SRQ Resources Reports Assay Results from Phase 3 Drilling on Lac Brulé

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
SRQ Resources Inc.
Ticker
SRQ
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Nickel, Cobalt, Sulfur, Iron ore, Magnesium oxide
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-19 01:57:48 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

SRQ Resources reported assay results from its Phase 3 drilling program at the Lac Brulé project in Quebec, highlighting significant copper and nickel mineralization. Key intercepts include 36.84m at 0.85% CuEq in LB-24-23 and 11.59m at 1.0% CuEq in LB-24-26. The program also extended mineralization 6 km west of the main Gossan Zone, indicating a large magmatic intrusive complex with strong exploration potential.

Reasoning: SRQ Resources reported strong polymetallic drill results from its Lac Brulé project, including high-grade copper and nickel intercepts over significant widths. The program also expanded the known mineralization footprint and identified new targets, demonstrating substantial exploration upside. While QA/QC is disclosed, the lack of true width information and explicit metal prices for the equivalent calculation are minor drawbacks.

Positive factors

  • High-grade polymetallic intercepts, particularly for nickel and copper, with several exceeding strong thresholds for both metals.
  • Discovery of additional magmatic pyroxenite units and confirmation of a large magmatic intrusive complex, indicating significant exploration potential.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including the use of an accredited laboratory and QP sign-off, enhancing data credibility.
  • The drill program successfully tested a high-gravity target 6 km from the main zone, indicating district-scale potential.

Negative factors

  • True width is not disclosed for any of the reported intercepts, which may overstate the actual thickness of mineralization.
  • The metal equivalent formula is provided, but specific price assumptions for copper and nickel are not explicitly stated, only their relative factors.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 474

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that 'Sample preparation and analysis are carried out by Activation Laboratories Ltd (Actlab)' and 'The technical information in this release has been reviewed and approved by Dr. Marc-Antoine Audet, Ph.D., P.Geo and President and CEO of SRQ Resources, and a ‘Qualified Person’'.

Evidence · text

“Sample preparation and analysis are carried out by Activation Laboratories Ltd (Actlab), Ancaster and Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. All samples were assayed for Ni, Cu, Co, Fe, S, Pt, Pd and Au using sodium peroxide fusion ICP for the first five elements and by fire assay ICPOES for the last three. The technical information in this release has been reviewed and approved by Dr. Marc-Antoine Audet, Ph.D., P. Geo and President and CEO of SRQ Resources, and a ‘Qualified Person’, as defined by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The reported drill intercepts are given as 'core lengths' and 'LENGTH m' without any mention of true width or drill orientation relative to mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Highlights (in core lengths)”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: The metal equivalent formula is provided, but the specific price assumptions for copper and nickel are not explicitly stated, only their relative factors.

Evidence · text

“Cueq: ((Cu%*4.50) + (Ni%*8.5)) /4.50”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Hole LB-24-29 (Target 900) was drilled 6 kilometers west of the Gossan Zone, indicating an extension of exploration beyond the main area.

Evidence · text

“one hole (LB-24-29; Target 900) drilled 6 kilometers ("km") west of the Gossan Zone testing a high gravity target.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 474. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (474)

LB-24-19Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-19
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
118.35 m
To
119.25 m
Intercept Depth
118.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-19:118.35-119.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-19Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-19
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
118.35 m
To
119.25 m
Intercept Depth
118.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-19:118.35-119.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-19Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-19
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
118.35 m
To
119.25 m
Intercept Depth
118.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-19:118.35-119.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-19Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-19
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
118.35 m
To
119.25 m
Intercept Depth
118.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-19:118.35-119.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-19Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-19
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.69
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
118.35 m
To
119.25 m
Intercept Depth
118.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-19:118.35-119.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“6.69”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-19Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-19
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
118.35 m
To
119.25 m
Intercept Depth
118.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-19:118.35-119.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“15.80”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-19Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 17.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-19
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
118.35 m
To
119.25 m
Intercept Depth
118.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-19:118.35-119.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“17.58”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-20Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-20
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
108 m
To
110.6 m
Intercept Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-20:108-110.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 2.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-20Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-20
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
108 m
To
110.6 m
Intercept Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-20:108-110.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 2.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-20Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-20
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
108 m
To
110.6 m
Intercept Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-20:108-110.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 2.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-20Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-20
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
108 m
To
110.6 m
Intercept Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-20:108-110.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 2.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-20Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 4.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-20
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
108 m
To
110.6 m
Intercept Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-20:108-110.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“4.93”

Context: 2.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-20Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-20
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
108 m
To
110.6 m
Intercept Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-20:108-110.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.59
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“14.04”

Context: 2.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-20Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 18.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-20
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
108 m
To
110.6 m
Intercept Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-20:108-110.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“18.34”

Context: 2.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m
From
84.65 m
To
84.98 m
Intercept Depth
84.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:84.65-84.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 0.33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m
From
84.65 m
To
84.98 m
Intercept Depth
84.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:84.65-84.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 0.33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m
From
84.65 m
To
84.98 m
Intercept Depth
84.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:84.65-84.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 0.33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m
From
84.65 m
To
84.98 m
Intercept Depth
84.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:84.65-84.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 0.33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m
From
84.65 m
To
84.98 m
Intercept Depth
84.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:84.65-84.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“8.50”

Context: 0.33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m
From
84.65 m
To
84.98 m
Intercept Depth
84.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:84.65-84.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“18.40”

Context: 0.33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 16.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m
From
84.65 m
To
84.98 m
Intercept Depth
84.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:84.65-84.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“16.75”

Context: 0.33

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
111.5 m
Intercept Depth
106.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:106.8-111.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
111.5 m
Intercept Depth
106.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:106.8-111.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a moderate interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
111.5 m
Intercept Depth
106.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:106.8-111.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a moderate interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
111.5 m
Intercept Depth
106.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:106.8-111.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
111.5 m
Intercept Depth
106.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:106.8-111.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“6.42”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 16.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
111.5 m
Intercept Depth
106.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:106.8-111.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“16.96”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 17.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.95
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
106.8 m
To
111.5 m
Intercept Depth
106.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:106.8-111.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“17.95”

Context: 4.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.15 m
From
113.55 m
To
118.7 m
Intercept Depth
113.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:113.55-118.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 5.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.15 m
From
113.55 m
To
118.7 m
Intercept Depth
113.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:113.55-118.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a moderate interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 5.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.15 m
From
113.55 m
To
118.7 m
Intercept Depth
113.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:113.55-118.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a moderate interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 5.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.15 m
From
113.55 m
To
118.7 m
Intercept Depth
113.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:113.55-118.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 5.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.15 m
From
113.55 m
To
118.7 m
Intercept Depth
113.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:113.55-118.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“7.22”

Context: 5.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.15 m
From
113.55 m
To
118.7 m
Intercept Depth
113.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:113.55-118.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“18.36”

Context: 5.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 21.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
21.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.15 m
From
113.55 m
To
118.7 m
Intercept Depth
113.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:113.55-118.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“21.17”

Context: 5.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
120.3 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:120.3-121.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
120.3 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:120.3-121.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
120.3 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:120.3-121.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
120.3 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:120.3-121.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
120.3 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:120.3-121.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“6.86”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
120.3 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:120.3-121.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“16.00”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 17.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
120.3 m
To
121.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:120.3-121.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“17.41”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.95
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This combined intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating substantial mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 10.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.95
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a significant interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 10.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.95
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a significant interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 10.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.95
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 10.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.89
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.95
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“6.89”

Context: 10.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.95
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“17.59”

Context: 10.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-21Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 19.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-21
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-21:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“19.38”

Context: 10.98

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.38 m
From
145.62 m
To
149 m
Intercept Depth
145.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:145.62-149
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 3.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.38 m
From
145.62 m
To
149 m
Intercept Depth
145.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:145.62-149
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 3.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.38 m
From
145.62 m
To
149 m
Intercept Depth
145.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:145.62-149
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 3.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.38 m
From
145.62 m
To
149 m
Intercept Depth
145.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:145.62-149
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 3.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.38 m
From
145.62 m
To
149 m
Intercept Depth
145.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:145.62-149
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“5.66”

Context: 3.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.38 m
From
145.62 m
To
149 m
Intercept Depth
145.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:145.62-149
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“15.16”

Context: 3.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 16.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.38 m
From
145.62 m
To
149 m
Intercept Depth
145.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:145.62-149
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“16.44”

Context: 3.38

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m
From
149.6 m
To
150.55 m
Intercept Depth
149.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:149.6-150.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m
From
149.6 m
To
150.55 m
Intercept Depth
149.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:149.6-150.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m
From
149.6 m
To
150.55 m
Intercept Depth
149.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:149.6-150.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m
From
149.6 m
To
150.55 m
Intercept Depth
149.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:149.6-150.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 3.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
3.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m
From
149.6 m
To
150.55 m
Intercept Depth
149.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:149.6-150.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“3.73”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 11.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
11.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m
From
149.6 m
To
150.55 m
Intercept Depth
149.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:149.6-150.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“11.90”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 17.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.91
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m
From
149.6 m
To
150.55 m
Intercept Depth
149.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:149.6-150.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“17.91”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m
From
151.55 m
To
152.46 m
Intercept Depth
151.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:151.55-152.46
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m
From
151.55 m
To
152.46 m
Intercept Depth
151.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:151.55-152.46
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m
From
151.55 m
To
152.46 m
Intercept Depth
151.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:151.55-152.46
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m
From
151.55 m
To
152.46 m
Intercept Depth
151.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:151.55-152.46
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.87
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m
From
151.55 m
To
152.46 m
Intercept Depth
151.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:151.55-152.46
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“5.87”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 16.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m
From
151.55 m
To
152.46 m
Intercept Depth
151.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:151.55-152.46
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“16.40”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 17.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.91 m
From
151.55 m
To
152.46 m
Intercept Depth
151.55 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:151.55-152.46
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“17.11”

Context: 0.91

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
154.1 m
To
155 m
Intercept Depth
154.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:154.1-155
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
154.1 m
To
155 m
Intercept Depth
154.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:154.1-155
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
154.1 m
To
155 m
Intercept Depth
154.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:154.1-155
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
154.1 m
To
155 m
Intercept Depth
154.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:154.1-155
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
154.1 m
To
155 m
Intercept Depth
154.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:154.1-155
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“5.86”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 16.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
154.1 m
To
155 m
Intercept Depth
154.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:154.1-155
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“16.10”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 20.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
154.1 m
To
155 m
Intercept Depth
154.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:154.1-155
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“20.73”

Context: 0.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.32 m
From
156.52 m
To
156.84 m
Intercept Depth
156.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:156.52-156.84
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.32 m
From
156.52 m
To
156.84 m
Intercept Depth
156.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:156.52-156.84
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.32 m
From
156.52 m
To
156.84 m
Intercept Depth
156.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:156.52-156.84
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.32 m
From
156.52 m
To
156.84 m
Intercept Depth
156.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:156.52-156.84
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.32 m
From
156.52 m
To
156.84 m
Intercept Depth
156.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:156.52-156.84
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“8.77”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.83
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.32 m
From
156.52 m
To
156.84 m
Intercept Depth
156.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:156.52-156.84
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“19.83”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 14.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.32 m
From
156.52 m
To
156.84 m
Intercept Depth
156.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:156.52-156.84
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“14.64”

Context: 0.32

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.46 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This combined intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 6.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.46 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a moderate interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 6.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.46 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a moderate interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 6.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.46 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 6.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.46 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“5.59”

Context: 6.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.46 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“15.22”

Context: 6.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-22Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 17.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-22
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.46 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-22:Combined
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“17.26”

Context: 6.46

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.3 m
From
126.66 m
To
133.96 m
Intercept Depth
126.66 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:126.66-133.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating substantial mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.3 m
From
126.66 m
To
133.96 m
Intercept Depth
126.66 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:126.66-133.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is moderate over a significant interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.3 m
From
126.66 m
To
133.96 m
Intercept Depth
126.66 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:126.66-133.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a significant interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.3 m
From
126.66 m
To
133.96 m
Intercept Depth
126.66 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:126.66-133.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.3 m
From
126.66 m
To
133.96 m
Intercept Depth
126.66 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:126.66-133.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“5.76”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.3 m
From
126.66 m
To
133.96 m
Intercept Depth
126.66 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:126.66-133.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.98
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“15.15”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 16.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.3 m
From
126.66 m
To
133.96 m
Intercept Depth
126.66 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:126.66-133.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“16.93”

Context: 7.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included intercept shows exceptional copper equivalent grade over a very narrow width, indicating very high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is strong over a very narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This cobalt grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 14.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“14.90”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 25.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
25.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“25.80”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 15.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“15.11”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This cobalt grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 9.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
9.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“9.94”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“20.10”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 15.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.55
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.27 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“15.55”

Context: 0.27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.13 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included intercept shows exceptional copper equivalent grade over a very narrow width, indicating very high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: 0.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.13 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 0.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.13 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 0.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.13 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This cobalt grade is moderate over a very narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 0.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.13 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“15.60”

Context: 0.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 26.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
26.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.13 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“26.70”

Context: 0.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 16.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.13 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“16.75”

Context: 0.13

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.81 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.04
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 0.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.81 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.04
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 0.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.81 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.04
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 0.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.81 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.04
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 0.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.81 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.04
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“5.96”

Context: 0.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.81 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.04
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“16.30”

Context: 0.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 18.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.81 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“18.41”

Context: 0.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
2.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.72 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included intercept shows exceptional copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating very high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“2.45”

Context: 0.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.72 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is strong over a narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.62”

Context: 0.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.72 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 0.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.72 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This cobalt grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 0.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 9.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
9.65
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.72 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“9.65”

Context: 0.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.72 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“19.70”

Context: 0.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 18.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.72 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“18.74”

Context: 0.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is strong over a narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This cobalt grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“7.63”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 16.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“16.20”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 18.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:Includes
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“18.24”

Context: 0.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.4 m
Intercept Depth
136 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136-136.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 0.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.4 m
Intercept Depth
136 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136-136.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is moderate over a narrow interval, contributing to the high-grade nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 0.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.4 m
Intercept Depth
136 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136-136.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 0.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.4 m
Intercept Depth
136 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136-136.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 0.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.4 m
Intercept Depth
136 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136-136.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“4.15”

Context: 0.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.4 m
Intercept Depth
136 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136-136.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“14.31”

Context: 0.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 13.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.4 m
Intercept Depth
136 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136-136.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“13.12”

Context: 0.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copper_equivalentGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper_equivalent
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m
From
136.62 m
To
136.79 m
Intercept Depth
136.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136.62-136.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong copper equivalent grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m
From
136.62 m
To
136.79 m
Intercept Depth
136.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136.62-136.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper grade is weak over a very narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m
From
136.62 m
To
136.79 m
Intercept Depth
136.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136.62-136.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This nickel grade is weak over a very narrow interval, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m
From
136.62 m
To
136.79 m
Intercept Depth
136.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136.62-136.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Trace cobalt grade, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m
From
136.62 m
To
136.79 m
Intercept Depth
136.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136.62-136.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Sulfur content is noted, indicating the presence of sulfides, which is consistent with the polymetallic mineralization.

Evidence · table

“6.61”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 13.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m
From
136.62 m
To
136.79 m
Intercept Depth
136.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136.62-136.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron content is noted, consistent with the presence of iron-bearing sulfides in the mineralization.

Evidence · table

“13.90”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · magnesium oxideGrade: 19.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
magnesium oxide
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.17 m
From
136.62 m
To
136.79 m
Intercept Depth
136.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:136.62-136.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide content is noted, consistent with the ultramafic host rock.

Evidence · table

“19.57”

Context: 0.17

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
137.78 m
To
140 m
Intercept Depth
137.78 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:137.78-140
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.22 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
137.78 m
To
140 m
Intercept Depth
137.78 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:137.78-140
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.27 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
137.78 m
To
140 m
Intercept Depth
137.78 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:137.78-140
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
137.78 m
To
140 m
Intercept Depth
137.78 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:137.78-140
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.02 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.02”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
137.78 m
To
140 m
Intercept Depth
137.78 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:137.78-140
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.42 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.42 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.42”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.85 m
From
145.4 m
To
153.25 m
Intercept Depth
145.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:145.4-153.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.85 m
From
145.4 m
To
153.25 m
Intercept Depth
145.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:145.4-153.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.85 m
From
145.4 m
To
153.25 m
Intercept Depth
145.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:145.4-153.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.85 m
From
145.4 m
To
153.25 m
Intercept Depth
145.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:145.4-153.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.82 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.82”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.85 m
From
145.4 m
To
153.25 m
Intercept Depth
145.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:145.4-153.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.78 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.78 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.78”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.00”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.7 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 18.7 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 % nickel is moderate against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18.7 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“18.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 31.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
31.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.2 % iron_ore is weak against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.20”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.16 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 3.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
3.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.17 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“3.17”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 12.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
12.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.7 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 12.7 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.81 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.81”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 18 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.00”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.87
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.87
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.87
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.87
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11.5 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“11.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 22.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
22.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.87
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 22.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10.1 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 21.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
21.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.1 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 21.1 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.89
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.89 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.89”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.6 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 19.6 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.60”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10.3 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.1 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 20.1 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
165 m
To
178 m
Intercept Depth
165 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:165-178
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
165 m
To
178 m
Intercept Depth
165 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:165-178
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
165 m
To
178 m
Intercept Depth
165 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:165-178
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
165 m
To
178 m
Intercept Depth
165 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:165-178
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.66 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
165 m
To
178 m
Intercept Depth
165 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:165-178
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.12 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.12 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.12”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
186 m
To
187 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:186-187
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
186 m
To
187 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:186-187
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
186 m
To
187 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:186-187
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
186 m
To
187 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:186-187
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.7 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
186 m
To
187 m
Intercept Depth
186 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:186-187
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.1 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.1 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
189 m
To
189.4 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:189-189.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.61
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
189 m
To
189.4 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:189-189.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.61
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
189 m
To
189.4 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:189-189.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.61
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
189 m
To
189.4 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:189-189.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.61
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.1 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
189 m
To
189.4 m
Intercept Depth
189 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:189-189.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.61
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 12 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.00”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
201 m
To
204 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:201-204
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
201 m
To
204 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:201-204
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.26 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
201 m
To
204 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:201-204
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
201 m
To
204 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:201-204
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.12 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.12”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
201 m
To
204 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:201-204
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.9 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.9 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.90”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
208.5 m
To
210 m
Intercept Depth
208.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:208.5-210
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
208.5 m
To
210 m
Intercept Depth
208.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:208.5-210
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
208.5 m
To
210 m
Intercept Depth
208.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:208.5-210
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
208.5 m
To
210 m
Intercept Depth
208.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:208.5-210
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.13 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.13”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
From
208.5 m
To
210 m
Intercept Depth
208.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-23:208.5-210
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.5 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.5 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36.84 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36.84 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36.84 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36.84 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.28 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36.84 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36.84 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36.84 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36.84 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.67 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.67”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-23Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36.84 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-23
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36.84 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 15.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
139.66 m
To
140.66 m
Intercept Depth
139.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:139.66-140.66
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: LB-24-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
139.66 m
To
140.66 m
Intercept Depth
139.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:139.66-140.66
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: LB-24-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
139.66 m
To
140.66 m
Intercept Depth
139.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:139.66-140.66
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: LB-24-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 9.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
9.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
139.66 m
To
140.66 m
Intercept Depth
139.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:139.66-140.66
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.32 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.32”

Context: LB-24-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
139.66 m
To
140.66 m
Intercept Depth
139.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:139.66-140.66
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.59 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 19.59 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.59”

Context: LB-24-24

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
144.9 m
To
145.18 m
Intercept Depth
144.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:144.9-145.18
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.07
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
144.9 m
To
145.18 m
Intercept Depth
144.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:144.9-145.18
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.07
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
144.9 m
To
145.18 m
Intercept Depth
144.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:144.9-145.18
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.07
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
144.9 m
To
145.18 m
Intercept Depth
144.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:144.9-145.18
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.07
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.03 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.03”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
144.9 m
To
145.18 m
Intercept Depth
144.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:144.9-145.18
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.07
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.2 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 18.2 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.20”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.07 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.07 m
From
151.25 m
To
151.32 m
Intercept Depth
151.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:151.25-151.32
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.07 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.07 m
From
151.25 m
To
151.32 m
Intercept Depth
151.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:151.25-151.32
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.07 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.07 m
From
151.25 m
To
151.32 m
Intercept Depth
151.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:151.25-151.32
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 4.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.07 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.07 m
From
151.25 m
To
151.32 m
Intercept Depth
151.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:151.25-151.32
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.42 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.42”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 13.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.07 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.07 m
From
151.25 m
To
151.32 m
Intercept Depth
151.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-24:151.25-151.32
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.5 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 13.5 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.8 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-24Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-24
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.99
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.99 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 18.99 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.99”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m
From
117.4 m
To
117.58 m
Intercept Depth
117.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:117.4-117.58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: LB-24-25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m
From
117.4 m
To
117.58 m
Intercept Depth
117.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:117.4-117.58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: LB-24-25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m
From
117.4 m
To
117.58 m
Intercept Depth
117.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:117.4-117.58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: LB-24-25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.79
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m
From
117.4 m
To
117.58 m
Intercept Depth
117.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:117.4-117.58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.79 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.79”

Context: LB-24-25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m
From
117.4 m
To
117.58 m
Intercept Depth
117.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:117.4-117.58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.8 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.8 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.80”

Context: LB-24-25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.33 m
From
120.46 m
To
125.79 m
Intercept Depth
120.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:120.46-125.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.33 m
From
120.46 m
To
125.79 m
Intercept Depth
120.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:120.46-125.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.33 m
From
120.46 m
To
125.79 m
Intercept Depth
120.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:120.46-125.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.33 m
From
120.46 m
To
125.79 m
Intercept Depth
120.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:120.46-125.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.47 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.47”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.33 m
From
120.46 m
To
125.79 m
Intercept Depth
120.46 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:120.46-125.79
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.49 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 15.49 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.49”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.29 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.29 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.29 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.29 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.45 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.45”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.29 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.7 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.7 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.1 % copper is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 9.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
9.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.36 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.36”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.5 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 20.5 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.17 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.5 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
11.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11.4 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“11.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.8 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 20.8 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.68 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.68 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.68 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.68 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.00”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.68 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.4 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 19.4 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.00”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 24.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
24.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24.4 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 24.4 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“24.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.11 m
From
141 m
To
141.11 m
Intercept Depth
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:141-141.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.11 m
From
141 m
To
141.11 m
Intercept Depth
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:141-141.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.11 m
From
141 m
To
141.11 m
Intercept Depth
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:141-141.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 9.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
9.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.11 m
From
141 m
To
141.11 m
Intercept Depth
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:141-141.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.26 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.26”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.11 m
From
141 m
To
141.11 m
Intercept Depth
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-25:141-141.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.11
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 19.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.5 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-25Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-25
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.54 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 15.54 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.54”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
126.95 m
To
127.7 m
Intercept Depth
126.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:126.95-127.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: LB-24-26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
126.95 m
To
127.7 m
Intercept Depth
126.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:126.95-127.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: LB-24-26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
126.95 m
To
127.7 m
Intercept Depth
126.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:126.95-127.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: LB-24-26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 3.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
3.92
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
126.95 m
To
127.7 m
Intercept Depth
126.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:126.95-127.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.92 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“3.92”

Context: LB-24-26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.75 m
From
126.95 m
To
127.7 m
Intercept Depth
126.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:126.95-127.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 13.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.30”

Context: LB-24-26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.4 m
To
129.9 m
Intercept Depth
129.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:129.4-129.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.4 m
To
129.9 m
Intercept Depth
129.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:129.4-129.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.17 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.4 m
To
129.9 m
Intercept Depth
129.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:129.4-129.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
3.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.4 m
To
129.9 m
Intercept Depth
129.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:129.4-129.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.48 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“3.48”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129.4 m
To
129.9 m
Intercept Depth
129.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:129.4-129.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 13.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
131 m
To
131.4 m
Intercept Depth
131 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:131-131.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
131 m
To
131.4 m
Intercept Depth
131 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:131-131.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
131 m
To
131.4 m
Intercept Depth
131 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:131-131.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 9.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
9.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
131 m
To
131.4 m
Intercept Depth
131 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:131-131.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.03 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.03”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m
From
131 m
To
131.4 m
Intercept Depth
131 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:131-131.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
148.22 m
To
148.5 m
Intercept Depth
148.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:148.22-148.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
148.22 m
To
148.5 m
Intercept Depth
148.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:148.22-148.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
148.22 m
To
148.5 m
Intercept Depth
148.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:148.22-148.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.87
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
148.22 m
To
148.5 m
Intercept Depth
148.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:148.22-148.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.87 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.87”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 16.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.28 m
From
148.22 m
To
148.5 m
Intercept Depth
148.22 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:148.22-148.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.6 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 16.6 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.60”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.35 m
From
150 m
To
150.35 m
Intercept Depth
150 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:150-150.35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.22 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.35 m
From
150 m
To
150.35 m
Intercept Depth
150 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:150-150.35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.35 m
From
150 m
To
150.35 m
Intercept Depth
150 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:150-150.35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.35 m
From
150 m
To
150.35 m
Intercept Depth
150 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:150-150.35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.08 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.08”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.35 m
From
150 m
To
150.35 m
Intercept Depth
150 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:150-150.35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.7 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.7 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.97 m
From
153.2 m
To
154.17 m
Intercept Depth
153.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:153.2-154.17
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.97 m
From
153.2 m
To
154.17 m
Intercept Depth
153.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:153.2-154.17
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.97 m
From
153.2 m
To
154.17 m
Intercept Depth
153.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:153.2-154.17
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.97 m
From
153.2 m
To
154.17 m
Intercept Depth
153.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:153.2-154.17
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.88 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.88”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 21.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.97 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
21.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.97 m
From
153.2 m
To
154.17 m
Intercept Depth
153.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:153.2-154.17
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 21.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.09 m
From
156.4 m
To
156.49 m
Intercept Depth
156.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:156.4-156.49
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.09 m
From
156.4 m
To
156.49 m
Intercept Depth
156.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:156.4-156.49
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.09 m
From
156.4 m
To
156.49 m
Intercept Depth
156.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:156.4-156.49
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.09 m
From
156.4 m
To
156.49 m
Intercept Depth
156.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:156.4-156.49
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.45 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.45”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 15.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.09 m
From
156.4 m
To
156.49 m
Intercept Depth
156.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:156.4-156.49
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.6 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 15.6 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“15.60”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
158.27 m
To
158.47 m
Intercept Depth
158.27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:158.27-158.47
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
158.27 m
To
158.47 m
Intercept Depth
158.27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:158.27-158.47
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.26 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
158.27 m
To
158.47 m
Intercept Depth
158.27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:158.27-158.47
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
158.27 m
To
158.47 m
Intercept Depth
158.27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:158.27-158.47
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.24 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.24”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
158.27 m
To
158.47 m
Intercept Depth
158.27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:158.27-158.47
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.6 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.6 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.60”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.05 m
From
161.7 m
To
169.75 m
Intercept Depth
161.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:161.7-169.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.05 m
From
161.7 m
To
169.75 m
Intercept Depth
161.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:161.7-169.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.05 m
From
161.7 m
To
169.75 m
Intercept Depth
161.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:161.7-169.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.05 m
From
161.7 m
To
169.75 m
Intercept Depth
161.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:161.7-169.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.15 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.15”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.05 m
From
161.7 m
To
169.75 m
Intercept Depth
161.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-26:161.7-169.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.37 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.37 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.37”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10.39 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.39”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 21.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
21.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.51 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 21.51 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.51”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.91
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.91 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.91”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 20.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
2.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.56 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.56”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 12.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.39 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
12.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.8 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 12.8 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 14.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 14.4 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“14.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 26.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
26.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.1 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 26.1 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 6.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
6.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.85 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.85”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-26Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.59 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-26
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.59 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.1 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.1 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-27Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-27
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.44 m
From
142.04 m
To
149.48 m
Intercept Depth
142.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-27:142.04-149.48
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: LB-24-27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-27Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-27
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.44 m
From
142.04 m
To
149.48 m
Intercept Depth
142.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-27:142.04-149.48
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.28 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: LB-24-27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-27Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-27
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.44 m
From
142.04 m
To
149.48 m
Intercept Depth
142.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-27:142.04-149.48
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: LB-24-27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-27Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-27
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.44 m
From
142.04 m
To
149.48 m
Intercept Depth
142.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-27:142.04-149.48
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.46 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.46”

Context: LB-24-27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-27Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-27
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.44 m
From
142.04 m
To
149.48 m
Intercept Depth
142.04 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-27:142.04-149.48
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.78
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.33 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.33 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.33”

Context: LB-24-27

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.46 m
From
127.4 m
To
127.86 m
Intercept Depth
127.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:127.4-127.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: LB-24-28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.46 m
From
127.4 m
To
127.86 m
Intercept Depth
127.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:127.4-127.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: LB-24-28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.46 m
From
127.4 m
To
127.86 m
Intercept Depth
127.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:127.4-127.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: LB-24-28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.69
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.46 m
From
127.4 m
To
127.86 m
Intercept Depth
127.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:127.4-127.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.69 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.69”

Context: LB-24-28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.46 m
From
127.4 m
To
127.86 m
Intercept Depth
127.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:127.4-127.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 19 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.00”

Context: LB-24-28

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.9 m
From
133.75 m
To
140.65 m
Intercept Depth
133.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:133.75-140.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.9 m
From
133.75 m
To
140.65 m
Intercept Depth
133.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:133.75-140.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.9 m
From
133.75 m
To
140.65 m
Intercept Depth
133.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:133.75-140.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.9 m
From
133.75 m
To
140.65 m
Intercept Depth
133.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:133.75-140.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.67 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.67”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 19.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
19.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.9 m
From
133.75 m
To
140.65 m
Intercept Depth
133.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:133.75-140.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.19 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 19.19 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.19”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.66 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.66 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % nickel is moderate against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.66 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.66 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 17.6 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“17.60”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 30.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.66 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
30.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.66 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30.8 % iron_ore is weak against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“30.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.56
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.56
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.56
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
9.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.56
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.7 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.56
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.7 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 20.7 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 13.2 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“13.20”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 25.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
25.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.49 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.1 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 25.1 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
11.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11.5 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“11.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 21.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
21.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.45 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.7 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 21.7 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“21.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10.8 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.8 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 20.8 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.88
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.88
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.88
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 14.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.88
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 14.4 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“14.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 26.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
26.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.88
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.4 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 26.4 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 4.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
4.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.19 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.19 % copper is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.19”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 16.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
16.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16.9 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“16.90”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 27.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
27.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.54
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.8 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 27.8 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 13.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 13.7 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“13.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 25.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
25.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25.6 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 25.6 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“25.60”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11.3 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“11.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
22.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.8 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 22.8 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.83 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.83 m
From
144.36 m
To
146.19 m
Intercept Depth
144.36 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:144.36-146.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.83 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.83 m
From
144.36 m
To
146.19 m
Intercept Depth
144.36 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:144.36-146.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.26 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.83 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.83 m
From
144.36 m
To
146.19 m
Intercept Depth
144.36 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:144.36-146.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.83 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.83 m
From
144.36 m
To
146.19 m
Intercept Depth
144.36 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:144.36-146.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.16 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.16”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 14.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.83 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
14.71
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.83 m
From
144.36 m
To
146.19 m
Intercept Depth
144.36 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-28:144.36-146.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.71 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 14.71 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.71”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.92
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.92 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.92”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-28Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-28
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.19 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.29 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 18.29 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.29”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.42 m
From
407 m
To
408.42 m
Intercept Depth
407 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:407-408.42
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.22 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: LB-24-29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.42 m
From
407 m
To
408.42 m
Intercept Depth
407 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:407-408.42
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: LB-24-29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.42 m
From
407 m
To
408.42 m
Intercept Depth
407 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:407-408.42
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: LB-24-29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 5.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
5.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.42 m
From
407 m
To
408.42 m
Intercept Depth
407 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:407-408.42
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.63 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.63”

Context: LB-24-29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
13.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.42 m
From
407 m
To
408.42 m
Intercept Depth
407 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:407-408.42
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.3 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 13.3 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.30”

Context: LB-24-29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79 m
From
732.83 m
To
733.62 m
Intercept Depth
732.83 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:732.83-733.62
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79 m
From
732.83 m
To
733.62 m
Intercept Depth
732.83 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:732.83-733.62
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % nickel is weak against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79 m
From
732.83 m
To
733.62 m
Intercept Depth
732.83 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:732.83-733.62
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % cobalt is weak against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
15.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79 m
From
732.83 m
To
733.62 m
Intercept Depth
732.83 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:732.83-733.62
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 15.8 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“15.80”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 27.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.79 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
27.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.79 m
From
732.83 m
To
733.62 m
Intercept Depth
732.83 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:732.83-733.62
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.41 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 27.41 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“27.41”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m
From
906.74 m
To
906.98 m
Intercept Depth
906.74 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:906.74-906.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m
From
906.74 m
To
906.98 m
Intercept Depth
906.74 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:906.74-906.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.16 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m
From
906.74 m
To
906.98 m
Intercept Depth
906.74 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:906.74-906.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 7.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
7.69
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m
From
906.74 m
To
906.98 m
Intercept Depth
906.74 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:906.74-906.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.69 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.69”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.24 m
From
906.74 m
To
906.98 m
Intercept Depth
906.74 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:906.74-906.98
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.7 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 18.7 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
936.75 m
To
936.95 m
Intercept Depth
936.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:936.75-936.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
936.75 m
To
936.95 m
Intercept Depth
936.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:936.75-936.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
936.75 m
To
936.95 m
Intercept Depth
936.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:936.75-936.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 8.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
8.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
936.75 m
To
936.95 m
Intercept Depth
936.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:936.75-936.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.49 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.49”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 17.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
17.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.2 m
From
936.75 m
To
936.95 m
Intercept Depth
936.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:936.75-936.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.2 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 17.2 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.20”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.21 m
From
941.9 m
To
942.11 m
Intercept Depth
941.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:941.9-942.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.21 m
From
941.9 m
To
942.11 m
Intercept Depth
941.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:941.9-942.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.21 m
From
941.9 m
To
942.11 m
Intercept Depth
941.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:941.9-942.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 11.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
11.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.21 m
From
941.9 m
To
942.11 m
Intercept Depth
941.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:941.9-942.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11.7 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“11.70”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 23.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.21 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
23.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.21 m
From
941.9 m
To
942.11 m
Intercept Depth
941.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:941.9-942.11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23.5 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 23.5 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“23.50”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.26 m
From
943.6 m
To
943.86 m
Intercept Depth
943.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:943.6-943.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · nickelGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.26 m
From
943.6 m
To
943.86 m
Intercept Depth
943.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:943.6-943.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % nickel is below against the default band [3, 1.5, 0.8, 0.3] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 % nickel is below the weak threshold (0.3 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.26 m
From
943.6 m
To
943.86 m
Intercept Depth
943.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:943.6-943.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % cobalt is below against the default band [0.5, 0.3, 0.15, 0.08] %.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % cobalt is below the weak threshold (0.08 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · sulfurGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
sulfur
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.26 m
From
943.6 m
To
943.86 m
Intercept Depth
943.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:943.6-943.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10.1 % sulfur. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for sulfur; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.10”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LB-24-29Lac Brulé · iron_oreGrade: 20.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LB-24-29
Project
Lac Brulé
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
SRQ

Geometry

Grade
20.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.26 m
From
943.6 m
To
943.86 m
Intercept Depth
943.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LB-24-29:943.6-943.86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
North Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-06-24T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.9 % iron_ore is below against the default band [62, 58, 50, 30] % Fe.

Negative factors

  • 20.9 % iron_ore is below the weak threshold (30 % Fe) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“20.90”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.