Roxmore Resources Reports Strong Exploration Drill Results and Expanded Resource Potential from the Converse Gold Project in Nevada
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Roxmore Resources Inc.
- Ticker
- RM.TO
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Nevada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 20:50:15 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Roxmore Resources reported strong exploration drill results from the Converse Gold Project in Nevada, specifically hole CV26-013C which returned 58.2m at 1.85 g/t Au and 4.43 g/t Ag. The results represent a step-out from the existing resource and suggest the Redline mineralized system extends westward into a larger magnetic anomaly.
Reasoning: The release reports high-grade step-out drill results that extend the known Redline mineralized system, supported by geophysical anomalies.
Positive factors
- Strong gold and silver grades in step-out hole CV26-013C
- Extension of known mineralized system westward
- Geophysical data supports larger scale potential
- QA/QC protocols and QP sign-off disclosed
Negative factors
- True widths are only estimated (75-100% of core length)
Facts used in scoring: 5
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Hole CV26-013C stepped out 90 meters from the current mineral resource.
Evidence · text
“stepping out 90 meters from the current mineral resource”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes detailed QA/QC protocols, including lab names (ALS, Actlabs) and sampling methods.
Evidence · text
“The core is cut in half and placed in plastic bags, zip-tied and grouped in burlap sacks and sealed for transport to either the ALS Global preparation facility in Elko, Nevada, or to the Actlabs facility in Kamloops, B.C.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: True widths are not explicitly stated, only estimated as 75-100% of core length.
Evidence · text
“True widths are estimated to be 75-100% of the reported core lengths.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Vance Spalding is named as the Qualified Person who reviewed and approved the disclosure.
Evidence · text
“Vance Spalding, Executive Vice President, Exploration of Roxmore, is a "Qualified Person" as defined under National Instrument 43-101”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (5)
CV26-013CConverse · goldGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 58.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CV26-013C
- Project
- Converse
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- RM.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 58.2 m
- From
- 484 m
- To
- 542.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 589 m
- Intercept Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CV26-013C:484-542.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Redline mineralized system
- Easting
- 476887
- Northing
- 4506331
- CRS
- NAD 83 UTM Zone 11N
- Elevation
- 1522 m
- Azimuth
- 64 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global and Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant step-out intercept confirming mineralization extension.
Positive factors
- Strong grade over significant width
Negative factors
- True width only estimated
Evidence · text
“58.2m grading 1.85 g/t Au and 4.43 g/t Ag from 484m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CV26-013CConverse · silverGrade: 4.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 58.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CV26-013C
- Project
- Converse
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- RM.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 58.2 m
- From
- 484 m
- To
- 542.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 589 m
- Intercept Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CV26-013C:484-542.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Redline mineralized system
- Easting
- 476887
- Northing
- 4506331
- CRS
- NAD 83 UTM Zone 11N
- Elevation
- 1522 m
- Azimuth
- 64 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global and Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver byproduct in a gold-focused intercept.
Evidence · text
“58.2m grading 1.85 g/t Au and 4.43 g/t Ag from 484m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CV26-013CConverse · goldGrade: 4.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CV26-013C
- Project
- Converse
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- RM.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 589 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CV26-013C:sub-interval
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Redline mineralized system
- Easting
- 476887
- Northing
- 4506331
- CRS
- NAD 83 UTM Zone 11N
- Elevation
- 1522 m
- Azimuth
- 64 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global and Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade interval within the main intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade within the composite
Evidence · text
“19.8m grading 4.83 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CV26-013CConverse · silverGrade: 9.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CV26-013C
- Project
- Converse
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- RM.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 589 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CV26-013C:sub-interval
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Redline mineralized system
- Easting
- 476887
- Northing
- 4506331
- CRS
- NAD 83 UTM Zone 11N
- Elevation
- 1522 m
- Azimuth
- 64 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global and Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver byproduct in a high-grade gold sub-interval.
Evidence · text
“9.94 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CONV-030CConverse · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 81.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CONV-030C
- Project
- Converse
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- RM.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 81.8 m
- From
- 522.1 m
- To
- 603.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Redline mineralized system
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global and Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-03T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant step-out intercept confirming mineralization extension.
Positive factors
- Strong grade over significant width
Negative factors
- True width only estimated
Evidence · text
“81.8 m grading 0.55 g/t Au and 2.93 g/t Ag from 522.1 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.