 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 64.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-213:31-64.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Standard infill intercept confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- Solid width and grade for oxidized material
Evidence · text
“0.92 grams per tonne ("g/T") gold over 33.5 meters width at 31 meters downhole in RM26-213”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-217Mercur · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-217
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.5 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 50.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-217:20-50.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Standard infill intercept.
Positive factors
- Good width
Evidence · text
“0.57 g/T gold over 30.5 meters width at 20 meters downhole in RM26-217”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-220Mercur · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-220
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-220:26-55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Standard infill intercept.
Positive factors
- Good width
Evidence · text
“0.75 g/T gold over 29.0 meters width at 26 meters downhole in RM26-220”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-223Mercur · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-223
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 30.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-223:8-30.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Standard infill intercept.
Positive factors
- Good width
Evidence · text
“0.76 g/T gold over 22.9 meters width at 8 meters downhole in RM26-223”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.