# Sendero Resources Reports Drilling Results at Pe&amp;\#xF1;as Negras Project; Confirms Geological Model and Identifies Geochemical Vectors in Vicu&amp;\#xF1;a Belt, Argentina

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/sendero-resources-reports-drilling-results-at-pe-xf1-as-negras-project-confirms--9314116e-98b5-421c-bdd7-882e56349fa8

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/SEND/news/6719746161289797/sendero-resources-reports-drilling-results-at-pe-xf1-as-negras-project-confirms-

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-08-17T11:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Sendero Resources Corp.

- Ticker: SEND

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: La Rioja, Argentina

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Silver, Antimony, Copper, Molybdenum, Lead, Zinc

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-14 22:29:02 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Sendero Resources has reported reconnaissance drilling results from its Peñas Negras Project in Argentina, confirming a porphyry-epithermal geological model. The program identified gold and silver mineralization, an extensive leached cap, and significant geochemical vectors including antimony.

Reasoning: Reconnaissance drilling confirms the geological model and identifies key pathfinder elements, supporting the potential for a larger porphyry-epithermal system.

- Positive factor: Confirmation of porphyry-epithermal geological model

- Positive factor: Identification of geochemical vectors \(Sb, As, Cu, Mo, Pb, Zn\)

- Positive factor: Discovery of extensive leached cap

- Positive factor: Strong surface geochemistry in nearby targets

- Negative factor: True widths currently unknown

- Negative factor: Drilling is reconnaissance/early-stage

Facts used in scoring: 5

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: Release details laboratory \(SGS\), accreditation \(ISO/IEC 17025\), and QA/QC methods \(standards, blanks, duplicates\).

Evidence · text

> Certified reference materials \(standards\), blank samples, and field duplicates \(quarter core samples\) were inserted into sampling stream at a rate of approximately 8%.

**Apparent Width Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true widths are unknown at this stage.

Evidence · text

> True widths are unknown at this stage.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (5)

### PNDH-201

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/sendero-resources-reports-drilling-results-at-pe-xf1-as-negras-project-confirms--9314116e-98b5-421c-bdd7-882e56349fa8#fact-drill-facts-0)

Peñas Negras · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PNDH-201
- Project: Peñas Negras
- Commodity: gold
- Region: argentina
- Reported Region: argentina
- Ticker: SEND

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.04
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.5 m
- From: 14 m
- To: 15.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 14 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PNDH-201:14-15.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: medium

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 1.04 g/t Au over 1.5 m is a strong result for a reconnaissance hole in this setting.

- Positive factor: High-grade intercept for reconnaissance drilling

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### PNDH-201

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/sendero-resources-reports-drilling-results-at-pe-xf1-as-negras-project-confirms--9314116e-98b5-421c-bdd7-882e56349fa8#fact-drill-facts-1)

Peñas Negras · silver

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PNDH-201
- Project: Peñas Negras
- Commodity: silver
- Region: argentina
- Reported Region: argentina
- Ticker: SEND

#### Geometry

- Grade: 48
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.5 m
- From: 14 m
- To: 15.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 14 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PNDH-201:14-15.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: medium

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 48 g/t Ag is a significant anomaly within the gold intercept.

- Positive factor: Strong silver anomaly

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### PNDH-201

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/sendero-resources-reports-drilling-results-at-pe-xf1-as-negras-project-confirms--9314116e-98b5-421c-bdd7-882e56349fa8#fact-drill-facts-2)

Peñas Negras · silver

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PNDH-201
- Project: Peñas Negras
- Commodity: silver
- Region: argentina
- Reported Region: argentina
- Ticker: SEND

#### Geometry

- Grade: 28.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 57 m
- To: 58 m
- Intercept Depth: 57 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PNDH-201:57-58
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: medium

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 28.2 g/t Ag represents a secondary silver anomaly in the hole.

- Positive factor: Silver anomaly

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### PNDH-200

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/sendero-resources-reports-drilling-results-at-pe-xf1-as-negras-project-confirms--9314116e-98b5-421c-bdd7-882e56349fa8#fact-drill-facts-3)

Peñas Negras

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PNDH-200
- Project: Peñas Negras
- Region: argentina
- Reported Region: argentina
- Ticker: SEND

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The document states all three holes returned anomalous silver, though specific grades for PNDH-200 are not listed in the text.

- Positive factor: Silver anomaly present

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### PNDH-203

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/sendero-resources-reports-drilling-results-at-pe-xf1-as-negras-project-confirms--9314116e-98b5-421c-bdd7-882e56349fa8#fact-drill-facts-4)

Peñas Negras

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PNDH-203
- Project: Peñas Negras
- Region: argentina
- Reported Region: argentina
- Ticker: SEND

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: SGS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The document states all three holes returned anomalous silver, though specific grades for PNDH-203 are not listed in the text.

- Positive factor: Silver anomaly present

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
