Starcore Reports First Quarter Production Results

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Starcore International Mines Ltd.
Ticker
SAM
Exchange
TSX
Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Metallurgy, Production
Extracted
2026-09-12 23:17:25 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Starcore reported Q1 2026 production results for the San Martin Mine, noting a decline in gold and silver grades and recoveries compared to the previous quarter. The company attributed lower recoveries to preg-robbing effects from carbonaceous clays in the oxide ore and is implementing a new CIL plant to optimize processing.

Reasoning: Production results show declining grades and recoveries compared to Q4 2025, specifically attributed to preg-robbing carbonaceous shales in the oxide ore.

Positive factors

  • ramping up production of carbon ore with better grades

Negative factors

  • lower gold and silver recoveries due to preg-robbing clays
  • gold grade and silver grade declined quarter-over-quarter
  • gold recovery declined quarter-over-quarter

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

Refractory Orenegative · Story-specific tag

Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.

Why it applies: The release notes that carbonaceous shales have a preg-robbing effect, absorbing gold and silver during processing.

Evidence · text

“clays - composed of carbonaceous shales - have a preg-robbing effect, absorbing gold and silver”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a sign-off by a Qualified Person (Salvador García) as required under NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Salvador Garcia, B. Eng., a director of the Company and Chief Operating Officer, is the Company's qualified person on the project as required under NI 43-101”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("CIL")

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (4)

CILSan Martin · goldRecovery: 75 %Head Grade: 1.91Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
CIL
Processing Route
CIL (carbon-in-leach)
Sample
5,370 tons of stockpiled ore

Recovery

Recovery
75 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.91
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Stockpile processing results provided as part of quarterly production update.

Evidence · text

“166 equivalent gold ounces were produced in the quarter from a milling of 5,370 tons of stockpiled ore grading 1.91 g/t of gold”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 75% is below the weak band (80%)

CILSan Martin · silverRecovery: 65 %Head Grade: 17.5Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
CIL
Processing Route
CIL (carbon-in-leach)
Sample
5,370 tons of stockpiled ore

Recovery

Recovery
65 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
17.5
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Stockpile processing results provided as part of quarterly production update.

Evidence · text

“17.5 g/t of silver and with recoveries of 75% for gold and 65% for silver”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 65% is below the weak band (75%)

Fact 3San Martin · goldRecovery: 77.42 %Head Grade: 1.47Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Sample
San Martin Production Q1 2026

Recovery

Recovery
77.42 %
Head Grade
1.47
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Quarterly production grade and recovery reported via table.

Negative factors

  • grade decline vs Q4 2025

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: 54,247

Tags used in scoring

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 77.42% is below the weak band (80%)

Fact 4San Martin · silverRecovery: 54.78 %Head Grade: 12.88Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Sample
San Martin Production Q1 2026

Recovery

Recovery
54.78 %
Head Grade
12.88
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Quarterly production grade and recovery reported via table.

Negative factors

  • grade decline vs Q4 2025

Evidence · table

“12.88”

Context: 54,247

Tags used in scoring

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 54.78% is below the weak band (75%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.