Scorpio Gold Drills 3.02 g/t Gold over 48.92 Metres from 118.87 Metres and 1.19 g/t Gold over 99.94 Metres from 98.61 Metres at the Goldwedge Target at Manhattan
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Scorpio Gold
- Ticker
- SGN
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 12:09:31 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Scorpio Gold has reported significant gold drill results from the Goldwedge target at the Manhattan project. Notable intercepts include 3.02 g/t gold over 48.92 metres and a high-grade 19.29 g/t gold interval over 5.24 metres.
Reasoning: The announcement reports high-grade gold intercepts with significant width, including a bonanza-style interval and a very wide low-grade intercept, suggesting strong mineralization at the Goldwedge target.
Positive factors
- Significant gold intercepts reported
- High-grade bonanza-style interval (19.29 g/t Au)
- Strong continuity with 99.94m intercept
Facts used in scoring: 6
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 19.29 g/t gold over 5.24 m exceeds the underground/orogenic gold exceptional threshold.
Evidence · text
“19.29 g/t gold over 5.24 m”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: New drill results at the Goldwedge target suggest expansion of known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“at the Goldwedge Target at Manhattan”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (6)
26MN-115Manhattan · goldGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-115
- Project
- Manhattan
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48.92 m
- From
- 118.87 m
- To
- 167.79 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.87 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-115:118.87-167.79
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Solid gold intercept with significant width.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“3.02 g/t gold over 48.92 metres ("m") from 118.87 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MN-115Manhattan · goldGrade: 19.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-115
- Project
- Manhattan
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.24 m
- From
- 151.79 m
- To
- 157.03 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.87 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-115:151.79-157.03
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Bonanza grade intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade
Evidence · text
“19.29 g/t gold over 5.24 m from 151.79 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MN-115Manhattan · goldGrade: 5.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-115
- Project
- Manhattan
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.15 m
- From
- 173.58 m
- To
- 183.73 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.87 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-115:173.58-183.73
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong intercept at a geological contact.
Positive factors
- Good grade and width
Evidence · text
“5.14 g/t gold over 10.15 m from 173.58 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MN-115Manhattan · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-115
- Project
- Manhattan
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.7 m
- From
- 210.92 m
- To
- 227.62 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118.87 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-115:210.92-227.62
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lower grade intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade
Evidence · text
“0.46 g/t gold over 16.70 m from 210.92 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MN-118Manhattan · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 99.94 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-118
- Project
- Manhattan
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 99.94 m
- From
- 98.61 m
- To
- 198.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-118:98.61-198.55
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Extremely wide intercept providing significant continuity.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept
Evidence · text
“1.19 g/t gold over 99.94 m from 98.61 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26MN-118Manhattan · goldGrade: 5.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-118
- Project
- Manhattan
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.16 m
- From
- 98.61 m
- To
- 102.77 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-118:98.61-102.77
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade interval, but depth range is incomplete in text.
Positive factors
- High grade
Evidence · text
“5.13 g/t gold over 4.16 m from.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.