Silver Predator Revises Springer Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Silver Predator Corp.
Ticker
SPD
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Tungsten
Secondary commodities
Silver, Gold
Document categories
Resource update, Agreement transaction, Economic study
Extracted
2026-09-19 05:07:56 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Silver Predator Corp. has renegotiated its Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement for the Springer Tungsten Mine in Nevada, securing reduced royalty rates. The release also restates key metrics from a 2013 PEA, including a 47% post-tax IRR and existing tungsten resources.

Reasoning: The company has successfully renegotiated lease terms to improve project economics via lower royalties, while restating existing PEA metrics for the Springer Tungsten project.

Positive factors

  • Renegotiated agreement reduces royalty rates
  • Existing PEA shows strong IRR of 47%
  • Option to purchase property at defined price points

Negative factors

  • Project is historical/care and maintenance
  • Royalty obligations include significant cash and share components

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

agreement_transactionpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The primary focus is the renegotiation of a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement.

Evidence · text

“announces that on January 17, 2015 it has executed a renegotiated Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The document references a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) to support the project's economic context.

Evidence · text

“A PEA completed on current resources... indicates an IRR of 47%”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (2)

indicatedSpringer Tungsten Mine · tungstenTonnes: 355000Grade: 0.537Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 190635Contained Unit: stu's of wo 3Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Springer Tungsten Mine
Commodity
tungsten
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SPD

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:466fb3924d180b675f84

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
355000
Grade
0.537
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
190635
Contained Unit
stu's of wo 3

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2015-02-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of historical resource figures from a 2013 report.

Evidence · text

“355,000 Indicated tons at an average grade of 0.537% containing 190,635 STU's of WO 3”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSpringer Tungsten Mine · tungstenTonnes: 1933600Grade: 0.493Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 952326Contained Unit: stu's of wo 3Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Springer Tungsten Mine
Commodity
tungsten
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SPD

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:880d60fb773b191986f8

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1933600
Grade
0.493
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
952326
Contained Unit
stu's of wo 3

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2015-02-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Restatement of historical resource figures from a 2013 report.

Evidence · text

“1,933,600 Inferred tons at an average grade of 0.493% containing 952,326 STU's of WO 3”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.