Selkirk Copper Announces Initial Results from the Phase 2 Drill Program and Commencement of Technical Data Collection to Support Planned Feasibility Study

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Selkirk Copper Mines Inc.
Ticker
SCMI
Exchange
TSX
Region
Yukon, Canada
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-14 22:39:34 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Selkirk Copper announced initial high-grade drill results from its Phase 2 program at the Minto Project in Yukon, Canada, including 4.28% CuEq over 5.9m at Minto East and 2.59% CuEq over 4.5m at Minto North. The company is ahead of schedule on its 50,000-meter drill program, which aims to expand and infill priority resource areas. Concurrently, technical data collection has begun to support a planned feasibility study, and an updated Mineral Resource Estimate is on track for completion in July.

Reasoning: The initial Phase 2 drill results demonstrate high-grade copper-gold-silver mineralization, extending known zones and confirming continuity, which supports the ongoing resource update and planned feasibility study for the Minto Project. The program is ahead of schedule, indicating strong operational execution.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper-gold-silver intercepts
  • Step-out drilling extends mineralization
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity in priority areas
  • Phase 2 drill program is ahead of schedule
  • Commencement of technical data collection for planned feasibility study
  • Detailed QA/QC procedures disclosed with certified lab and QP sign-off
  • Resource estimate prepared to CIM Definition Standards and Best Practices Guidelines
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are transparently disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width is estimated for the overall program but not explicitly stated for each intercept

Facts used in scoring: 58

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole 26SCM178 intersected 2.33% Cu, 1.98 g/t Au, and 22.3 g/t Ag (4.28% CuEq) over 5.9 m, which is an exceptionally high-grade zone for copper equivalent.

Evidence · table

“4.28”

Context: 5.9

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole 26SCM183 intersected 2.22% Cu, 0.41 g/t Au, and 5.3 g/t Ag (2.59% CuEq) over 4.5 m, which is an exceptionally high-grade zone for copper equivalent.

Evidence · table

“2.59”

Context: 4.5

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling at Minto East and Minto North included step-out holes (e.g., 26SCM178, 26SCM183) that extended mineralization beyond previously known limits.

Evidence · text

“At Minto East, a 50-metre step-out intersected 2.33% Cu, 1.98 g/t Au, and 22.3 g/t Ag (4.28% CuEq) over 4.3 m, in 26SCM178. At Minto North, a 30-metre step-out intersected 2.22% Cu, 0.41 g/t Au, and 5.3 g/t Ag (2.59% CuEq) over 4.5 m, in 26SCM183”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified reference material, coarse blank materials, field duplicate analysis, and states that ALS Vancouver holds an ISO/IEC 17025 standard accreditation.

Evidence · text

“QAQC Procedures and Data Validation The Company is drilling NQ sized core. Following data collection, core is cut along the long axis, with half of the core going to the lab for chemical analysis and the remaining half kept in sequence as record. The half core samples are packaged with the corresponding sample tag id and sealed. All sampling is conducted by Selkirk Copper Mines Inc. and subject to Company standard internal quality control and quality assurance (QAQC) programs. QAQC procedures include the insertion of certified reference material, coarse blank materials, and field duplicate analysis, as well as standard laboratory procedures to monitor contamination during preparation, analytical accuracy, and precision. QAQC insertion rates by Selkirk Copper approximate 15% of all samples at set intervals. For the Phase 2 drill program, all samples were sent to ALS's prep facility in Whitehorse, then shipped to ALS's analytical laboratory in Vancouver. All samples are prepared by crushing rock to 70% passing 2mm screen, then splitting a 250g sub-sample using a riffle splitter before being pulverized 85% passing 75 microns. Gold is analyzed by 30 g Fire Assay (Au-AA23) with atomic absorption (AAS) analysis followed by gravimetric finish for overlimit results. Copper is analyzed by four-acid digest (ME-ICP61) with inductivity coupled plasma - atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) finish. If copper overlimit results are triggered a second four-acid digest for high grade copper (Cu-OG62) is conducted. Samples containing greater than 1000 ppm copper are also analyzed for soluble copper using a sulphuric acid leach (Cu-AA05) analysis with AAS finish is performed. ALS Vancouver holds an ISO/IEC 17025 standard accreditation. QAQC results are reviewed by Selkirk Copper upon receipt of assay results. Overall, QAQC results show strong analytical performance across Cu, Au, and Ag datasets. All control standards are within acceptable tolerance, with no significant outliers or systematic bias observed.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The CuEq calculation formula, commodity prices, and recovery assumptions are explicitly stated in the significant interval table notes.

Evidence · table

“CuEq Calculation: CuEq = ((Cu% × CuP × RCu × 2204.62)+(Au g/t ÷ 31.1035 × AuP × RAu) + (Ag g/t ÷ 31.1035 × AgP × RAg ))/(CuP × RCu × 2204.62) Where: CuP/AuP/AgP = US$ commodity prices of $4.25/lb Cu, $2500/oz Au, $29/oz Ag; RCu = Cu Recovery = 98%; RAu = Au Recovery = 85%; RAg= Ag Recovery = 85% Recoveries as estimated from historical mineral processing results.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Primary intervals are reported as drill core length, with true widths only estimated to be approximately 90% of core lengths for the overall program, not specifically for each intercept.

Evidence · text

“Primary intervals are reported as drill core length, with true widths estimated to be approximately 90% of core lengths, based on the sub-horizontal to shallow-dipping nature of the modelled mineralized zones.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Holes 26SCM175, 26SCM177, and 26SCM186 are explicitly stated as infill drilling to confirm grade and continuity in priority resource areas.

Evidence · text

“Initial results from infill drilling confirm continuity and increase confidence in priority resource areas: At 117 Lens, 1.02% Cu, 0.35 g/t Au, and 4.2 g/t Ag (1.35% CuEq) over 22.7 m , from 316.9 m in 26SCM175.”

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes significant tonnages in the Indicated category for both open pit and underground mining methods.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: 6,085

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes significant tonnages in the Inferred category for both open pit and underground mining methods.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 9,496

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate has been completed by Sue Bird of Moose Mountain Technical Services (MMTS), who is a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“The MRE has been completed by Sue Bird of Moose Mountain Technical Services (MMTS).”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: Resources are reported using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards and were estimated using the 2019 CIM Best Practices Guidelines, which are compliant with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Resources are reported using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards and were estimated using the 2019 CIM Best Practices Guidelines.”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Cut-off grades of C$30 for open pit and C$80 for underground are clearly stated for the resource estimate.

Evidence · table

“$30”

Context: OP

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document announces an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Minto Project.

Evidence · text

“The 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate and Preliminary Economic Assessment is being finalized and on track for completion in July.”

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 58. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (54)

26SCM174Minto East · copperGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM174
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
72.8 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
72.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM174:72.8-75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384905
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall positive results of the program, though the length is narrow.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM174Minto East · goldGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM174
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
72.8 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
72.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM174:72.8-75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384905
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good gold grade within a narrow intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM174Minto East · silverGrade: 12.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM174
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
12.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
From
72.8 m
To
75 m
Hole Depth
447 m
Intercept Depth
72.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM174:72.8-75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384905
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within a narrow intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.6”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM175Minto East · copperGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM175
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22.7 m
From
316.9 m
To
339.5 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
316.9 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM175:316.9-339.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto Main
Easting
384726
Northing
6944712
Azimuth
341.5 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong copper grade over a significant width from infill drilling, confirming continuity in a priority resource area.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 22.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM175Minto East · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM175
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.7 m
From
316.9 m
To
339.5 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
316.9 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM175:316.9-339.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto Main
Easting
384726
Northing
6944712
Azimuth
341.5 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good gold grade over a significant width from infill drilling, confirming continuity in a priority resource area.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 22.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM175Minto East · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM175
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.7 m
From
316.9 m
To
339.5 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
316.9 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM175:316.9-339.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto Main
Easting
384726
Northing
6944712
Azimuth
341.5 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit over a significant width from infill drilling, confirming continuity in a priority resource area.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Significant intercept length
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: 22.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM176Minto East · copperGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM176
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.9 m
From
139.1 m
To
141 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
139.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM176:139.1-141
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384903
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
186 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.53
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall positive results of the program, though the length is narrow.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: 1.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM176Minto East · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM176
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
From
139.1 m
To
141 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
139.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM176:139.1-141
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384903
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
186 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.53
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.03”

Context: 1.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM176Minto East · silverGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM176
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
9.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m
From
139.1 m
To
141 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
139.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM176:139.1-141
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384903
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
186 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.53
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within a narrow intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“9.6”

Context: 1.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM176Minto East · copperGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM176
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.9 m
From
305.7 m
To
311.5 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
139.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM176:305.7-311.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384903
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
186 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good copper grade intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall positive results of the program.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM176Minto East · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM176
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
305.7 m
To
311.5 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
139.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM176:305.7-311.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384903
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
186 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A gold credit within an intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Gold credit
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM176Minto East · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM176
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
305.7 m
To
311.5 m
Hole Depth
357 m
Intercept Depth
139.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM176:305.7-311.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384903
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
186 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within an intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.7”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM177Minto East · copperGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM177
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.8 m
From
327.8 m
To
337.6 m
Hole Depth
354 m
Intercept Depth
327.8 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM177:327.8-337.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto Main
Easting
384726
Northing
6944712
Azimuth
298.5 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good copper grade over a moderate width from infill drilling, confirming continuity in a priority resource area.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM177Minto East · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM177
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
327.8 m
To
337.6 m
Hole Depth
354 m
Intercept Depth
327.8 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM177:327.8-337.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto Main
Easting
384726
Northing
6944712
Azimuth
298.5 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A gold credit within an intercept from infill drilling, confirming continuity in a priority resource area.

Positive factors

  • Gold credit
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM177Minto East · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM177
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
327.8 m
To
337.6 m
Hole Depth
354 m
Intercept Depth
327.8 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM177:327.8-337.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto Main
Easting
384726
Northing
6944712
Azimuth
298.5 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within an intercept from infill drilling, confirming continuity in a priority resource area.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.2”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM178Minto East · copperGrade: 1.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.91
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
90 m
To
93 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:90-93
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall positive results of the program, though the length is narrow.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.91”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
90 m
To
93 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:90-93
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good gold grade within a narrow intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · silverGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
5.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
90 m
To
93 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:90-93
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within a narrow intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.7”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.2 m
From
90 m
To
101.2 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:90-101.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good copper grade over a moderate width from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall positive results of the program.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 11.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.2 m
From
90 m
To
101.2 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:90-101.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A gold credit within a moderate intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Gold credit
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 11.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.2 m
From
90 m
To
101.2 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:90-101.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within a moderate intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 11.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · copperGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.9 m
From
142 m
To
147.9 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:142-147.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional copper grade over a good width from expansion drilling, representing a significant positive result.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.33”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · goldGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
142 m
To
147.9 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:142-147.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a good width from expansion drilling, contributing significantly to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.98”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM178Minto East · silverGrade: 22.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM178
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
22.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
142 m
To
147.9 m
Hole Depth
381 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM178:142-147.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto East
Easting
384904
Northing
6945157
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good silver grade over a good width from expansion drilling, contributing significantly to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“22.3”

Context: 5.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM181Minto East · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM181
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.3 m
From
142.3 m
To
156.6 m
Hole Depth
435 m
Intercept Depth
142.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM181:142.3-156.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Area 118
Easting
384856
Northing
6944156
Azimuth
282 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate copper grade over a moderate width from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall positive results of the program.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 14.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM181Minto East · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM181
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.3 m
From
142.3 m
To
156.6 m
Hole Depth
435 m
Intercept Depth
142.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM181:142.3-156.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Area 118
Easting
384856
Northing
6944156
Azimuth
282 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low gold grade within a moderate intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Gold credit
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 14.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM181Minto East · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM181
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.3 m
From
142.3 m
To
156.6 m
Hole Depth
435 m
Intercept Depth
142.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM181:142.3-156.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Area 118
Easting
384856
Northing
6944156
Azimuth
282 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low silver grade within a moderate intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: 14.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM181Minto East · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM181
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29.1 m
From
282.9 m
To
311.9 m
Hole Depth
435 m
Intercept Depth
142.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM181:282.9-311.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Area 118
Easting
384856
Northing
6944156
Azimuth
282 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate copper grade over a strong width from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall positive results of the program.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade
  • Strong intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 29.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM181Minto East · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM181
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.1 m
From
282.9 m
To
311.9 m
Hole Depth
435 m
Intercept Depth
142.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM181:282.9-311.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Area 118
Easting
384856
Northing
6944156
Azimuth
282 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A gold credit within a strong intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Gold credit
  • Strong intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 29.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM181Minto East · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM181
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.1 m
From
282.9 m
To
311.9 m
Hole Depth
435 m
Intercept Depth
142.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM181:282.9-311.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Area 118
Easting
384856
Northing
6944156
Azimuth
282 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low silver grade within a strong intercept from expansion drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Strong intercept length
  • Expansion drilling

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: 29.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM183Minto East · copperGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM183
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.5 m
From
116.6 m
To
121.1 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM183:116.6-121.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384556
Northing
6945969
Azimuth
291 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional copper grade over a good width from step-out drilling, indicating potential for further expansion.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM183Minto East · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM183
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
116.6 m
To
121.1 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM183:116.6-121.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384556
Northing
6945969
Azimuth
291 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good gold grade over a good width from step-out drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value and indicating potential for further expansion.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM183Minto East · silverGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM183
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
5.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
116.6 m
To
121.1 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM183:116.6-121.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384556
Northing
6945969
Azimuth
291 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within an intercept from step-out drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value and indicating potential for further expansion.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.3”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM183Minto East · copperGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM183
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.9 m
From
116.6 m
To
128.5 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM183:116.6-128.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384556
Northing
6945969
Azimuth
291 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong copper grade over a moderate width from step-out drilling, indicating potential for further expansion.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM183Minto East · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM183
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.9 m
From
116.6 m
To
128.5 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM183:116.6-128.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384556
Northing
6945969
Azimuth
291 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A gold credit within a moderate intercept from step-out drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value and indicating potential for further expansion.

Positive factors

  • Gold credit
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM183Minto East · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM183
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.9 m
From
116.6 m
To
128.5 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM183:116.6-128.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384556
Northing
6945969
Azimuth
291 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A silver credit within a moderate intercept from step-out drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value and indicating potential for further expansion.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Step-out extension

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.2”

Context: 11.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26SCM186Minto East · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM186
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
37.5 m
From
120.5 m
To
158 m
Hole Depth
222 m
Intercept Depth
120.5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM186:120.5-158
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384642
Northing
6945977
Azimuth
329 °
Dip
-68.5 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.51
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate copper grade over a continuous width from infill drilling, confirming continuity in a priority resource area.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade
  • Continuous intercept length
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 37.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM186Minto East · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM186
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37.5 m
From
120.5 m
To
158 m
Hole Depth
222 m
Intercept Depth
120.5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM186:120.5-158
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384642
Northing
6945977
Azimuth
329 °
Dip
-68.5 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.51
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low gold grade within a continuous intercept from infill drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Gold credit
  • Continuous intercept length
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 37.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

26SCM186Minto East · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26SCM186
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37.5 m
From
120.5 m
To
158 m
Hole Depth
222 m
Intercept Depth
120.5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26SCM186:120.5-158
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Location
Minto North
Easting
384642
Northing
6945977
Azimuth
329 °
Dip
-68.5 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.51
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A low silver grade within a continuous intercept from infill drilling, contributing to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Silver credit
  • Continuous intercept length
  • Infill drilling confirms continuity

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: 37.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · copperGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.9 m
From
305.7 m
To
311.5 m
Intercept Depth
305.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:305.7-311.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.13 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.13 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
305.7 m
To
311.5 m
Intercept Depth
305.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:305.7-311.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
305.7 m
To
311.5 m
Intercept Depth
305.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:305.7-311.5
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.7”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Minto East · copperGrade: 1.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.91
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
90 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:90-93
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.91 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.91 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.91”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Minto East · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
90 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:90-93
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Minto East · silverGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
5.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
90 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:90-93
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 17.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.7”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · copperGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.9 m
From
142 m
To
147.9 m
Intercept Depth
142 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:142-147.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.33 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 13.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.33 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.33”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · goldGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
142 m
To
147.9 m
Intercept Depth
142 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:142-147.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.98 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.98”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · silverGrade: 22.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
22.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.9 m
From
142 m
To
147.9 m
Intercept Depth
142 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:142-147.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 131.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 22.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.3”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29.1 m
From
282.9 m
To
311.9 m
Intercept Depth
282.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:282.9-311.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 14.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.1 m
From
282.9 m
To
311.9 m
Intercept Depth
282.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:282.9-311.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andwill demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
will demonstrate the prospectivity of the geological
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.1 m
From
282.9 m
To
311.9 m
Intercept Depth
282.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:282.9-311.9
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Minto East · copperGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Minto East
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.5 m
From
116.6 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:116.6-121.1
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.22 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 10.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.22 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Minto East · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Minto East
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
116.6 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:116.6-121.1
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Minto East · silverGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Minto East
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
5.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
116.6 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
116.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:116.6-121.1
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.3”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (4)

inferredMinto Project · copperTonnes: 23658000Grade: 1.048Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 546.8Contained Unit: mlbsView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
SCMI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Sue Bird
Resource group id
resource:0b99a8185175a1d2b95f
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23658000
Grade
1.048
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
546.8
Contained Unit
mlbs
Cutoff Grade
30
Cutoff Unit
CDN$

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-04-07

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong copper grade in the inferred category for the combined resource, representing a significant portion of the overall resource but with lower geological confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade for combined resource
  • QP signed and CIM compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category

Evidence · table

“1.048”

Context: 23,658

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredMinto Project · goldTonnes: 23658000Grade: 0.387Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 294.7Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
SCMI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Sue Bird
Resource group id
resource:0b99a8185175a1d2b95f
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23658000
Grade
0.387
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
294.7
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
30
Cutoff Unit
CDN$

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-04-07

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good gold grade in the inferred category for the combined resource, adding value to the polymetallic resource but with lower geological confidence.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade in inferred resource
  • QP signed and CIM compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category

Evidence · table

“0.387”

Context: 23,658

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredMinto Project · silverTonnes: 23658000Grade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2968.1Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
SCMI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Sue Bird
Resource group id
resource:0b99a8185175a1d2b95f
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23658000
Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2968.1
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
30
Cutoff Unit
CDN$

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-04-07

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good silver grade in the inferred category for the combined resource, adding value to the polymetallic resource but with lower geological confidence.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade in inferred resource
  • QP signed and CIM compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category

Evidence · table

“3.9”

Context: 23,658

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredMinto Project · otherTonnes: 23658000Grade: 0.068Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto Project
Commodity
other
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
SCMI

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Sue Bird
Resource group id
resource:0b99a8185175a1d2b95f
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
23658000
Grade
0.068
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
30
Cutoff Unit
CDN$

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-04-07

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: ASCu (%) data provided for the inferred combined resource, contributing to the detailed understanding of the resource.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category

Evidence · table

“0.068”

Context: 23,658

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.