STLLR Gold Intersects 16.52 g/t Au over 5.85 Metres at the Jonpol Deposit of the Tower Gold Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- STLLR Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- STLR
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-18 23:36:05 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
STLLR Gold reported high-grade gold drill results from the Jonpol Deposit at the Tower Gold Project, highlighted by an uncut intercept of 16.52 g/t Au over 5.85m. The 2026 program aims to extend the open-pit strike length and de-risk the mineral resource estimate.
Reasoning: Strong high-grade gold intercepts at the Jonpol deposit, supporting both strike extension and resource confidence objectives.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts (16.52 g/t Au)
- True width disclosed for all intercepts
- QA/QC protocols clearly stated including ISO 17025 lab
- Program objectives include strike extension and resource de-risking
- Results exceed current average open-pit grades
Facts used in scoring: 14
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 16.52 g/t Au over 5.85m is exceptionally high grade for an orogenic gold deposit.
Evidence · text
“STLLR Gold Intersects 16.52 g/t Au over 5.85 Metres”
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: All reported intercepts include a stated true thickness (TT).
Evidence · text
“3.30 m true thickness (" TT ")”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release details ALS accreditation, use of CRMs, blanks, and check assays.
Evidence · text
“ALS is an ISO 17025 accredited laboratory. STLLR inserts independent certified reference material and blanks”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drilling targets the western strike extension of the Jonpol mineralization.
Evidence · text
“majority of the 2026 meterage targets the western extension of Jonpol's open-pit mineralization”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Program includes objectives to confirm the block model and support resource expansion.
Evidence · text
“The drill program is also designed to confirm the block model and support the potential expansion”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 14. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (14)
MGA26-248Tower · goldGrade: 16.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-248
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- True Width
- 3.3 m
- From
- 160.15 m
- To
- 166 m
- Hole Depth
- 166 m
- Intercept Depth
- 160.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-248:160.15-166
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Easting
- 577397.395
- Northing
- 5374223.057
- Elevation
- 293.587 m
- Azimuth
- 158.1 °
- Dip
- -51.53 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade intercept for an orogenic gold deposit.
Positive factors
- High grade intercept
- True width disclosed
Evidence · table
“16.52”
Context: 5.85
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.3
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
MGA26-251Tower · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-251
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.65 m
- True Width
- 14.31 m
- From
- 49.7 m
- To
- 72.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 175 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-251:49.7-72.35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Easting
- 577376.85
- Northing
- 5374156.067
- Elevation
- 294.11 m
- Azimuth
- 160.02 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Wide intercept with good continuity and a high-grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Significant width
- Includes high-grade sub-interval
Evidence · table
“1.46”
Context: 22.65
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 14.31
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
MGA26-251Tower · goldGrade: 5.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-251
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- True Width
- 1.98 m
- From
- 49.7 m
- To
- 52.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 175 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-251:49.7-52.85
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Easting
- 577376.85
- Northing
- 5374156.067
- Elevation
- 294.11 m
- Azimuth
- 160.02 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade component within a larger intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Evidence · table
“5.27”
Context: 3.15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.98
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
MGA26-248 (cut)Tower · goldGrade: 9.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-248 (cut)
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- From
- 160.15 m
- To
- 166 m
- Intercept Depth
- 160.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-248 (cut):160.15-166
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.22 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 53.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.22 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.22”
Context: MGA26-248 (cut)
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MGA26-248 (uncut)Tower · goldGrade: 16.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-248 (uncut)
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- From
- 160.15 m
- To
- 166 m
- Intercept Depth
- 160.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-248 (uncut):160.15-166
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.52 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 96.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 16.52 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“16.52”
Context: MGA26-248 (uncut)
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MGA26-249Tower · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-249
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 133 m
- To
- 135 m
- Intercept Depth
- 133 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-249:133-135
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: MGA26-249
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MGA26-249Tower · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-249
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 193 m
- Intercept Depth
- 175 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-249:175-193
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MGA26-249Tower · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-249
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.15 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 224.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 220.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-249:220.5-224.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MGA26-250Tower · goldGrade: 2.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-250
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 97 m
- To
- 98 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-250:97-98
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.44 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.44 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.44”
Context: MGA26-250
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
MGA26-250Tower · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MGA26-250
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 147 m
- To
- 148 m
- Intercept Depth
- 147 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MGA26-250:147-148
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.Tower · goldGrade: 5.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.15 m
- From
- 49.7 m
- To
- 52.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:49.7-52.85
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.27 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 16.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.27 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.27”
Context: incl.
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.Tower · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.8 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 113 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:95.2-113
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.13 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 20.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.13”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.Tower · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 138 m
- To
- 141.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 138 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:138-141.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
incl.Tower · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Tower
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- STLR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 169.75 m
- To
- 172 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:169.75-172
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Jonpol
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, check_assays
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: and
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.