Roscan Gold Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Kandiolé Gold Project in Mali

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Roscan Gold Corporation
Ticker
ROS
Exchange
TSX
Region
Mali
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Economic study
Extracted
2026-09-18 18:51:50 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Roscan Gold has announced a positive Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Kandiolé Gold Project in Mali, reporting a base case after-tax NPV (5%) of US$498 million and an IRR of 43%. The project features an ~13-year mine life with an average annual production of approximately 92,786 oz of gold and an AISC of US$1,568/oz.

Reasoning: The announcement of a positive PEA with robust economics and a high-confidence resource base (97% Indicated) is a significant development for a junior explorer.

Positive factors

  • Strong base case economics (43% IRR, US$498M NPV)
  • High sensitivity to gold price (85% IRR at spot)
  • High proportion of Indicated resource (97% of mill feed)
  • Free-milling mineralization noted

Negative factors

  • PEA level accuracy (±30%)
  • Inclusion of Inferred resources in the economic model
  • Project is in Mali (Tier-3 jurisdiction)

Facts used in scoring: 3

Classification and evidence

PEA Onlyneutral

Only Class 4 / Initial Assessment economics available. Not bankable.

Why it applies: The announcement is for a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).

Evidence · text

“Preliminary Economic Assessment (the "PEA" or "Study")”

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The project contains a significant Indicated resource component.

Evidence · text

“1.283 Moz Au indicated resource”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The project includes an Inferred resource component.

Evidence · text

“0.09 Moz Au inferred resource”

Free Millingpositive · Story-specific tag

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: Metallurgical test work indicates predominantly free-milling mineralization.

Evidence · text

“mineralization is predominantly free-milling”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mark Kenwright, FAusIMM CP(Geo) is named as the Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“approved by Mr. Mark Kenwright, FAusIMM CP(Geo)”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The source explicitly discloses a revised resource estimate

Evidence · text

“updated mineral resource estimate”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (2)

indicatedKandiolé Gold Project · goldTonnes: 58200000Grade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.283Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kandiolé Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
mali
Reported Region
Mali
Ticker
ROS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:134f89456f6c49249838
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
58200000
Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.283
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-19

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant indicated resource component.

Positive factors

  • Large indicated resource

Evidence · text

“1.283 Moz Au indicated resource (58.2 Mt at 0.68 g/t)”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredKandiolé Gold Project · goldTonnes: 5600000Grade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.09Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kandiolé Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
mali
Reported Region
Mali
Ticker
ROS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-02-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:c3bcbf21afb428eec861
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
5600000
Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.09
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-02-19

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource is speculative.

Negative factors

  • Speculative category

Evidence · text

“0.09 Moz Au inferred resource (5.6 Mt at 0.52 g/t)”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.