Silver Range Advances East Goldfield in Nevada

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Silver Range Resources Ltd.
Ticker
SNG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-16 22:34:13 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Silver Range Resources Ltd. announced new gold drill results from shallow exploration at its East Goldfield Property in Nevada, with intercepts including 3.29 g/t Au over 1.00 meter. The program aimed to define near-surface gold mineralization in prospective structures. The company is also conducting geologic mapping and has commenced a 3D induced polarization and resistivity survey to identify deeper drill targets.

Reasoning: Silver Range Resources reported new, shallow exploration drill results from its East Goldfield property in Nevada, with several intercepts showing moderate to strong gold grades. The program successfully identified auriferous structures, and further exploration, including a geophysical survey, is underway to define deeper targets.

Positive factors

  • new drill results reported
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed off on technical information
  • further exploration planned (geophysics)

Negative factors

  • shallow drilling depths
  • true width of mineralization unknown
  • some low-grade intercepts

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 20

Classification and evidence

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'True widths of mineralization are unknown' for the reported drill intercepts.

Evidence · text

“True widths of mineralization are unknown.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details the sample collection, preparation, and assay methods, including chain of custody, fire assay, and ICP analysis by ALS Minerals, and is approved by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Core samples collected and reported by Silver Range herein were shipped under chain of custody to ALS Minerals facilities in Reno, Nevada for sample preparation and analysis. At the laboratory, samples were crushed progressively to < 2 mm (ALS Code CR-32) and a 1 kg aliquot was pulverized to 85% passing a 75 mm mesh (Code PUL-32). A 50 g subsample was then fire assayed with an atomic absorption finish (Code Au-AA26). In addition, induced coupled plasma analysis for 36 elements was performed on the samples (Code ME-ICP41).”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The exploration program tested auriferous ledges located between 1000 and 1100 m northwest of the previously defined Tom Keane Mine target, indicating an extension of known mineralization.

Evidence · text

“The two auriferous ledges tested in this program are between 1000 and 1100 m northwest of the Tom Keane Mine target for exploration.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: The document reports drill intercepts without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing the intervals.

Evidence · text

“Sample results are summarized below:”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 20. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (20)

EG22-01East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG22-01
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
0 m
To
2 m
Hole Depth
2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG22-01:0-2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488071
Northing
4172882
Azimuth
354 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG22-01East Goldfield · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG22-01
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
0 m
To
1.2 m
Hole Depth
2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG22-01:0-1.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488071
Northing
4172882
Azimuth
354 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG22-02East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG22-02
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.33 m
From
0 m
To
2.33 m
Hole Depth
2.23 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG22-02:0-2.33
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488071
Northing
4172880
Azimuth
354 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 2.33

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG22-03East Goldfield · goldGrade: 1.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.49 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG22-03
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
1.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.49 m
From
0 m
To
3.49 m
Hole Depth
3.49 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG22-03:0-3.49
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488071
Northing
4172878
Azimuth
176 °
Dip
-57 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with moderate gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“1.76”

Context: 3.49

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG22-03East Goldfield · goldGrade: 3.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG22-03
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
3.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
0 m
To
1 m
Hole Depth
3.49 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG22-03:0-1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488071
Northing
4172878
Azimuth
176 °
Dip
-57 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with strong gold grade from exploration drilling.

Positive factors

  • strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“3.29”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG22-04East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG22-04
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.29 m
From
0 m
To
2.29 m
Hole Depth
2.29 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG22-04:0-2.29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488071
Northing
4172877
Azimuth
354 °
Dip
-61 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 2.29

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG22-04East Goldfield · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG22-04
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
0 m
To
1.1 m
Hole Depth
2.29 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG22-04:0-1.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488071
Northing
4172877
Azimuth
354 °
Dip
-61 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 1.10

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG25-01East Goldfield · goldGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.58 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG25-01
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.58 m
From
0 m
To
1.58 m
Hole Depth
1.58 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG25-01:0-1.58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487496
Northing
4172405
Azimuth
194 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with moderate gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“1.98”

Context: 1.58

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG25-02East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG25-02
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.75 m
From
0 m
To
0.75 m
Hole Depth
0.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG25-02:0-0.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487505
Northing
4172407
Azimuth
183 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very shallow intercept with very weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • very weak gold grade
  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 0.75

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG25-03East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG25-03
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.36 m
From
0 m
To
1.36 m
Hole Depth
2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG25-03:0-1.36
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487512
Northing
4172404
Azimuth
167 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 1.36

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG25-04East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG25-04
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.14 m
From
0 m
To
4.14 m
Hole Depth
4.14 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG25-04:0-4.14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487514
Northing
4172404
Azimuth
167 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 4.14

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG25-04East Goldfield · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG25-04
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.54 m
From
3.6 m
To
4.14 m
Hole Depth
4.14 m
Intercept Depth
3.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG25-04:3.6-4.14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487514
Northing
4172404
Azimuth
167 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 0.54

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG25-05East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG25-05
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.38 m
From
0 m
To
1.38 m
Hole Depth
1.98 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG25-05:0-1.38
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488889
Northing
4171929
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with very weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • very weak gold grade
  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 1.38

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG25-06East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG25-06
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.05 m
From
0 m
To
1.05 m
Hole Depth
1.05 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG25-06:0-1.05
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488887
Northing
4171928
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 1.05

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG26-01East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG26-01
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
0 m
To
7.5 m
Hole Depth
7.46 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG26-01:0-7.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488884
Northing
4171932
Azimuth
212 °
Dip
-71 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with very weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • very weak gold grade
  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 7.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG26-02East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG26-02
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.05 m
From
0 m
To
5.05 m
Hole Depth
5.05 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG26-02:0-5.05
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
488894
Northing
4171926
Azimuth
207 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with very weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • very weak gold grade
  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 5.05

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG26-03East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG26-03
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.97 m
From
0 m
To
4.97 m
Hole Depth
11.22 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG26-03:0-4.97
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487634
Northing
4172404
Azimuth
192 °
Dip
-72 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 4.97

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG26-03East Goldfield · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG26-03
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.19 m
From
0 m
To
1.19 m
Hole Depth
11.22 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG26-03:0-1.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487634
Northing
4172404
Azimuth
192 °
Dip
-72 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“1.03”

Context: 1.19

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG26-04East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.76 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG26-04
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.76 m
From
0 m
To
2.76 m
Hole Depth
2.76 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG26-04:0-2.76
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487643
Northing
4172406
Azimuth
182 °
Dip
-72 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with very weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • very weak gold grade
  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 2.76

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

EG26-05East Goldfield · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
EG26-05
Project
East Goldfield
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
SNG

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.3 m
From
0 m
To
6.3 m
Hole Depth
6.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
EG26-05:0-6.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
487643
Northing
4172406
Azimuth
182 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
chain of custody, fire assay, ICP analysis

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Shallow intercept with very weak gold grade from exploration drilling.

Negative factors

  • very weak gold grade
  • shallow intercept
  • true width unknown

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 6.30

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.