Strategic Lithium Project Acquisition with Near-Term Production

Original announcement by research on

Company
Savannah Resources plc
Ticker
SAV
Exchange
LSE
Region
northern Portugal
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
Copper, Gold, Tin, Tungsten
Document categories
Agreement transaction, Other, Drill results, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-11-10 14:30:18 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Savannah Resources says it has entered into an agreement to acquire a 75% interest in a portfolio of lithium projects in northern Portugal, centred on Mina do Barroso. The release emphasises approved permitting, near-term production potential and milestone-based consideration tied to a future JORC resource. It also includes historical exploration and rock-chip/drill results, plus preliminary metallurgical indications of a high-grade spodumene concentrate.

Reasoning: The release is primarily about Savannah entering into an agreement to acquire a strategic lithium project portfolio in Portugal, with production potential and milestone-based consideration. The technical content is supportive background rather than the main current event.

Positive factors

  • acquisition of a 75% interest in the Portuguese lithium projects
  • approved Mining Plan, EIA and 30-year mining concession/Mining Licence
  • near-term production potential and development pathway described
  • JORC resource target and milestone-linked transaction terms

Negative factors

  • no completed JORC resource is reported in this document
  • some exploration areas are subject to overlapping tenure
  • metallurgical work is preliminary and assays/results are historical

Facts used in scoring: 72

Classification and evidence

Nearology Playneutral · Story-specific tag

The disclosed value premise relies on proximity to another known deposit rather than the issuer's own results. Mere location or along-strike wording in a release that reports its own drilling does not establish this premise.

Why it applies: The acquisition pitch emphasises the Mina do Barroso prospect and nearby Portuguese lithium projects as a strategic opportunity.

Evidence · text

“Strategic opportunity to become the first significant lithium producer in Europe”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: The JORC table describes sampling, duplicates and laboratory procedures, including standards and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“1 in 25 samples were duplicated in the field”

Compositing Transparentpositive · Story-specific tag

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The release states the cut-off and internal dilution used for reported lithium intercepts.

Evidence · text

“Significant intercepts were calculated using a 0.7%Li2O cut off, no more than 1m of internal dilution”

True Width Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The JORC table states the drill holes are vertical and the mineralisation is sub vertical, allowing geometry context for the reported lengths.

Evidence · text

“The drill holes are vertical and the mineralisation is sub vertical.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative · Story-specific tag

A reported assay interval gives downhole or apparent length without a disclosed true width. It describes geometric uncertainty, not a measured true thickness or proof that the interval is overstated; drill orientation alone is not a true-width measurement.

Why it applies: Most historical drill intercepts are reported as downhole lengths without stated true widths.

Evidence · text

“down hole lengths are reported”

Single Domain Onlynegative · Story-specific tag

The source establishes that the completed programme is limited to one composite or ore domain and representativeness across the relevant material is not established. One extracted sample alone does not prove that the source tested no others.

Why it applies: The metallurgical comment reports only one preliminary concentrate outcome rather than variability across multiple ore domains.

Evidence · text

“Initial preliminary metallurgical test work has been completed”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("concentrate")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 65. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (64)

CB2Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CB2
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
0 m
To
10 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CB2:0-10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Historical drilling includes 10 m at 1.1% Li2O from surface in hole CB2.

Positive factors

  • drill intercept starts at surface
  • above 1% Li2O over 10 m

Negative factors

  • historical result from past explorers
  • true width not stated

Evidence · text

“10m at 1.1% Li2O from surface in CB2 (EOH)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

RES01CMina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES01C
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19 m
From
21 m
To
40 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RES01C:21-40
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole RES01C returned 19 m at 1.03% Li2O from 21 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 19 m intercept above 1% Li2O
  • supports lithium anomaly in historical drilling

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“19m at 1.03% Li2O from 21m in RES01C”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

CB2Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CB2
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
0 m
To
7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CB2:0-7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole CB2 also returned 7 m at 1.22% Li2O from surface.

Positive factors

  • shallow drill intercept
  • grade above 1% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drill result
  • true width not stated

Evidence · text

“7m at 1.22% Li2O from surface in CB2 (EOH)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

RES06Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES06
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.5 m
From
2 m
To
10.5 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RES06:2-10.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole RES06 is listed at 8.5 m at 1% Li2O from 2 m depth.

Positive factors

  • near-surface intercept
  • meets 1% Li2O threshold

Negative factors

  • historical result
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“8.5 at 1% Li2O from 2m RES06 (EOH)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

GRA05Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GRA05
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m
From
0 m
To
16 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GRA05:0-16
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Grandao
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole GRA05 returned 16 m at 1.35% Li2O from surface.

Positive factors

  • 16 m intercept at 1.35% Li2O
  • supports lithium mineralisation in Grandao area

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • true width not stated

Evidence · text

“16m at 1.35% Li2O from surface in GRA05”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

RES07Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES07
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
0 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RES07:0-14
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole RES07 is reported at 14 m at 1.04% Li2O from surface.

Positive factors

  • 14 m intercept above 1% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“14m at 1.04% Li2O from surface in RES07”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

GRA15Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GRA15
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
7 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GRA15:7-24
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Grandao
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole GRA15 returned 17 m at 1% Li2O from 7 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 17 m intercept at 1% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • true width not stated

Evidence · text

“17m at 1% Li2O from 7m GRA15”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

RES019Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES019
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32 m
From
20 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
20 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RES019:20-52
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole RES019 is reported at 32 m at 1.16% Li2O from 20 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 32 m intercept at 1.16% Li2O
  • near-surface style lithium mineralisation

Negative factors

  • historical drill result
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“32m at 1.16% Li2O from 20m in RES019”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

GRA028Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GRA028
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
32 m
To
40 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GRA028:32-40
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Grandao
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole GRA028 returned 8 m at 1.43% Li2O from 32 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 8 m intercept above 1.4% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • short intercept

Evidence · text

“8m at 1.43% Li2O from 32m in GRA028”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

RES023Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES023
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
43 m
To
54 m
Intercept Depth
43 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RES023:43-54
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole RES023 is listed at 11 m at 1.1% Li2O from 43 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 11 m intercept above 1% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • deeper than surface samples

Evidence · text

“11m at 1.1% Li2O from 43m in RES023”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

NOA01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22 m
From
3 m
To
25 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NOA01:3-25
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
NOA area
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole NOA01 is reported at 22 m at 1.1% Li2O from 3 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 22 m intercept from near surface
  • grade above 1% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • true width not stated

Evidence · text

“22m at 1.1% Li2O from 3m in NOA01 (EOH)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

RES030Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES030
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
1 m
To
13 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RES030:1-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole RES030 returned 12 m at 1.6% Li2O from 1 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 12 m intercept at 1.6% Li2O
  • starts near surface

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“12m at 1.6% Li2O from 1m in RES030”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

NOA13Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA13
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
7 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NOA13:7-22
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
NOA area
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole NOA13 is reported at 15 m at 1% Li2O from 7 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 15 m intercept at 1% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • true width not stated

Evidence · text

“15m at 1% Li2O from 7m in NOA13”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

SAC01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAC01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
16 m
To
28 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAC01:16-28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
SAC area
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole SAC01 is reported at 12 m at 1.22% Li2O from 16 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 12 m intercept above 1% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“12m at 1.22% Li2O from 16m in SAC01 (EOH)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

RES01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
2 m
To
12 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RES01:2-12
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole RES01 returned 10 m at 1.5% Li2O from 2 m depth.

Positive factors

  • 10 m intercept at 1.5% Li2O
  • near-surface mineralisation

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“10m at 1.5% Li2O from 2m in RES01 (EOH)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

SP2Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SP2
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
0 m
To
13 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SP2:0-13
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mina do Barroso
Loc. Confidence
inferred
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
1 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Hole SP2 is listed at 13 m at 1.24% Li2O from surface.

Positive factors

  • 13 m intercept from surface
  • grade above 1.2% Li2O

Negative factors

  • historical drilling
  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“13m at 1.24% Li2O from surface in SP2(EOH)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

NOA 1AMina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 5030Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1A
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
5030
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599135
Northing
4609422
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5030 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“5030”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1A · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1AMina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1A
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599135
Northing
4609422
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 % lithium is moderate against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1A · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1310Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1310
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599148
Northing
4609433
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1310 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1310”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599148
Northing
4609433
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % lithium is below against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • 0.28 % lithium is below the weak threshold (0.6 % Li2O) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 3280Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 510 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
3280
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
510 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599146
Northing
4609248
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3280 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“3280”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 510 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
510 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599146
Northing
4609248
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % lithium is weak against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-03Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 9660Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1015 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-03
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
9660
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1015 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599145
Northing
4609243
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9660 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“9660”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-03 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-03Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 2.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1015 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-03
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
2.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1015 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599145
Northing
4609243
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.06 % lithium is exceptional against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 2.06 % lithium is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.06”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-03 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 7830Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1520 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
7830
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599146
Northing
4609418
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7830 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7830”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1520 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599146
Northing
4609418
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.67 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.67”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-05Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 6910Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2025 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-05
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
6910
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2025 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599146
Northing
4609414
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6910 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“6910”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-05 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-05Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2025 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-05
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2025 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599146
Northing
4609414
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.48 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.48 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.48”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-05 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-06Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 4120Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2530 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-06
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
4120
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2530 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599150
Northing
4609408
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4120 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4120”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-06 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 1-06Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2530 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 1-06
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2530 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599150
Northing
4609408
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 % lithium is weak against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 1-06 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 4550Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
4550
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599173
Northing
4609401
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4550 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4550”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599173
Northing
4609401
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 % lithium is moderate against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 8860Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 510 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
8860
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
510 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599173
Northing
4609405
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8860 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“8860”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 510 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.89
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
510 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599173
Northing
4609405
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.89 % lithium is exceptional against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.89 % lithium is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.89”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-03Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 6620Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1015 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-03
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
6620
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1015 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599174
Northing
4609410
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6620 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“6620”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-03 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-03Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1015 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-03
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1015 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599174
Northing
4609410
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.41 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.41 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.41”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-03 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 4190Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1520 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
4190
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599175
Northing
4609414
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4190 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4190”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1520 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
0.89
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599175
Northing
4609414
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.89 % lithium is weak against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.89”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-05Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 9310Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2025 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-05
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
9310
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2025 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599175
Northing
4609420
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9310 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“9310”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-05 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-05Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2025 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-05
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.99
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2025 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599175
Northing
4609420
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.99 % lithium is exceptional against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.99 % lithium is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.99”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-05 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-06Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 4330Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2530 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-06
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
4330
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2530 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599176
Northing
4609425
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4330 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4330”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-06 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 2-06Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2530 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 2-06
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2530 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599176
Northing
4609425
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.92 % lithium is moderate against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 2-06 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 5520Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
5520
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599200
Northing
4609427
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5520 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“5520”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599200
Northing
4609427
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.18 % lithium is moderate against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 6100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 510 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
6100
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
510 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599207
Northing
4609420
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6100 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“6100”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 510 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
510 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599207
Northing
4609420
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.3 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.30”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 4930Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1520 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
4930
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599201
Northing
4609418
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4930 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4930”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1520 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599201
Northing
4609418
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 % lithium is moderate against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-05Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 9420Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2025 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-05
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
9420
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2025 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599200
Northing
4609413
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9420 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“9420”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-05 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-05Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 2.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2025 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-05
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
2.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2025 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599200
Northing
4609413
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.01 % lithium is exceptional against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 2.01 % lithium is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.01”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-05 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-06Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 14400Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2530 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-06
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
14400
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2530 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599199
Northing
4609409
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 14400 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“14400”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-06 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-06Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2530 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-06
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
3.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2530 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599199
Northing
4609409
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.07 % lithium is exceptional against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 3.07 % lithium is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.07”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-06 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-07Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 6560Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3035 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-07
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
6560
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3035 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599193
Northing
4609406
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6560 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“6560”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-07 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 3-07Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3035 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 3-07
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3035 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599193
Northing
4609406
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.4 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 3-07 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 4Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 8710Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 4
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
8710
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599229
Northing
4609414
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8710 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“NOA 4 599229 4609414 0 to 5 5m circle - radius 8710 0.871 1.86 1.85 14 17 26 37 32 99 22”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 4 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NOA 4Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NOA 4
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599229
Northing
4609414
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.86 % lithium is exceptional against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.86 % lithium is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“NOA 4 599229 4609414 0 to 5 5m circle - radius 8710 0.871 1.86 1.85 14 17 26 37 32 99 22”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · NOA 4 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 8100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
8100
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
20 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
600016
Northing
4609146
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8100 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“8100”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-01Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-01
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
600016
Northing
4609146
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.73 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.73 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.73”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-01 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 6750Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2040 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
6750
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2040 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
600000
Northing
4609163
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6750 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“6750”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-02Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2040 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-02
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2040 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
600000
Northing
4609163
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.44 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.44 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-02 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-03Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 8310Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4060 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-03
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
8310
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4060 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599983
Northing
4609175
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8310 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“8310”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-03 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-03Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4060 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-03
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4060 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599983
Northing
4609175
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.77 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.77 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.77”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-03 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 7780Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6080 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
7780
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6080 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599946
Northing
4609185
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7780 ppm lithium, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (% Li2O).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the lithium rubric unit % Li2O; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7780”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RES 1-04Mina do Barroso · lithiumGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6080 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RES 1-04
Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern portugal

Geometry

Grade
1.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6080 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
599946
Northing
4609185
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.66 % lithium is strong against the default band [1.8, 1.3, 0.9, 0.6] % Li2O.

Positive factors

  • 1.66 % lithium is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: Appendix 2A. Rock Chip Sampling completed by Savannah during April 2017 · RES 1-04 · Columns: SAMPLE ID | Easting | Northing | Length (m) | Field Notes | Li ppm | Li2O % | Li % | Ta ppm | Ta2O5 % | Nb ppm | Nb2O5 % | Sn ppm | Be ppm | Cs ppm

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Reported assays have a certified laboratory, actual QA/QC methods, or named QP/CP responsibility. Generic CP boilerplate, old-release references, plans and unrelated work are insufficient. Approval of a correction does not verify expressly unverified historical assays; assay accuracy is not guaranteed.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

Reported composited assay intervals omit the cut-off grade used for those intervals. Apply only to actual reported assay intervals in the reviewed scope, not drilling plans or missing extraction fields alone.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metallurgical Results (1)

metallurgical test workMina do Barroso · lithiumView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mina do Barroso
Commodity
lithium
Region
northern portugal
Reported Region
northern Portugal
Ticker
SAV

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
metallurgical test work
Processing Route
spodumene concentration
Sample
mineralised rock from Mina do Barroso

Recovery

Conc. Grade
6
Conc. Grade Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The release states that preliminary metallurgical test work indicated a clean spodumene concentrate over 6% Li2O can be produced.

Positive factors

  • preliminary metallurgical test work produced a high-grade concentrate
  • clean, low iron concentrate described

Negative factors

  • recovery not quantified
  • testwork is preliminary and historical

Evidence · text

“a high-grade (over 6% Li2O), clean, low iron, lithium concentrate can be produced”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.