TDG Continues Expanding Aurora West and Identifies New Porphyry Target

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
TDG Gold Corp.
Ticker
TDG
Exchange
TSX
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-13 02:50:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

TDG Gold Corp. announced drill results from its 2025 exploration program at the Aurora West Zone, part of the Greater Shasta–Newberry Project in British Columbia. Step-out drill hole TDG25-020 significantly expanded mineralization, intersecting 1.02 g/t gold and 0.43% copper over 14.0 meters within a broader 86.3-meter interval. The company also identified a new porphyry-style target 600 meters north of the Aurora Complex, further supporting the district-scale potential of the project.

Reasoning: TDG Gold Corp. reported strong drill results that significantly extended mineralization at the Aurora West Zone and identified a new porphyry target, indicating substantial growth potential for the project within a district-scale system.

Positive factors

  • Significant step-out drilling extended mineralization at Aurora West by 350m down-dip.
  • High-grade gold and copper intercepts were reported, consistent with porphyry mineralization.
  • A new porphyry-style target was identified 600m north of the Aurora Complex, expanding exploration potential.
  • The Aurora West Zone strike length has been expanded to approximately 1,000m.
  • QA/QC protocols were disclosed, including certified labs and QP sign-off.

Negative factors

  • True width of drill intercepts is unknown.
  • Some drill holes returned low-grade or trace mineralization.
  • Diluted gold and copper grades were noted in TDG25-020 due to interpreted late mafic dykes.
  • Assay results are preliminary, with the full set for the 2025 program not yet received.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 48

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 48. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (46)

TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-020
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
806 m
To
820 m
Hole Depth
869 m
Intercept Depth
736.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-020:806-820
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
Easting
622100
Northing
6348685
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Elevation
1251 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval within the significant step-out hole TDG25-020, indicating strong mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for a porphyry system.
  • Significant intercept within a key step-out hole.

Negative factors

  • True width is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 14.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-020
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
806 m
To
820 m
Hole Depth
869 m
Intercept Depth
736.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-020:806-820
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
Easting
622100
Northing
6348685
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Elevation
1251 m
Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper sub-interval within the significant step-out hole TDG25-020, indicating strong mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade for a porphyry system.
  • Significant intercept within a key step-out hole.

Negative factors

  • True width is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 14.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TDG25-012Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 115 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-012
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
115 m
From
554 m
To
669 m
Intercept Depth
554 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-012:554-669
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 126.5 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: TDG25-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-012Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 115 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-012
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
115 m
From
554 m
To
669 m
Intercept Depth
554 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-012:554-669
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 43.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: TDG25-012

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
556 m
To
571 m
Intercept Depth
556 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:556-571
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.57 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
556 m
To
571 m
Intercept Depth
556 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:556-571
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88 m
From
581 m
To
669 m
Intercept Depth
581 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:581-669
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 114.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.30”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
88 m
From
581 m
To
669 m
Intercept Depth
581 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:581-669
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 37.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-015Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 183.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-015
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
183.1 m
From
501.9 m
To
685 m
Intercept Depth
501.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-015:501.9-685
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 84.2 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: TDG25-015

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-015Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 183.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-015
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
183.1 m
From
501.9 m
To
685 m
Intercept Depth
501.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-015:501.9-685
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 34.8 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: TDG25-015

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
520 m
To
530 m
Intercept Depth
520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:520-530
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.79 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.79 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
520 m
To
530 m
Intercept Depth
520 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:520-530
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
555 m
To
566 m
Intercept Depth
555 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:555-566
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.53 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
555 m
To
566 m
Intercept Depth
555 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:555-566
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
633 m
To
648 m
Intercept Depth
633 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:633-648
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.03 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 15.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.03 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.03”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
633 m
To
648 m
Intercept Depth
633 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:633-648
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-017Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-017
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
484 m
To
497 m
Intercept Depth
484 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-017:484-497
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.5 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: TDG25-017

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-017Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-017
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
484 m
To
497 m
Intercept Depth
484 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-017:484-497
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: TDG25-017

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
1.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.3 m
From
614 m
To
646.3 m
Intercept Depth
614 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:614-646.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.38 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 44.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.38 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.38”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32.3 m
From
614 m
To
646.3 m
Intercept Depth
614 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:614-646.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 13.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.41 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.5 m
From
653.5 m
To
672 m
Intercept Depth
653.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:653.5-672
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.61 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.5 m
From
653.5 m
To
672 m
Intercept Depth
653.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:653.5-672
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-019Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-019
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
60.2 m
From
631.9 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
631.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-019:631.9-692
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 35.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.59 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: TDG25-019

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-019Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-019
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
60.2 m
From
631.9 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
631.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-019:631.9-692
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: TDG25-019

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.1 m
From
635 m
To
659.1 m
Intercept Depth
635 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:635-659.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 22.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.94 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24.1 m
From
635 m
To
659.1 m
Intercept Depth
635 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:635-659.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-014Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-014
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
174 m
To
177.8 m
Intercept Depth
174 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-014:174-177.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: TDG25-014

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-014Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-014
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.8 m
From
174 m
To
177.8 m
Intercept Depth
174 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-014:174-177.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: TDG25-014

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.5 m
From
305 m
To
313.5 m
Intercept Depth
305 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:305-313.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.5 m
From
305 m
To
313.5 m
Intercept Depth
305 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:305-313.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
454.2 m
To
454.9 m
Intercept Depth
454.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:454.2-454.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
2.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
454.2 m
To
454.9 m
Intercept Depth
454.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:454.2-454.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.24 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.24 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.24”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-018Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-018
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
351 m
To
362 m
Intercept Depth
351 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-018:351-362
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: TDG25-018

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-018Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-018
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
351 m
To
362 m
Intercept Depth
351 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-018:351-362
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: TDG25-018

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
372 m
To
378 m
Intercept Depth
372 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:372-378
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
372 m
To
378 m
Intercept Depth
372 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:372-378
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.2 m
From
742.9 m
To
756.1 m
Intercept Depth
742.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:742.9-756.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.2 m
From
742.9 m
To
756.1 m
Intercept Depth
742.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:742.9-756.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.4 m
From
775.6 m
To
785 m
Intercept Depth
775.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:775.6-785
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.4 m
From
775.6 m
To
785 m
Intercept Depth
775.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:775.6-785
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-020
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.3 m
From
736.5 m
To
822.8 m
Intercept Depth
736.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-020:736.5-822.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 42.3 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: TDG25-020

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 86.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TDG25-020
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
86.3 m
From
736.5 m
To
822.8 m
Intercept Depth
736.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TDG25-020:736.5-822.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
West Zone
CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: TDG25-020

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24 m
From
770 m
To
794 m
Intercept Depth
770 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:770-794
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.57 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m
From
770 m
To
794 m
Intercept Depth
770 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:770-794
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
806 m
To
820 m
Intercept Depth
806 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:806-820
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.02 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.02 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl.
Project
Aurora West Zone
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
TDG

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
806 m
To
820 m
Intercept Depth
806 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl.:806-820
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM Z9N NAD83

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: and incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (2)

inferredShasta · goldTonnes: 276000Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8.6Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Shasta
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
TDG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-12-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Sue Bird
Resource group id
resource:df73f9a0c3ab5be0db18
Deposit or zone
TSF1

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
276000
Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
8.6
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-12-29

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A restated Inferred gold resource for TSF1, representing a smaller, potentially satellite deposit.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade in the Inferred category.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Relatively small tonnage.
  • This is a restatement of a prior estimate, so novelty is low.

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 0.276

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredShasta · silverTonnes: 276000Grade: 45Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 398Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Shasta
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
TDG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-12-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Sue Bird
Resource group id
resource:df73f9a0c3ab5be0db18
Deposit or zone
TSF1

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
276000
Grade
45
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
398
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-12-29

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.37
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A restated Inferred silver resource for TSF1, representing a smaller, potentially satellite deposit.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade in the Inferred category.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • Relatively small tonnage.
  • This is a restatement of a prior estimate, so novelty is low.

Evidence · table

“45.0”

Context: 0.276

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.