Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazon Mine

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Southern Silver Exploration Corp.
Ticker
SSV
Exchange
TSX
Region
southeast Durango, Mexico
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-18 22:26:22 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Southern Silver Exploration Corp. reports high-grade polymetallic channel sampling results from the Puro Corazon Mine on its Cerro Las Minitas property in Mexico. Highlights include 2.8 metres at 665 g/t AgEq and 1.2 metres at 2042 g/t AgEq, demonstrating significant silver, lead, and zinc mineralization. The company plans to incorporate these results into an updated Mineral Resource Estimate and Preliminary Economic Assessment for the project.

Reasoning: The document reports high-grade polymetallic channel sampling results from an active underground mine, including bonanza silver equivalent grades. The results are supported by disclosed QA/QC and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating strong potential for resource enhancement and mine planning. However, the channel sampling context and pending drill assays introduce some limitations.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including bonanza grades, from underground channel sampling.
  • Polymetallic mineralization with significant lead and zinc grades.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Negative factors

  • Channel sampling may not reflect true thickness or grades of historically mined material due to inaccessible wider stopes.
  • Assays for recently completed core drilling are pending, limiting the current scope of new drill results.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 66

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 66. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (66)

Fact 1Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 120Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
120
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
226:2.2

Location

Location
5 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
247
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“120”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 2Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
226:2.2

Location

Location
5 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
247
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 3Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
226:2.2

Location

Location
5 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
247
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 4Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
226:2.2

Location

Location
5 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
247
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“3.4”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 5Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
226:2.2

Location

Location
5 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
247
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 6Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
66
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
234:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
309
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good silver equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“66”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 7Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
234:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
309
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 8Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
234:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
309
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade is low in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 9Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
234:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
309
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good lead grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“2.6”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 10Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
234:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
309
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong zinc grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“7.0”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 11Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 276Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
276
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
229:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
615
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“276”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 12Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
229:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
615
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 13Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
229:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
615
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good copper grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 14Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
229:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
615
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong lead grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“11.3”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 15Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
3.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
229:1.0

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
615
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good zinc grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 16Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 205Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
205
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
228:0.7

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
657
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“205”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 17Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
228:0.7

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
657
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 18Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
228:0.7

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
657
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good copper grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 19Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
6.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
228:0.7

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
657
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong lead grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“6.6”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 20Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 10.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
10.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
228:0.7

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
657
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong zinc grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“10.2”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 21Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 298Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
298
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
93:2.4

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
383
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“298”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 22Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
93:2.4

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
383
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 23Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
93:2.4

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
383
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good copper grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 24Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
93:2.4

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
383
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 25Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
93:2.4

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
383
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 26Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
28
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
87:3.5

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“28”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 27Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
87:3.5

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 28Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
87:3.5

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate copper grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 29Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
87:3.5

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.3”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 30Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
87:3.5

Location

Location
6 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
157
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“3.8”

Context: 3.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 31Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 127Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
127
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
239:3.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
342
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“127”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 32Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
239:3.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
342
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 33Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
239:3.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
342
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good copper grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.7”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 34Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
239:3.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
342
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“3.8”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 35Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
3.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
239:3.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
342
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 36Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 109Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
109
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
86:2.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
221
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“109”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 37Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
86:2.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
221
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 38Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
86:2.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
221
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 39Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
2.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
86:2.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
221
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“2.9”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 40Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
86:2.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
221
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 2.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 41Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 289Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
289
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
85:2.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
665
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“289”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 42Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
85:2.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
665
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is low in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 43Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
85:2.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
665
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate copper grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 44Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
9.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
85:2.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
665
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“9.6”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 45Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
6.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
85:2.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
665
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“6.6”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 46Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 198Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
198
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
84:4.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
367
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“198”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 47Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
84:4.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
367
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 48Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
84:4.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
367
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 49Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
84:4.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
367
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“6.0”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 50Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
84:4.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
367
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 51Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 211Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
211
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
:3.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
391
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“211”

Context: 3.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 52Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
:3.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
391
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 3.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 53Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
:3.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
391
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 3.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 54Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 6.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
6.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
:3.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
391
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“6.4”

Context: 3.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 55Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
:3.7

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
391
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good zinc grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: 3.7

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 56Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
89
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
83:4.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
141
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“89”

Context: 4.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 57Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
83:4.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
141
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 4.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 58Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
83:4.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
141
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper grade is low in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 4.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 59Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
83:4.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
141
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a moderate lead grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: 4.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 60Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
83:4.8

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
141
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 4.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 61Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 263Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
263
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
82:1.1

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
455
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“263”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 62Cerro Las Minitas · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
82:1.1

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
455
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is negligible in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.0”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 63Cerro Las Minitas · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
copper
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
82:1.1

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
455
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good copper grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good copper grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 64Cerro Las Minitas · leadGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
7.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
82:1.1

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
455
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a strong lead grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Strong lead grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“7.4”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 65Cerro Las Minitas · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
82:1.1

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
455
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc grade is low in this intercept, but it is part of a polymetallic system. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

Fact 66Cerro Las Minitas · silverGrade: 193Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Las Minitas
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
mexico
Ticker
SSV

Geometry

Grade
193
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
81:2.0

Location

Location
7 GRINGO
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, check assays

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
353
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
80
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This channel sample shows a good silver equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the understanding of mineralization at the project. Metal equivalent assumptions and QA/QC are transparent.

Positive factors

  • Good silver equivalent grade for channel sample.
  • True width is estimated for reported intervals.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including lab accreditation and QP sign-off.
  • Clear disclosure of metal equivalent calculation assumptions (prices and recoveries).

Evidence · table

“193”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as estimated true thickness unless otherwise indicated”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions analysis by ALS Laboratories, overlimit assays, and re-assays, indicating QA/QC procedures.

Evidence · text

“Analyzed by FA/AA for gold and ICP-AES by ALS Laboratories, North Vancouver, BC. Silver (>100ppm), copper, lead and zinc (>1%) overlimits assayed by ore grade ICP analysis, 2) High silver overlimits (>1500g/t Ag) and gold overlimits (>10g/t Au) re-assayed with FA-Grav. High Pb (>20%) and Zn (>30%) overlimits assayed by titration.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.

Evidence · text

“Composites are calculated using a 80g/t AgEq cut-off in sulphide and 0.5g/t AuEq in the oxide gold zone. Composites have <20% internal dilution, except where noted; anomalous intercepts are calculated using a 10g/t AgEq cut-off.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Southern Silver Reports 2.8m of 665g/t AgEq and 4.0m of 367g/t AgEq from Underground Channel Sampling at the Puro Corazo"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.