Route 109 Confirms Prophyry-Style Gold-Copper-Molybdenum Mineralization at Dunlop Bay

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Route 109 Resources Inc.
Ticker
RTE
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Molybdenum, Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-12 23:18:32 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Route 109 Resources Inc. has announced drill results from its 2025 winter program at the Dunlop Bay property in Quebec, confirming the presence of a porphyry-style gold-copper-molybdenum mineralized system. The results from drillholes BD-25-31 and BD-25-32 show anomalous grades that suggest a larger, continuous mineralized system may exist at depth along a 2km N-S trend.

Reasoning: The drilling confirms a porphyry-style system (Au-Cu-Mo) which is a new and significant geological interpretation for the property, though the intercepts are relatively narrow and shallow.

Positive factors

  • Confirmation of porphyry-style mineralization
  • Anomalous Au-Cu-Mo results
  • Discovery of new mineralization style in the region

Negative factors

  • Untested 38m gap between drillholes due to overburden

Facts used in scoring: 91

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 91. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (91)

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 7.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
7.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
18.5 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:18.5-19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 7.05 g/t Au over 0.5m is a strong gold intercept for a porphyry-style system.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept

Evidence · text

“going up to 7.05 ppm Au, 11.60 ppm Ag, 569 ppm Cu over 0.5 meter in drillhole BD-25-31”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 7.05 g/t Au is high grade for a porphyry system.

Evidence · text

“7.05 ppm Au”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release mentions the program was supervised by a Qualified Person and implies industry standard practices.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person Maxime Bouchard, Geo, M.Sc. (OGQ #1752)... has reviewed, and approved the geological information”
BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 569Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
569
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
18.5 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:18.5-19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 569 ppm Cu (0.057%) is anomalous in the context of the gold intercept.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous copper in gold intercept

Evidence · text

“569 ppm Cu over 0.5 meter in drillhole BD-25-31”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-32Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-32
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.85 m
From
104.6 m
To
108.45 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-32:104.6-108.45
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 0.13% Cu over 3.85m is a notable copper intercept for this system.

Positive factors

  • Significant width for copper intercept

Evidence · text

“copper (0.13% Cu over 3.85 meters in drillhole BD-25-32)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 1620Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
1620
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
52 m
To
52.5 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:52-52.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 1620 ppm Mo is a very strong intercept for a porphyry system.

Positive factors

  • High molybdenum grade

Evidence · text

“molybdenum (going up to 1620 ppm Mo over 0.50 meter in drillhole BD-25-31)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
11.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
18.5 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:18.5-19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.6”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
18.5 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:18.5-19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 17Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
17
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
18.5 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:18.5-19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 17 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“17”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 88Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
88
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
18.5 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:18.5-19
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 88 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“88”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.024Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
34 m
To
34.5 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:34-34.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.024 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.024 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
34 m
To
34.5 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:34-34.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 157Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
157
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
34 m
To
34.5 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:34-34.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 157 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“157”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 136Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
136
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
34 m
To
34.5 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:34-34.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 136 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“136”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
34 m
To
34.5 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:34-34.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 80Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
80
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
34 m
To
34.5 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:34-34.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 80 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“80”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.291Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.291
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
50 m
To
50.5 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:50-50.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.291 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.291”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
50 m
To
50.5 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:50-50.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 136Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
136
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
50 m
To
50.5 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:50-50.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 136 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“136”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
50 m
To
50.5 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:50-50.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
50 m
To
50.5 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:50-50.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 96Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
96
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
50 m
To
50.5 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:50-50.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 96 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“96”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.048
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
52 m
To
52.5 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:52-52.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.048 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.048 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.048”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
52 m
To
52.5 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:52-52.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 206Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
206
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
52 m
To
52.5 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:52-52.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 206 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“206”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
52 m
To
52.5 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:52-52.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“3”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 103Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
103
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
52 m
To
52.5 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:52-52.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 103 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“103”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.391Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.391
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
57.5 m
To
58 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:57.5-58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.391 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.391”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
57.5 m
To
58 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:57.5-58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 173Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
173
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
57.5 m
To
58 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:57.5-58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 173 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“173”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
9
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
57.5 m
To
58 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:57.5-58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
57.5 m
To
58 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:57.5-58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“3”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
100
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
57.5 m
To
58 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:57.5-58
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 100 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“100”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.152Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.152
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
73.4 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:72.9-73.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.152 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.152”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
73.4 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:72.9-73.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 1130Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
1130
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
73.4 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:72.9-73.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1130 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1130”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
73.4 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:72.9-73.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
73.4 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:72.9-73.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 92Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
92
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
72.9 m
To
73.4 m
Intercept Depth
72.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:72.9-73.4
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 92 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“92”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.136Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.136
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
192 m
To
192.5 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:192-192.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.136 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.136 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.136”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
192 m
To
192.5 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:192-192.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 389Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
389
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
192 m
To
192.5 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:192-192.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 389 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“389”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 23Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
23
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
192 m
To
192.5 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:192-192.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 23 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“23”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
192 m
To
192.5 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:192-192.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 71Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
71
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.5 m
From
192 m
To
192.5 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:192-192.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 71 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“71”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.126Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.126
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
41.8 m
To
43 m
Intercept Depth
41.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:41.8-43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.126 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.126 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.126”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
41.8 m
To
43 m
Intercept Depth
41.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:41.8-43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 34Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
34
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.2 m
From
41.8 m
To
43 m
Intercept Depth
41.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:41.8-43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 34 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“34”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.2 m
From
41.8 m
To
43 m
Intercept Depth
41.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:41.8-43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“1”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.2 m
From
41.8 m
To
43 m
Intercept Depth
41.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:41.8-43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
32
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.2 m
From
41.8 m
To
43 m
Intercept Depth
41.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:41.8-43
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 32 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“32”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.427Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.427
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
49.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:49.2-51.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.427 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.427”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
49.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:49.2-51.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.47 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.47 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 95.32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
95.32
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.5 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
49.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:49.2-51.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 95.32 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“95.32”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 11.12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
11.12
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.5 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
49.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:49.2-51.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11.12 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“11.12”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.5 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
49.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:49.2-51.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 24.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
24.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.5 m
From
49.2 m
To
51.7 m
Intercept Depth
49.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:49.2-51.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 24.6 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“24.6”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.219Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.219
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
58.5 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:58.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.219 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.219”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
58.5 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:58.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 55Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
55
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
58.5 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:58.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 55 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“55”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
58.5 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:58.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
58.5 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:58.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“3”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 27Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
27
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.5 m
From
58.5 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
58.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:58.5-60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 27 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“27”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.344Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.344
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
63 m
To
63.7 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:63-63.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.344 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.344”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
63 m
To
63.7 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:63-63.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 12Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.7 m
From
63 m
To
63.7 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:63-63.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 12 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“12”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.7 m
From
63 m
To
63.7 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:63-63.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.7 m
From
63 m
To
63.7 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:63-63.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 25Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
25
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.7 m
From
63 m
To
63.7 m
Intercept Depth
63 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:63-63.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“25”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.706Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.706
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.5 m
To
74.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:73.5-74.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.706 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.706 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.706”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.5 m
To
74.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:73.5-74.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 67Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
67
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.5 m
To
74.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:73.5-74.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 67 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“67”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.5 m
To
74.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:73.5-74.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 10Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.5 m
To
74.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:73.5-74.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“10”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
42
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
73.5 m
To
74.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:73.5-74.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 42 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“42”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.3 m
Intercept Depth
98.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:98.4-99.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.3 m
Intercept Depth
98.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:98.4-99.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 420Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
420
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.9 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.3 m
Intercept Depth
98.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:98.4-99.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 420 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“420”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.9 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.3 m
Intercept Depth
98.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:98.4-99.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“3”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.9 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.3 m
Intercept Depth
98.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:98.4-99.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“5”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 56Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
56
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.9 m
From
98.4 m
To
99.3 m
Intercept Depth
98.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:98.4-99.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 56 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“56”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.242Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.242
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.85 m
From
104.6 m
To
108.45 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:104.6-108.45
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.242 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.242”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
2.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.85 m
From
104.6 m
To
108.45 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:104.6-108.45
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.38”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 1283.97Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
1283.97
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.85 m
From
104.6 m
To
108.45 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:104.6-108.45
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1283.97 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1283.97”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 12.86Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
12.86
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.85 m
From
104.6 m
To
108.45 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:104.6-108.45
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 12.86 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“12.86”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.85 m
From
104.6 m
To
108.45 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:104.6-108.45
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 36.52Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
36.52
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.85 m
From
104.6 m
To
108.45 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:104.6-108.45
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 36.52 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“36.52”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · goldGrade: 0.205Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
0.205
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
133.5 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
133.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:133.5-134.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.205 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.205”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
133.5 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
133.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:133.5-134.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.7”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · copperGrade: 11Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
133.5 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
133.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:133.5-134.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“11”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · molybdenumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
133.5 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
133.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:133.5-134.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · leadGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
133.5 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
133.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:133.5-134.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7 ppm lead, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lead rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

BD-25-31Dunlop Bay West · zincGrade: 39Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
BD-25-31
Project
Dunlop Bay West
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
RTE

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.6 m
From
133.5 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
133.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
BD-25-31:133.5-134.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 39 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“39”

Context: Table 1: Best results from drillholes BD

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.