Signal Gold Intersects Further High-Grade Gold at the Goldboro Project During Geotechnical Drilling, Including 23.85 g/t Gold Over 6.0 Metres
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Signal Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- ANX
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Nova Scotia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-15 11:25:51 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Signal Gold announced high-grade gold intercepts from geotechnical drilling at its Goldboro Project in Nova Scotia, including 23.85 g/t gold over 6.0 metres. These results confirm the continuity of mineralization within and near the planned open pits, supporting pit slope design and informing future resource updates. The company also noted visible gold and ongoing exploration drilling to expand the deposit westward.
Reasoning: The geotechnical drill program yielded numerous high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, which confirm the continuity of mineralization within the planned open pit areas. These results are critical for de-risking the project by supporting pit design and resource updates, while also indicating potential for westward expansion.
Positive factors
- Multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, confirm strong mineralization.
- Geotechnical drilling successfully demonstrated continuity of mineralized zones within and near planned open pits.
- Visible gold noted in several intercepts, indicating high-grade potential.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off.
- Results support refinement of the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and open pit design.
Negative factors
- True widths are estimated as a range (70-100%) rather than precisely stated for each intercept.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 36
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 36. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (36)
BR-23-394Goldboro · goldGrade: 5.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-394
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 78.1 m
- To
- 78.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-394:78.1-78.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while not exceptionally high-grade, contributes to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity within the project area.
Evidence · table
“5.73”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-394Goldboro · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-394
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 198 m
- To
- 198.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-394:198-198.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while not exceptionally high-grade, contributes to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity within the project area.
Evidence · table
“2.40”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-394Goldboro · goldGrade: 9.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-394
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 233.6 m
- To
- 235.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-394:233.6-235.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept confirms strong gold mineralization, contributing positively to the project's resource potential and continuity.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (9.02 g/t Au) exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“9.02”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 9.02 g/t gold exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“9.02”
Context: 1.5
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-394Goldboro · goldGrade: 16.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-394
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 234.1 m
- To
- 234.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-394:234.1-234.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval highlights a very high-grade zone within the broader intercept, strongly confirming the presence of significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (16.85 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“16.85”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 16.85 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“16.85”
Context: 0.5
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-396Goldboro · goldGrade: 7.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-396
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 84.6 m
- To
- 88.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-396:84.6-88.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept over a moderate width confirms strong gold mineralization, contributing positively to the project's resource potential and continuity.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (7.74 g/t Au) exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“7.74”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 7.74 g/t gold exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“7.74”
Context: 3.9
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-396Goldboro · goldGrade: 26.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-396
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 84.6 m
- To
- 85.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-396:84.6-85.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval highlights a very high-grade zone within the broader intercept, strongly confirming the presence of significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (26.25 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“26.25”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 26.25 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“26.25”
Context: 1.0
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-398Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-398
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 94.9 m
- To
- 96.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-398:94.9-96.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is below the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 1.8
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-398Goldboro · goldGrade: 4.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-398
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 116.9 m
- To
- 117.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-398:116.9-117.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while not exceptionally high-grade, contributes to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity within the project area.
Evidence · table
“4.41”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-398Goldboro · goldGrade: 25.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-398
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 137 m
- To
- 137.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-398:137-137.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept highlights a very high-grade zone, strongly confirming the presence of significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (25.52 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“25.52”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 25.52 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“25.52”
Context: 0.5
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-398Goldboro · goldGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-398
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 140.7 m
- To
- 141.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-398:140.7-141.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while not exceptionally high-grade, contributes to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity within the project area.
Evidence · table
“3.41”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 23.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 20 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:14-20
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept over a significant width represents a highly material result, strongly confirming the presence of exceptional gold mineralization within the planned open pit area.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (23.85 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
- Strong grade-width product (143.1 g/t·m) exceeds the exceptional threshold (300 g/t·m) for gold.
Evidence · table
“23.85”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 23.85 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“23.85”
Context: 6.0
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 14.5 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:14.5-15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval, while above the open pit moderate threshold (1 g/t Au), is not significant in terms of grade or width, and is lower than the parent interval.
Evidence · table
“1.14”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 71.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 71.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 17.1 m
- To
- 19.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:17.1-19.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval over a good width represents a highly material result, strongly confirming the presence of exceptional gold mineralization within the planned open pit area.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (71.12 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
- Strong grade-width product (142.24 g/t·m) exceeds the strong threshold (100 g/t·m) for gold.
Evidence · table
“71.12”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 71.12 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“71.12”
Context: 2.0
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 159.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 159.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 18.1 m
- To
- 18.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:18.1-18.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval represents an extremely high-grade zone, strongly confirming the presence of exceptional gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (159.09 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“159.09”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 159.09 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“159.09”
Context: 0.5
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 122.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 122.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 18.6 m
- To
- 19.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:18.6-19.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval represents an extremely high-grade zone, strongly confirming the presence of exceptional gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (122.74 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“122.74”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 122.74 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“122.74”
Context: 0.5
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:23-24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 30.4 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:30.4-31
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 2.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 50.7 m
- To
- 51.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:50.7-51.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while not exceptionally high-grade, contributes to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity within the project area.
Evidence · table
“2.69”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 53.4 m
- To
- 54 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:53.4-54
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept confirms strong gold mineralization, contributing positively to the project's resource potential and continuity.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (5.90 g/t Au) exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“5.90”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 5.90 g/t gold exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“5.90”
Context: 0.6
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 92.8 m
- To
- 94.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:92.8-94.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit moderate threshold (1 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“1.54”
Context: 1.6
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 102 m
- To
- 102.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:102-102.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 110 m
- To
- 112.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:110-112.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 2.1
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 114.8 m
- To
- 115.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:114.8-115.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit moderate threshold (1 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 153.2 m
- To
- 154.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:153.2-154.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 155.8 m
- To
- 157.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:155.8-157.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 165.6 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:165.6-166.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-400Goldboro · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-400
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 224.5 m
- To
- 225.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-400:224.5-225.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit moderate threshold (1 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 12.3 m
- To
- 13.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:12.3-13.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 114.9 m
- To
- 115.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:114.9-115.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 138.3 m
- To
- 139.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:138.3-139.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit moderate threshold (1 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 23.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 204.6 m
- To
- 205.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:204.6-205.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept highlights a very high-grade zone, strongly confirming the presence of significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold intercept (23.26 g/t Au) significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“23.26”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 23.26 g/t gold significantly exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“23.26”
Context: 0.5
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 7.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 221.7 m
- To
- 222.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:221.7-222.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept confirms strong gold mineralization, contributing positively to the project's resource potential and continuity.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept (7.92 g/t Au) exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“7.92”
Context: 0.6
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 7.92 g/t gold exceeds the open pit exceptional threshold of 5 g/t gold for orogenic deposits.
Evidence · table
“7.92”
Context: 0.6
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 3.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 245.9 m
- To
- 246.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:245.9-246.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while not exceptionally high-grade, contributes to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity within the project area.
Evidence · table
“3.17”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.2 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 264.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:260.5-264.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit weak threshold (0.3 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-401Goldboro · goldGrade: 2.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-401
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 260.5 m
- To
- 261 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-401:260.5-261
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, while not exceptionally high-grade, contributes to the overall understanding of mineralization continuity within the project area.
Evidence · table
“2.32”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
BR-23-403Goldboro · goldGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BR-23-403
- Project
- Goldboro
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_ns
- Reported Region
- canada_ns
- Ticker
- ANX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 58.9 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 58.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BR-23-403:58.9-60
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Eastern Analytical Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is above the open pit moderate threshold (1 g/t Au) but not significant in terms of grade or width.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release explicitly states that all samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples, and that Paul McNeill, P. Geo., a 'Qualified Person', reviewed and approved the news release.
Evidence · text
“All samples are collected using QA/QC protocols including the regular insertion of standards and blanks within the sample batch for analysis and check assays of select samples. All samples were submitted to Eastern Analytical Ltd. in Springdale, NL, for Au by fire assay (30 g) with an AA finish. This news release has been reviewed and approved by Paul McNeill, P. Geo., VP Exploration with Signal Gold Inc., a 'Qualified Person', under National Instrument 43-101 Standard for Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length,' indicating that precise true widths are not provided for individual intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intervals are reported as core length only. True widths are estimated to be between 70% and 100% of the core length.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: The drilling was conducted for geotechnical studies to demonstrate 'continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits' and to 'further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design'.
Evidence · text
“These drill holes, completed for geotechnical studies for pit slope and stability analysis, are also critical in demonstrating the continuity of mineralized zones within and near the planned open pits. This information will further inform continuing refinement and upgrades to the Goldboro Mineral Resource estimate and assist in the definition of open pit design, all initiatives which further de-risk the Goldboro Project.”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.