Scottie Resources Intercepts 7.43 g/t Gold over 18.75 M and 37 g/t Gold over 2.85 M at Blueberry Contact Zone at Scottie Gold Mine Project, BC
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Scottie Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- SCOT
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 13:16:19 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Scottie Resources has reported new high-grade gold drill results from its 2025 drilling program at the Blueberry Contact Zone of the Scottie Gold Mine Project in British Columbia. Notable intercepts include 7.43 g/t gold over 18.75 metres and 37 g/t gold over 2.85 metres.
Reasoning: The announcement reports high-grade gold intercepts (7.43 g/t over 18.75 m) at the Blueberry Contact Zone, which is a key target within the Scottie Gold Mine Project.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts reported
- Significant width on primary intercept
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: New assays from 2025 drilling at the Blueberry Contact Zone suggest expansion of known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“report new assays from its 2025 drilling of the Blueberry Contact Zone”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 7.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.75 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Blueberry Contact Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 7.43 g/t over 18.75 m is a strong intercept for an orogenic gold system.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“7.43 g/t Gold over 18.75 M”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Blueberry Contact Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-09-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 37 g/t gold represents a high-grade/bonanza style intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade intercept
Evidence · text
“37 g/t Gold over 2.85 M”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.