Stellar Africagold Updates Ongoing Exploration and Drilling Activities at the Tichka Est Gold Project, Morocco

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Stellar AfricaGold Inc.
Ticker
SPX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Morocco
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results, Agreement transaction
Extracted
2026-09-19 00:42:56 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Stellar AfricaGold provided an update on its Tichka Est Gold Project in Morocco, reporting progress on a 1,500m drill program. Key results from hole TCK1 include a 13m intercept at 6.12 g/t Au, including 2m at 22.28 g/t Au, confirming mineralization extension beyond known trenches.

Reasoning: The update provides progress on an ongoing drilling campaign, confirming high-grade gold intercepts in TCK1, though most current results are still pending assay.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercepts confirmed in TCK1
  • Mineralization extends beyond known trenching
  • QA/QC mentioned with ISO-certified lab

Negative factors

  • Drilling progress delayed by weather and mechanical issues
  • Assays for most current holes are still pending

Facts used in scoring: 5

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 22.28 g/t Au is exceptionally high for an orogenic gold deposit.

Evidence · text

“2 meters of 22.28 g/t Au”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release mentions use of an ISO-certified laboratory in Marrakech.

Evidence · text

“Afrilab, an ISO-certified laboratory in Marrakech”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Mineralization confirmed to continue more than 100m beyond the nearest high-grade trench.

Evidence · text

“confirmed that mineralization continues more than 100 metres beyond the nearest high-grade trench”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (4)

TCK1Tichka Est · goldGrade: 6.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TCK1
Project
Tichka Est
Commodity
gold
Region
morocco
Reported Region
morocco
Ticker
SPX

Geometry

Grade
6.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold intercept confirming mineralization continuity.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and width

Evidence · text

“13 meters of 6.12 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TCK1Tichka Est · goldGrade: 22.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TCK1
Project
Tichka Est
Commodity
gold
Region
morocco
Reported Region
morocco
Ticker
SPX

Geometry

Grade
22.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high grade intercept within the larger interval.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade

Evidence · text

“2 meters of 22.28 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TCK1Tichka Est · goldGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TCK1
Project
Tichka Est
Commodity
gold
Region
morocco
Reported Region
morocco
Ticker
SPX

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lower grade component of the TCK1 interval.

Positive factors

  • Significant width

Evidence · text

“16 meters of 1.98 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TCK1Tichka Est · goldGrade: 11.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TCK1
Project
Tichka Est
Commodity
gold
Region
morocco
Reported Region
morocco
Ticker
SPX

Geometry

Grade
11.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade component within the 16m interval.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Evidence · text

“1 meter of 11.55 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.