STARCORE Reports First Quarter Production Results

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Starcore International Mines Ltd.
Ticker
SAM
Exchange
TSX
Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Production, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-12 22:28:38 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Starcore International Mines reported Q1 2027 production results for the San Martin Mine in Mexico, highlighting a progressive increase in production from its new carbonaceous ore circuit. While ore tonnage and gold grade saw slight year-over-year declines, gold and silver recoveries both improved significantly compared to the same period last year.

Reasoning: The company reports steady production with improving metallurgical recoveries and the establishment of a new carbonaceous ore circuit, alongside new exploration targets.

Positive factors

  • progressive increase in ounces produced from carbonaceous ore process
  • improved gold recovery (85.49% vs 77.42% Y/Y)
  • improved silver recovery (58.12% vs 54.78% Y/Y)
  • new exploration phase initiated based on geophysical anomalies

Negative factors

  • slight decrease in ore milled tonnage Y/Y
  • slight decrease in gold grade Y/Y

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release names Salvador Garcia, B. Eng. as the Qualified Person (QP) for the technical information.

Evidence · text

“Salvador Garcia, B. Eng., a director of the Company and Chief Operating Officer, is the Company's qualified person on the project”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("CIL")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (2)

Fact 1San Martin · goldRecovery: 74.11 %Head Grade: 2.62Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Sample
carbonaceous ore process

Recovery

Recovery
74.11 %
Head Grade
2.62
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Specific recovery and grade reported for the new carbonaceous ore circuit.

Positive factors

  • newly established integrated process for carbonaceous ore

Negative factors

  • recovery (74.11%) is lower than the overall mine average (85.49%)

Evidence · text

“grades of 2.62 g/t gold and 20.65 g/t silver, and recovery rates of 74.11% for gold”

Tags used in scoring

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 74.11% is below the weak band (80%)

Fact 2San Martin · silverRecovery: 68.58 %Head Grade: 20.65Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Sample
carbonaceous ore process

Recovery

Recovery
68.58 %
Head Grade
20.65
Head Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Specific recovery and grade reported for the new carbonaceous ore circuit.

Positive factors

  • newly established integrated process for carbonaceous ore

Evidence · text

“20.65 g/t silver, and recovery rates of 74.11% for gold and 68.58% for silver”

Tags used in scoring

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 68.58% is below the weak band (75%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.