Solstice Gold Expands Red Cedar Discovery with Multiple High-Grade Gold Intercepts and New Polymetallic Target at the Strathy Gold Project, Ontario
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Solstice Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- SGC
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Zinc, Lead
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-14 22:42:34 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Solstice Gold has reported significant drill results from its winter-spring campaign at the Strathy Gold Project in Ontario, including multiple high-grade gold intercepts at the Red Cedar Discovery. Highlights include 59.4 g/t Au over 0.5m and 25.1 g/t Au over 0.6m. The program also discovered a new polymetallic gold-silver-base metal target in hole SGPDH26-07, which intersected 3.09 g/t Au, 20.80 g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb over 3.83m, resembling the nearby Leckie Gold Zone. These results confirm broad, shallow gold mineralization and indicate a large-scale hydrothermal gold system, with follow-up exploration planned.
Reasoning: The drill program yielded several bonanza-grade gold intercepts and identified a new polymetallic target, significantly expanding the known mineralization and potential of the Strathy Gold Project. The results confirm a broad, shallow gold system with visible gold, indicating high exploration upside, despite the narrow widths of some intercepts and lack of true width disclosure.
Positive factors
- Multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, expand the Red Cedar Discovery.
- Discovery of a new polymetallic gold-silver-base metal target (Leckie-style mineralization) adds significant exploration potential.
- Broad gold mineralization confirmed at shallow depths, indicating a potentially large system.
- Presence of visible gold in several intercepts is a strong indicator of high-grade potential.
- Rigorous QA/QC procedures and certified laboratory ensure data reliability.
Negative factors
- Many intercepts are narrow, and true widths are not disclosed, which may overstate apparent thickness.
- Lack of explicit cut-off grade disclosure for reported intervals.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 26
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release explicitly mentions rigorous sampling and analytical protocols, certified reference materials, blank and duplicate samples, and an independent, ISO-certified laboratory (Activation Laboratories).
Evidence · text
“The Company follows rigorous sampling and analytical protocols that meet or exceed industry standards. Sample batches include certified reference materials, blank and duplicate samples that are processed under the control of Activation Laboratories (“ActLabs”), an independent laboratory located in Ancaster, ON. The quality control system used by ActLabs meets all requirements of International Standards ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and ISO 9001:2015. Certified reference materials, blanks and quarter-sawn core duplicates are routinely inserted into the sample stream with control samples comprising a minimum of 10% of all samples to monitor accuracy and precision.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: The document does not state the cut-off grade used for reporting the drill intervals.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are core lengths.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drill program is expanding the Red Cedar Discovery and testing new areas, including a newly discovered polymetallic occurrence, extending mineralization beyond previously known limits.
Evidence · text
“Solstice Gold Expands Red Cedar Discovery with Multiple High-Grade Gold Intercepts and New Polymetallic Target”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 26. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (26)
SGPDH26-04Strathy · goldGrade: 59.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-04
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 59.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 111.78 m
- To
- 112.28 m
- Hole Depth
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.39 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-04:111.78-112.28
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592485
- Northing
- 5215945
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptionally high gold grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization and contributing significantly to the expansion of the Red Cedar Discovery, despite its narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (59.4 g/t Au) indicates bonanza-grade mineralization.
- Visible gold noted in the intercept, confirming high-grade potential.
- Part of a new drill campaign expanding the Red Cedar Discovery.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“59.4*”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 59.4 g/t over 0.5m is exceptionally high, well above the typical threshold for bonanza grades in gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“59.4*”
Context: 0.50
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.5m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 111.78
SGPDH26-04Strathy · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-04
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 124.62 m
- To
- 125.12 m
- Hole Depth
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.39 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-04:124.62-125.12
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592485
- Northing
- 5215945
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization but is of moderate grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m) and lack of true width disclosure.
- Grade is moderate for gold.
Evidence · table
“1.34”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.5m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 124.62
SGPDH26-04Strathy · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-04
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 67.39 m
- To
- 68.19 m
- Hole Depth
- 273 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.39 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-04:67.39-68.19
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592485
- Northing
- 5215945
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization at shallow depths but is of moderate grade and narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization at shallow depths in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.8m) and lack of true width disclosure.
- Grade is moderate for gold.
Evidence · table
“1.24”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.8m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 67.39
SGPDH26-11Strathy · goldGrade: 25.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-11
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 8.1 m
- To
- 8.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-11:8.1-8.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592404
- Northing
- 5215970
- Azimuth
- 315 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very high gold grade at shallow depth, indicating significant high-grade potential for the Red Cedar Discovery, despite its narrow width.
Positive factors
- Very high gold grade (25.1 g/t Au) indicates significant mineralization.
- Visible gold noted in the intercept, confirming high-grade potential.
- Intercept at shallow depth (8.1m) is favorable for potential development.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.6m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“25.1”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 25.1 g/t over 0.6m is exceptionally high, well above the typical threshold for bonanza grades in gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“25.1”
Context: 0.60
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.6m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 8.10
SGPDH26-11Strathy · goldGrade: 8.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-11
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 229.85 m
- To
- 230.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-11:229.85-230.25
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592404
- Northing
- 5215970
- Azimuth
- 315 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a high gold grade, contributing to the high-grade potential of the Red Cedar Discovery, though its very narrow width limits its individual materiality.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (8.37 g/t Au) indicates significant mineralization.
- Visible gold noted in the intercept, confirming high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.4m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“8.37”
Context: 0.40
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 8.37 g/t over 0.4m is exceptionally high, well above the typical threshold for bonanza grades in gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“8.37”
Context: 0.40
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.4m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 229.85
SGPDH26-07Strathy · goldGrade: 3.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-07
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 163.09 m
- To
- 166.92 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.09 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-07:163.09-166.92
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592421
- Northing
- 5215920
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept represents a significant discovery of a new polymetallic target with good gold grades over a moderate width, opening up new exploration potential for 'Leckie-style' mineralization.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (3.09 g/t Au) over a moderate width (3.83m).
- Discovery of a new polymetallic target, indicating a new style of mineralization.
- Resembles 'Leckie-style' mineralization, suggesting potential for a larger system.
Negative factors
- Lack of true width disclosure.
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“3.09*”
Context: 3.83
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (3.83m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“3.83”
Context: 163.09
Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Reason: Metal equivalent grade (3.60 g/t AuEq) is reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used in its calculation.
Evidence · table
“3.60 g/t AuEq”
Context: Interval contains 20.80g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb 3.60 g/t AuEq over 3.83m
SGPDH26-07Strathy · silverGrade: 20.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-07
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 163.09 m
- To
- 166.92 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.09 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-07:163.09-166.92
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592421
- Northing
- 5215920
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade, as part of the new polymetallic discovery, adds value and indicates a broader mineralization style, enhancing the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Silver grade (20.80 g/t Ag) contributes to the polymetallic nature of the new discovery.
- Part of a new polymetallic target, adding to the project's overall potential.
Negative factors
- Lack of true width disclosure.
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“20.80g/t Ag”
Context: Interval contains 20.80g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb 3.60 g/t AuEq over 3.83m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (3.83m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“3.83”
Context: 163.09
Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Reason: Metal equivalent grade (3.60 g/t AuEq) is reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used in its calculation.
Evidence · table
“3.60 g/t AuEq”
Context: Interval contains 20.80g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb 3.60 g/t AuEq over 3.83m
SGPDH26-07Strathy · zincGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-07
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 163.09 m
- To
- 166.92 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.09 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-07:163.09-166.92
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592421
- Northing
- 5215920
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade, as part of the new polymetallic discovery, adds value and indicates a broader mineralization style, enhancing the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Zinc grade (0.88% Zn) contributes to the polymetallic nature of the new discovery.
- Part of a new polymetallic target, adding to the project's overall potential.
Negative factors
- Lack of true width disclosure.
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.88% Zn”
Context: Interval contains 20.80g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb 3.60 g/t AuEq over 3.83m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (3.83m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“3.83”
Context: 163.09
Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Reason: Metal equivalent grade (3.60 g/t AuEq) is reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used in its calculation.
Evidence · table
“3.60 g/t AuEq”
Context: Interval contains 20.80g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb 3.60 g/t AuEq over 3.83m
SGPDH26-07Strathy · leadGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-07
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.83 m
- From
- 163.09 m
- To
- 166.92 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.09 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-07:163.09-166.92
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592421
- Northing
- 5215920
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade, as part of the new polymetallic discovery, adds value and indicates a broader mineralization style, enhancing the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Lead grade (0.27% Pb) contributes to the polymetallic nature of the new discovery.
- Part of a new polymetallic target, adding to the project's overall potential.
Negative factors
- Lack of true width disclosure.
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“0.27% Pb”
Context: Interval contains 20.80g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb 3.60 g/t AuEq over 3.83m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (3.83m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“3.83”
Context: 163.09
Metal Equivalent OpaqueRejected · negative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Reason: Metal equivalent grade (3.60 g/t AuEq) is reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used in its calculation.
Evidence · table
“3.60 g/t AuEq”
Context: Interval contains 20.80g/t Ag, 0.88% Zn, and 0.27% Pb 3.60 g/t AuEq over 3.83m
SGPDH26-07Strathy · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-07
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.28 m
- From
- 168.6 m
- To
- 171.88 m
- Hole Depth
- 234 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.09 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-07:168.6-171.88
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592421
- Northing
- 5215920
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the area but not a highlight on its own.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the area of the new polymetallic discovery.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.41 g/t Au).
- Lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 3.28
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (3.28m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“3.28”
Context: 168.60
SGPDH26-01Strathy · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.59 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-01
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.59 m
- From
- 3.84 m
- To
- 4.43 m
- Hole Depth
- 223.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.84 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-01:3.84-4.43
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592388
- Northing
- 5215955
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -82 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms moderate gold mineralization at very shallow depth, contributing to the overall understanding of the Red Cedar Discovery.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization at very shallow depth.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.59m) and lack of true width disclosure.
- Grade is moderate for gold.
Evidence · table
“1.04”
Context: 0.59
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.59m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 3.84
SGPDH26-02Strathy · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-02
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.68 m
- From
- 129.88 m
- To
- 131.56 m
- Hole Depth
- 259 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.88 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-02:129.88-131.56
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592212
- Northing
- 5216003
- Azimuth
- 354 °
- Dip
- -82 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.60 g/t Au).
- Lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 1.68
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (1.68m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“1.68”
Context: 129.88
SGPDH26-03Strathy · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-03
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 44.44 m
- To
- 44.94 m
- Hole Depth
- 183 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.44 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-03:44.44-44.94
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592411
- Northing
- 5215947
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization at shallow depth, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization at shallow depth.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.38 g/t Au).
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.5m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 44.44
SGPDH26-05Strathy · goldGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-05
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 18.45 m
- To
- 18.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 195 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.45 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-05:18.45-18.95
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592485
- Northing
- 5215945
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms moderate gold mineralization at shallow depth, contributing to the overall understanding of the Red Cedar Discovery.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization at shallow depth.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m) and lack of true width disclosure.
- Grade is moderate for gold.
Evidence · table
“1.57”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.5m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 18.45
SGPDH26-05Strathy · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-05
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 95.55 m
- To
- 96 m
- Hole Depth
- 195 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.45 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-05:95.55-96
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592485
- Northing
- 5215945
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms moderate gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the Red Cedar Discovery.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.45m) and lack of true width disclosure.
- Grade is moderate for gold.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 0.45
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.45m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 95.55
SGPDH26-06Strathy · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-06
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 94.29 m
- To
- 94.79 m
- Hole Depth
- 117 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.29 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-06:94.29-94.79
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 591826
- Northing
- 5216480
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.85 g/t Au).
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.5m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 94.29
SGPDH26-08Strathy · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-08
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 22.1 m
- To
- 23.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 174 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-08:22.1-23.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592058
- Northing
- 5215988
- Azimuth
- 60.1 °
- Dip
- -77.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows very low-grade gold mineralization, which is not material on its own.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.16 g/t Au).
- Lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (1.0m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 22.10
SGPDH26-09Strathy · goldGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-09
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 166.2 m
- To
- 166.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 285 m
- Intercept Depth
- 166.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-09:166.2-166.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592418
- Northing
- 5215920
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a high gold grade, contributing to the high-grade potential of the Red Cedar Discovery, though its narrow width limits its individual materiality.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (3.2 g/t Au) indicates significant mineralization.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (0.5m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.5m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 166.20
SGPDH26-10Strathy · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-10
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.18 m
- From
- 11.82 m
- To
- 13 m
- Hole Depth
- 162 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.82 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-10:11.82-13
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592404
- Northing
- 5215970
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization at shallow depth, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization at shallow depth.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.56 g/t Au).
- Lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 1.18
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (1.18m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 11.82
SGPDH26-12Strathy · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-12
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 145.8 m
- To
- 146.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 258 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-12:145.8-146.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592416
- Northing
- 5216085
- Azimuth
- 174 °
- Dip
- -82 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.59 g/t Au).
- Narrow intercept length (0.7m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.7m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 145.80
SGPDH26-12Strathy · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-12
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 182.6 m
- To
- 183.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 258 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-12:182.6-183.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592416
- Northing
- 5216085
- Azimuth
- 174 °
- Dip
- -82 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.56 g/t Au).
- Narrow intercept length (0.8m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.8m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 182.60
SGPDH26-13Strathy · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-13
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 98.6 m
- To
- 99.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 213 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-13:98.6-99.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592485
- Northing
- 5216154
- Azimuth
- 335 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms moderate gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the Red Cedar Discovery.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (1.2m) and lack of true width disclosure.
- Grade is moderate for gold.
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: 1.20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (1.2m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“1.20”
Context: 98.60
SGPDH26-14Strathy · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH26-14
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 96.9 m
- To
- 97.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 264 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SGPDH26-14:96.9-97.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 592141
- Northing
- 5215849
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralization in the Red Cedar Discovery area.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.52 g/t Au).
- Narrow intercept length (0.6m) and lack of true width disclosure.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (0.6m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 96.90
SGPDH25-09Strathy · goldGrade: 28.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SGPDH25-09
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very high gold grade, indicating significant high-grade potential for the Red Cedar Discovery, despite its narrow width and lack of depth information in the highlight.
Positive factors
- Very high gold grade (28.70 g/t Au) indicates significant mineralization.
- Part of a new drill campaign expanding the Red Cedar Discovery.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (1.0m) and lack of true width disclosure.
- No depth information provided in the highlight.
Evidence · text
“28.70 g/t Au over 1.0m (SGPDH25-09)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The gold grade of 28.70 g/t over 1.0m is exceptionally high, well above the typical threshold for bonanza grades in gold deposits.
Evidence · text
“28.70 g/t Au over 1.0m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width (1.0m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · text
“1.0m”
Historical Leckie Gold ZoneStrathy · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Historical Leckie Gold Zone
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.28 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows significant gold mineralization over a good width, providing important context for the project's potential, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (5.00 g/t Au) over a significant width (17.28m) from historical data.
- Provides context for the newly discovered 'Leckie-style' mineralization.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not independently verified by Solstice.
- No independent QA/QC protocols known for these historic samples.
Evidence · text
“5.00 g/t Au over 17.28 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is historical data re-announced to provide context for new results, with no new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“5.00 g/t Au over 17.28 m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as core length (17.28m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · text
“17.28 m”
Historical Leckie Gold ZoneStrathy · goldGrade: 7.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Historical Leckie Gold Zone
- Project
- Strathy
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- SGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Activation Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows significant gold mineralization over a good width, providing important context for the project's potential, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (7.66 g/t Au) over a good width (7.25m) from historical data.
- Provides context for the newly discovered 'Leckie-style' mineralization.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not independently verified by Solstice.
- No independent QA/QC protocols known for these historic samples.
Evidence · text
“7.66 g/t Au over 7.25 m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "(TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company’s winter-spring drill camp"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is historical data re-announced to provide context for new results, with no new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“7.66 g/t Au over 7.25 m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as core length (7.25m) with no true width or drill orientation provided, meaning the apparent width may overstate the true thickness.
Evidence · text
“7.25 m”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.