Scottie Resources Intercepts 8.37 g/t Gold over 8.45 m and 122 g/t Gold over 1.2 m at Blueberry Contact Zone at Scottie Gold Mine Project, BC
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Scottie Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- SCOT
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 13:13:01 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Scottie Resources reported new high-grade gold drill results from the Blueberry Contact Zone at the Scottie Gold Mine Project in BC. Notable intercepts include 8.37 g/t Au over 8.45 m and a high-grade 122 g/t Au over 1.2 m.
Reasoning: The announcement reports two significant gold intercepts at the Blueberry Contact Zone, including a high-grade 122 g/t Au interval.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts reported
- Blueberry Contact Zone exploration success
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 122 g/t gold significantly exceeds the orogenic gold exceptional threshold of 15 g/t.
Evidence · text
“122 g/t Gold over 1.2 m”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: New assays from 2025 drilling at the Blueberry Contact Zone suggest exploration success.
Evidence · text
“report new assays from its 2025 drilling of the Blueberry Contact Zone”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 8.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Blueberry Contact Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 8.37 g/t over 8.45 m is a strong intercept for an orogenic gold system.
Positive factors
- Solid grade and width intercept
Evidence · text
“8.37 g/t Gold over 8.45 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 122Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 122
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Blueberry Contact Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 122 g/t gold is a bonanza-grade intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade intercept
Evidence · text
“122 g/t Gold over 1.2 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.