Silver Elephant Delivers Additional High-Grade Silver Concentrate Sale in April from Its Bolivian Silver Mining Operation
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Silver Elephant Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- ELEF
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Bolivia
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Production, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 19:31:27 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Silver Elephant Mining Corp. announced the sale of 31.6 tonnes of high-grade silver-lead concentrate (8,795 g/t Ag, 24% Pb) in April 2026. The company continues underground shrinkage stoping at the Apuradita operation in Bolivia and has identified potential open-pit targets.
Reasoning: The company successfully executed a concentrate sale and provided clear production guidance and metallurgical/QA/QC details, though the QP lacks independence.
Positive factors
- Successful sale of high-grade silver-lead concentrate
- Steady underground production targets maintained
- Identification of potential open-pit zones
- Robust QA/QC disclosure with ISO accredited laboratory
Negative factors
- Qualified Person is an employee and not independent
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes detailed QA/QC protocols, laboratory accreditation (ISO 17025), and sampling methods.
Evidence · text
“ALS Laboratories' sample management system meets all requirements of International Standards ISO/IEC 17025:2017”
Bonanza Interceptpositive · Story-specific tag
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Concentrate grade of 8,795 g/t Ag is exceptionally high.
Evidence · text
“grading 8,795 g/t Ag”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1Apuradita · silverGrade: 248Grade Unit: g/tNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Apuradita
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- bolivia
- Reported Region
- bolivia
- Ticker
- ELEF
Geometry
- Grade
- 248
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Feed grade for the processing campaign.
Evidence · text
“treated approximately 1,845 tonnes of Apuradita feed grading 248 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Apuradita · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Apuradita
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- bolivia
- Reported Region
- bolivia
- Ticker
- ELEF
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Feed grade for the April 2026 processing campaign.
Evidence · text
“0.8% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.