# STARR PEAK EXPANDS LAND POSITION NEAR NEWM&\#xC9;TAL PROJECT WITH ACQUISITION OF COPPER CLIVE PROPERTY Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/starr-peak-expands-land-position-near-newm-xc9-tal-project-with-acquisition-of-c--6edc4333-3b6b-44a1-9a77-151a8ec43f44 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/STE/news/6197264649409910/starr-peak-expands-land-position-near-newm-xc9-tal-project-with-acquisition-of-c Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2025-05-15T12:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Starr Peak Mining Ltd. - Ticker: STE - Exchange: TSX - Region: Québec - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: Gold, Zinc, Silver - Document categories: Resource update, Agreement transaction - Extracted: 2026-09-19 01:53:20 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Starr Peak Mining Ltd. has acquired 100% of the Copper Clive Project in Québec for $40,000. The property consists of 29 claims \(3,643.23 hectares\) and is located near the company's Normétal Mine and known copper mineralization. Reasoning: The company has expanded its land position through a low-cost acquisition of a property with nearby known mineralization and new geophysical targets. - Positive factor: Acquisition of 100% interest in Copper Clive Project - Positive factor: Proximity to past-producing Normétal Mine - Positive factor: Presence of new geophysical anomalies \(TDEM\) - Positive factor: Adjacent known copper mineralization - Negative factor: Acquisition price is relatively low \($40,000\) - Negative factor: Historical data on the property has not been verified by the QP Facts used in scoring: 5 ## Classification and evidence **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Story-specific tag Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The acquisition is highlighted by its proximity \(10km\) to the past-producing Normétal Mine and Perron gold mineralization. Evidence · text > around 10 kilometers north of the Company's 100% owned past-producing Normétal Mine **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: The release names an independent Qualified Person \(Alexis Paulin Bissonnette\) who reviewed the geological information. Evidence · text > Qualified Person Alexis Paulin Bissonnette, Ing. \(OIQ 5037621\), an independent Qualified Person as defined by Canadian NI 43-101 standards, has reviewed and approved the geological information ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (4) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/starr-peak-expands-land-position-near-newm-xc9-tal-project-with-acquisition-of-c--6edc4333-3b6b-44a1-9a77-151a8ec43f44#fact-resource-facts-1) Normétal Mine · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Normétal Mine - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Québec - Ticker: STE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:8ae1a6560523dcbff874 #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 2.15 - Grade Unit: % #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2025-05-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Normétal Mine resource is cited as historical context and has not been verified by the current QP. - Negative factor: Historical data not verified - Negative factor: Methodology unknown Evidence · text > Normétal Mine \(10.1Mt @ 2.15% Cu, 5.12% Zn, 0.55 g/t Au, 45.25 /t Ag\) #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/starr-peak-expands-land-position-near-newm-xc9-tal-project-with-acquisition-of-c--6edc4333-3b6b-44a1-9a77-151a8ec43f44#fact-resource-facts-2) Normétal Mine · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Normétal Mine - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Québec - Ticker: STE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:8ae1a6560523dcbff874 #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 5.12 - Grade Unit: % #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2025-05-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Zn grade from Normétal Mine. - Negative factor: Historical data not verified Evidence · text > 5.12% Zn #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/starr-peak-expands-land-position-near-newm-xc9-tal-project-with-acquisition-of-c--6edc4333-3b6b-44a1-9a77-151a8ec43f44#fact-resource-facts-3) Normétal Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Normétal Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Québec - Ticker: STE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:8ae1a6560523dcbff874 #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 0.55 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2025-05-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Au grade from Normétal Mine. - Negative factor: Historical data not verified Evidence · text > 0.55 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/starr-peak-expands-land-position-near-newm-xc9-tal-project-with-acquisition-of-c--6edc4333-3b6b-44a1-9a77-151a8ec43f44#fact-resource-facts-4) Normétal Mine · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Normétal Mine - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Québec - Ticker: STE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:8ae1a6560523dcbff874 #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 10100000 - Grade: 45.25 - Grade Unit: /t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2025-05-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Ag grade from Normétal Mine. - Negative factor: Historical data not verified Evidence · text > 45.25 /t Ag #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.